Can a tax authority attach funds related to a foreign company’s income in India, even when those funds are secured by Letters of Credit (LCs)? The Supreme Court of India tackled this complex issue in a case involving Formula One World Championship Limited (FOWC), an international company, and several banks. This case clarifies the extent […]
Can a public authority arbitrarily renew a lease of public land, especially when the original purpose of the lease is not being fulfilled? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case involving the Ujjain Development Authority (UDA) and Ajar Enterprises Private Limited. The court ultimately set aside the lease renewal, emphasizing
Can a High Court dismiss a second appeal without stating reasons? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case concerning a property partition dispute. The Court emphasized the importance of reasoned judgments, particularly in appellate cases. This case highlights the necessity for High Courts to provide clear explanations when dismissing appeals.
Can a contractor claim additional payments for work when there’s a discrepancy in government-prescribed rates? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a civil appeal concerning a construction contract. The court upheld the High Court’s decision, which had rejected certain claims made by a contractor for extra work. This case clarifies how
Can a contractor claim additional payments for work beyond the original contract? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving a construction contract dispute. The court examined whether a contractor was entitled to extra payments for stone pitching and water lead, ultimately ruling against the contractor. This judgment highlights the
LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of mandatory sports broadcasting signal sharing under the Sports Act, 2007 and its interplay with cable television regulations. CASE TYPE: Broadcasting Rights/Sports Law Case Name: Union of India vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors. Judgment Date: 22 August 2017 Introduction Can cable operators re-transmit sports broadcasts shared with
LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct court for trying offenses under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act). CASE TYPE: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Securities and Exchange Board of India vs. Classic Credit Ltd. Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21 August 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 729 Judges: Jagdish Singh Khehar, CJI,
LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “personal effects” under the Baggage Rules, 1998, specifically concerning the import of jewellery by tourists. CASE TYPE: Customs Law Case Name: Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Ors. vs. Pushpa Lekhumal Tolani Date of the Judgment: 18 August 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 716 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J. and Prafulla C. Pant, J.
Can a criminal case for cheating be quashed when the parties have settled a dispute arising from a cheque bounce? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case where the parties had reached an amicable settlement. This case involved a dispute initially related to a cheque dishonor, which then led to
LEGAL ISSUE: Proportionality of sentencing in criminal cases involving sudden altercations. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Madhavan & Ors vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: 14 August 2017 Date of the Judgment: 14 August 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 701 Judges: Dipak Misra, J., A.M. Khanwilkar, J. Can a sentence be reduced if
LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior decision regarding cadre restructuring can be superseded by a later comprehensive review. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ravichandran & Ors. Date of the Judgment: 11 August 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 707 Judges: Madan B. Lokur, J., Prafulla C. Pant, J., Deepak Gupta,
Can the court fee for an income tax appeal be determined by the date of assessment or the date the appeal is filed? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent judgment. This case clarifies which court fee rules apply to appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
