Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Culpable Homicide Case: Shriram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

/ Arijit Pasayat, Doraiswamy Raju, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Offences Affecting the Human Body, Right to Private Defence, Right to Private Defence with Section 100, Right to Private Defence with Section 97, Right to Private Defence with Section 99

When does a fight become a crime? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Shriram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, focusing on the line between self-defense and unlawful aggression. This case involves an incident where a group returning from a religious gathering was attacked, leading to serious injuries and a […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Culpable Homicide Case: Shriram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘industry’ under Industrial Disputes Act: Bangalore Water Supply vs. A. Rajappa (1978) INSC 298 (21 February 1978)

/ A.D. Koshal, D.A. Desai, Definition of Industry, Employee Rights, Industrial Disputes, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(j), Jaswant Singh, Judges, Labor Law, O. Chinnappa Reddy, P.N. Shinghal, R.S. Pathak, V.R. Krishna Iyer

Date of the Judgment: 21 February 1978 Citation: 1978 INSC 298 Judges: Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, Justice D.A. Desai, Justice R.S. Pathak, Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy, Justice A.D. Koshal, Justice P.N. Shinghal, Justice Jaswant Singh What constitutes an ‘industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? This question has been a subject of extensive legal debate.

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘industry’ under Industrial Disputes Act: Bangalore Water Supply vs. A. Rajappa (1978) INSC 298 (21 February 1978) Read Post »

Scroll to Top