Judges

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Dispute to Chandigarh: Kusum vs. Pritpal Singh (28th July, 2008)

Okay, I’m ready to continue generating the WordPress blog post based on the provided Supreme Court judgment. # Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Dispute to Chandigarh: Kusum vs. Pritpal Singh (28th July, 2008) “`html “` “`html Date of the Judgment: 28th July, 2008 Citation: [Citation not available in the provided text] Judges: K.G. Balakrishnan, […]

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Dispute to Chandigarh: Kusum vs. Pritpal Singh (28th July, 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court recalls order in divorce case due to non-compliance of alimony: Chintala Syamala vs. Chintala Venkata Satyanarayana Rao (28 July 2008)

Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2008 Judges: Justice B.N. Agrawal, Justice G.S. Singhvi Can a court reverse its decision if one party fails to uphold their promises? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case where a husband failed to pay the agreed-upon alimony to his wife. This led the Court

Supreme Court recalls order in divorce case due to non-compliance of alimony: Chintala Syamala vs. Chintala Venkata Satyanarayana Rao (28 July 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Regularization of MBBS Admission Under NRI Quota: Kunal Pankaj Kumar Shah vs. Justice R.J. Shah (Retd.) (28 July 2008)

Can a student, provisionally admitted to an MBBS course under the NRI quota, have their admission regularized if a seat becomes available? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Kunal Pankaj Kumar Shah vs. Justice R.J. Shah (Retd.) Admission Committee and Ors., where an MBBS student sought regularization of his

Supreme Court Directs Regularization of MBBS Admission Under NRI Quota: Kunal Pankaj Kumar Shah vs. Justice R.J. Shah (Retd.) (28 July 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows Vruddhashram appeals, directs inclusion in non-grant-aid list: Raja Shri Shivrai Pratishthan vs. State of Maharashtra (28 July 2008)

Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2008 Judges: B.N. Agrawal, G.S. Singhvi Can a government arbitrarily exclude established old age homes from a list of institutions selected for running Vruddhashrams (old age homes) on a non-grant-aid basis, especially when these homes have been operating satisfactorily? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a

Supreme Court allows Vruddhashram appeals, directs inclusion in non-grant-aid list: Raja Shri Shivrai Pratishthan vs. State of Maharashtra (28 July 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in 1986 Assault Case Due to Delayed FIR: State of Punjab vs. Mohinder Singh (26 June 2008)

Was a four-day delay in filing a First Information Report (FIR) fatal to the prosecution’s case? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in an appeal concerning an assault that occurred in 1986. The Court upheld the acquittal of the accused, emphasizing the lack of satisfactory explanation for the delay in registering the FIR.

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in 1986 Assault Case Due to Delayed FIR: State of Punjab vs. Mohinder Singh (26 June 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants mutual consent divorce decree despite husband’s initial absence: Sapna Rani vs. Pankaj Singla (2008)

Date of the Judgment: July 25, 2008 The Supreme Court addressed a case where a mutual consent divorce petition was initially dismissed due to the husband’s absence at the second motion stage. The core issue revolved around whether the court could grant a divorce decree despite this initial procedural hurdle, especially when both parties later

Supreme Court grants mutual consent divorce decree despite husband’s initial absence: Sapna Rani vs. Pankaj Singla (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles classification of “hair dye” under Central Excise Tariff Act: Godrej Industries Ltd. vs. D.G. Ahire (2008)

Date of the Judgment: 9th July 2008 Judges: Altamas Kabir, J., V.S. Sirpurkar, J. Can a product be classified as a “hair lotion” under the Central Excise Tariff Act, or should it be considered a separate product? The Supreme Court addressed this classification issue in the case of Godrej Industries Ltd. vs. D.G. Ahire, focusing

Supreme Court settles classification of “hair dye” under Central Excise Tariff Act: Godrej Industries Ltd. vs. D.G. Ahire (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Order of Land Reforms Appellate Authority in Karnataka Land Reforms Act Case: Arun Kumar vs. State of Karnataka (2008)

Date of the Judgment: April 7, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J. In a dispute concerning land rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, the Supreme Court of India addressed the legality of the High Court of Karnataka’s order that had overturned the decision of the Land Reforms Appellate Authority, Dharwad.

Supreme Court Restores Order of Land Reforms Appellate Authority in Karnataka Land Reforms Act Case: Arun Kumar vs. State of Karnataka (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Service Benefits between Army Personnel and GREF Officers: Ramesh Singh vs. Union of India (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 11, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J., Aftab Alam, J. Should employees of the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) receive the same service benefits as members of the Armed Forces? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in Ramesh Singh v. Union of India, a case

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Service Benefits between Army Personnel and GREF Officers: Ramesh Singh vs. Union of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rules for amending written statements in property disputes: Gautam Sarup vs. Leela Jetly (2008)

Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., V.S. Sirpurkar, J. Can a party be allowed to amend their written statement to retract admissions made earlier? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a property dispute arising from a will. The court examined the circumstances under which

Supreme Court clarifies rules for amending written statements in property disputes: Gautam Sarup vs. Leela Jetly (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court holds Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. liable for sales tax dues as an agent of its lessee: Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. vs. State of Kerala (2008)

Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 1804-1807 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 18346 – 18349 of 2004) Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Can a lessor be held responsible for the sales tax dues of its lessee if the lessee defaults? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court holds Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. liable for sales tax dues as an agent of its lessee: Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. vs. State of Kerala (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Teacher with Unrecognized Degree: Pramod Kumar vs. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 2568 of 2006 Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Can a teacher’s appointment be considered valid if they obtained their B.Ed. degree from a university not recognized by the University Grants Commission (UGC)? This was the central question before the Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Teacher with Unrecognized Degree: Pramod Kumar vs. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top