Judges

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on School Teacher Termination: Shubham Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha vs. Dnyaneshwar Daigavhane (2017)

Can a High Court set aside a School Tribunal’s order based on internal disputes within a school’s management? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving the termination of a school teacher. This case highlights the importance of adhering to legal procedures and deciding cases based on merit, not internal […]

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on School Teacher Termination: Shubham Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha vs. Dnyaneshwar Daigavhane (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Release of Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Nagorao vs. MIDC (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether enhanced compensation awarded in land acquisition cases should be released to the landowners. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Nagorao S/O Vitthalrao Salunke vs. Regional Officer, MIDC, Latur & Ors. Judgment Date: July 17, 2017 Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, addressed the issue of releasing enhanced compensation

Supreme Court Orders Release of Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Nagorao vs. MIDC (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court ensures uniform compensation in land acquisition cases: Munshiya vs. State of U.P. (2017)

Can land owners receive different compensation for land acquired under the same notification? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this issue in a case concerning land acquisition compensation. The court emphasized the need for uniformity in compensation for land acquired under the same notification. This judgment ensures that landowners receive equal treatment. Citation: (2017)

Supreme Court ensures uniform compensation in land acquisition cases: Munshiya vs. State of U.P. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code in a case of destruction of evidence: Padmini Mahendrabhai Gadda vs. State of Gujarat (2017)

Date of the Judgment: July 17, 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 678 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J. and Prafulla C. Pant, J. (Divided Opinion) Can mere silence and subsequent absconding be sufficient to convict a person for destruction of evidence under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code in a case of destruction of evidence: Padmini Mahendrabhai Gadda vs. State of Gujarat (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into Manipur Extrajudicial Killings: Extra Judl. Exec. Victim Families Assn. vs. Union of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Investigation into alleged extrajudicial killings by security forces. CASE TYPE: Criminal Writ Petition Case Name: Extra Judl. Exec. Victim Families Assn. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: July 14, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: July 14, 2017 Citation: Not Available in Source Judges: Madan B. Lokur, J., Uday

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into Manipur Extrajudicial Killings: Extra Judl. Exec. Victim Families Assn. vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies insurer’s liability in motor accident claims despite vehicle transfer: Firdaus vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party in a motor accident claim when the vehicle was insured by the original owner, but the vehicle was later transferred to another person without intimation to the insurer. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Claim Case Name: Firdaus vs. Oriental Insurance

Supreme Court clarifies insurer’s liability in motor accident claims despite vehicle transfer: Firdaus vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of demand evidence: Mukhtiar Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether proof of demand for illegal gratification is essential for conviction under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Prevention of Corruption Act Case Name: Mukhtiar Singh (Since Deceased) Through His L.R. vs. State of Punjab Judgment Date: 14 July 2017 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of demand evidence: Mukhtiar Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Domestic Violence Case: Manmohan Attavar vs. Neelam Manmohan Attavar (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a woman can claim the right to reside in a shared household under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, if she has never lived in that household with the respondent. CASE TYPE: Domestic Violence Case Name: Manmohan Attavar vs. Neelam Manmohan Attavar Judgment Date: July 14, 2017 Introduction Can

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Domestic Violence Case: Manmohan Attavar vs. Neelam Manmohan Attavar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Interprets SEBI Takeover Regulations: Laurel Energetics vs. SEBI (2017)

Can inter se transfers of shares between promoters be exempt from open offer obligations under SEBI regulations if the target company is a result of a demerger? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent judgment. The core issue revolved around whether the three-year promoter status should be calculated from the date

Supreme Court Interprets SEBI Takeover Regulations: Laurel Energetics vs. SEBI (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies compensation for disability in motor accident cases: New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Gajender Yadav (2017)

Date of the Judgment: July 13, 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 9006 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 25827 of 2015) Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R. Banumathi, J. Can a person who has suffered a disability in a motor accident claim compensation for both physical disability and loss of future earnings? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies compensation for disability in motor accident cases: New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Gajender Yadav (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Past Service Benefits for DGS&D Employee: Union of India vs. O.T. Anthrayose (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether past service benefits, including seniority, should be granted to an employee from the date of joining the Directorate General of Supplies & Disposals (DGS&D). CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India vs. O.T. Anthrayose Judgment Date: 13 July 2017 Date of the Judgment: 13 July 2017 The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Upholds Past Service Benefits for DGS&D Employee: Union of India vs. O.T. Anthrayose (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Selection of Horticulture Officers in Jammu & Kashmir: Vinod Kumar Khajuria vs. State (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of selection process for government jobs. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Vinod Kumar Khajuria & Anr. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 13 July 2017 Date of the Judgment: 13 July 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and R. Banumathi, J. Can a selection process

Supreme Court Upholds Selection of Horticulture Officers in Jammu & Kashmir: Vinod Kumar Khajuria vs. State (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top