Judges

Supreme Court directs equitable payment in construction dispute: Rajkamal Builders vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 17, 2008 Judges: R.V. Raveendran, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a contractor be left unpaid for an extended period due to disputes between statutory bodies? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a case involving Rajkamal Builders and the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), concerning the construction of a bridge […]

Supreme Court directs equitable payment in construction dispute: Rajkamal Builders vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Decision on School Appointment Based on Merit: Commr. & Director of School Edu. vs. V.D. Dhanalakshmi (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 17, 2008 Citation: [Citation not available in the provided text] Judges: Justice Tarun Chatterjee, Justice Dr. Mukunda Kam Sharma In a case concerning the appointment of a teacher, the Supreme Court addressed whether the authorities should approve the appointment of the first respondent based on the recommendations made by the

Supreme Court Orders Decision on School Appointment Based on Merit: Commr. & Director of School Edu. vs. V.D. Dhanalakshmi (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court orders fresh consideration of oppression and mismanagement case: Vinod Kumar vs. M/S. Singmalon Equipment Pvt. Ltd. (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 17, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute between a shareholder and the other shareholders of a company, concerning allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The central question revolves around whether the Company Law Board (CLB) and the High Court of Judicature at Madras properly evaluated the circumstances

Supreme Court orders fresh consideration of oppression and mismanagement case: Vinod Kumar vs. M/S. Singmalon Equipment Pvt. Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Due to Violation of Natural Justice: Mariamma Roy vs. Indian Bank (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Judges: Justice Tarun Chatterjee, Justice Aftab Alam When is it acceptable for a higher court to intervene, even when other legal avenues are available? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Mariamma Roy vs. Indian Bank, focusing on the principles of natural justice. The

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Due to Violation of Natural Justice: Mariamma Roy vs. Indian Bank (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Writ Appeal After Condoning Delay: State of Kerala vs. Wilson K.C. (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. In a case concerning procedural delays, the Supreme Court of India addressed the question of whether sufficient cause existed to condone a delay of 116 days in filing a writ appeal. The case, State of Kerala

Supreme Court Restores Writ Appeal After Condoning Delay: State of Kerala vs. Wilson K.C. (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the bonafide requirement of landlord in eviction petition: Ajit Singh vs. Jit Ram (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Citation: [2008] INSC 1471 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can a landlord evict a tenant if the property is required for the use of the landlord’s son? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the interpretation of the East Punjab

Supreme Court settles the bonafide requirement of landlord in eviction petition: Ajit Singh vs. Jit Ram (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Insurer’s Liability in Accident Claims: United India Insurance vs. Subbulakshmi (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed the extent of an insurance company’s liability in motor accident claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. This case, United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. A. N. Subbulakshmi & Ors., arose from a 1981 accident involving a car and a lorry.

Supreme Court Limits Insurer’s Liability in Accident Claims: United India Insurance vs. Subbulakshmi (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority: K.M. Mishra vs. Central Bank of India (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. In cases of promotions, can an employee be denied promotion based on performance appraisals? The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute over promotion to the post of Chief Manager, Rajbhasha in Senior Manager Grade, Scale IV in the Central

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority: K.M. Mishra vs. Central Bank of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of inherent powers of High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in quashing FIR: Lakhwant Singh vs. Jasbir Singh (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2003 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., G.S. Singhvi, J. Can a High Court quash a First Information Report (FIR) based on its inherent powers? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Lakhwant Singh v. Jasbir Singh, focusing on

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of inherent powers of High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in quashing FIR: Lakhwant Singh vs. Jasbir Singh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Capital Receipt vs. Revenue Receipt for Incentive Subsidy under Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Citation: Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras v. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 5694 of 2008 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 7926/04) Judges: S.H. Kapadia, J., B. Sudershan Reddy, J. Are incentive subsidies received by businesses capital receipts or revenue receipts for income tax purposes?

Supreme Court clarifies Capital Receipt vs. Revenue Receipt for Incentive Subsidy under Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act in import-related sales: Commissioner of Sales Tax vs. M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Judges: S.H. Kapadia, J. and B. Sudershan Reddy, J. When does a sale occasion the import of goods, thus falling under the purview of Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956? This question was at the heart of a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act in import-related sales: Commissioner of Sales Tax vs. M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Appointment of Principal in Aided Schools: Supreme Court clarifies the role of seniority and recognition in Gwalior Mahila Mandal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of appointing a principal in an aided school, specifically focusing on the roles of seniority and recognition of teachers. The case arose from a dispute over the appointment of a principal at Mahila Mandal Higher Secondary School in Danaoli. The

Appointment of Principal in Aided Schools: Supreme Court clarifies the role of seniority and recognition in Gwalior Mahila Mandal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top