Judges

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction: Punjab & Sind Bank Wins Against Frontline Corporation Ltd. (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, B.R. Gavai, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XLIII Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XXXIX Rule 1, Judges, SARFAESI Act, 2002, SARFAESI Act, 2002 with Section 13, SARFAESI Act, 2002 with Section 34, Secured Creditor Rights

Punjab & Sind Bank vs. Frontline Corporation Ltd.: Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court can interfere with actions taken under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). CASE TYPE: Securitisation Law. Case Name: Punjab & […]

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction: Punjab & Sind Bank Wins Against Frontline Corporation Ltd. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Double Overtime for Supervisors in Security Printing & Minting Corporation case: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe & Ors. (2023) INSC 379 (18 April 2023)

/ Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 3(q), Factories Act, 1948, Factories Act, 1948 with Section 2(l), Factories Act, 1948 with Section 59(1), Factories Act, 1948 with Section 64(1), Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Service Matters, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court clarifies Double Overtime for Supervisors in Security Printing & Minting Corporation case Date of the Judgment: 18 April 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 379 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. Can supervisors in government-owned printing and minting corporations claim double overtime pay? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this complex issue, examining

Supreme Court clarifies Double Overtime for Supervisors in Security Printing & Minting Corporation case: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe & Ors. (2023) INSC 379 (18 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe (2023) INSC 388

/ Factories Act, 1948, Factories Act, 1948 with Section 2(l), Factories Act, 1948 with Section 59(1), Factories Act, 1948 with Section 64(1), Government Employees, Judges, Overtime Allowance, Pankaj Mithal, Service Law, Service Rules, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units Date of the Judgment: April 18, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 388 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed whether supervisors in government-owned printing and minting facilities are entitled to double overtime pay under the Factories Act, 1948. This

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe (2023) INSC 388 Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Divorce Case: Delma Lubna Coelho vs. Edmond Clint Fernandes (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Divorce Proceedings, Family Law, Family Law with Article 142, Judges, Rajesh Bindal, Transfer of Matrimonial Cases

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Divorce Case: Delma Lubna Coelho vs. Edmond Clint Fernandes (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial proceedings from one state to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Delma Lubna Coelho vs. Edmond Clint Fernandes Judgment Date: 18 April 2023 Date of the Judgment: 18 April 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges:

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Divorce Case: Delma Lubna Coelho vs. Edmond Clint Fernandes (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence and procedural lapse: Fedrick Cutinha vs. State of Karnataka (2023)

/ Appellate Review, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 235, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 326, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence and procedural lapse: Fedrick Cutinha vs. State of Karnataka (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 18, 2023 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. Can a High Court overturn a trial court’s acquittal based on limited evidence, especially

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence and procedural lapse: Fedrick Cutinha vs. State of Karnataka (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Contract Killing Case: Ansar Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Contract Killing Case: Ansar Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Cancellation of bail due to improper consideration of relevant factors by the High Court. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ansar Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. Judgment Date: 18 April 2023 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Contract Killing Case: Ansar Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Santosh Karnani (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 41A, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 17A, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Santosh Karnani (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a public servant accused of corruption, especially when there is evidence of demand and acceptance of a bribe and attempts to evade arrest. CASE TYPE: Criminal (Prevention of Corruption Act) Case Name: Central

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Santosh Karnani (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Santosh Karnani (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 41A, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 17A, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Santosh Karnani (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case of alleged corruption involving a public servant. CASE TYPE: Criminal (Prevention of Corruption Act) Case Name: Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Santosh Karnani & Anr. [Judgment Date]: April 17, 2023 Introduction

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Santosh Karnani (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies vendor protection under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act in M/s Sri Mahavir Agency vs. State of West Bengal (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 with Section 14, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 with Section 19, Rajesh Bindal

Supreme Court on Vendor Liability under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act: M/s Sri Mahavir Agency vs. State of West Bengal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a vendor who sells packaged food items with a manufacturer’s warranty can be held liable under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 if the food is found to be

Supreme Court clarifies vendor protection under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act in M/s Sri Mahavir Agency vs. State of West Bengal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order for Additional Evidence in Asharam Case: State of Rajasthan vs. Asharam @ Ashumal (2023) INSC 338 (17 April 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 161, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 311, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 391, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order for Additional Evidence in Asharam Case Date of the Judgment: 17 April 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 338 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a High Court order additional evidence based on a book’s claims when the trial court has already considered the facts? The Supreme Court addressed

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order for Additional Evidence in Asharam Case: State of Rajasthan vs. Asharam @ Ashumal (2023) INSC 338 (17 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the effect of partition on pre-emption rights: Jhabbar Singh vs. Jagtar Singh (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Judges, Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 with Section 118, Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 with Section 121, Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 with Section 15, Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 with Section 4

Supreme Court clarifies the effect of partition on pre-emption rights: Jhabbar Singh vs. Jagtar Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a co-sharer’s right to pre-emption is extinguished if the joint status of the land is severed through partition proceedings before the final decree in the pre-emption suit. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Pre-emption Rights Case Name:

Supreme Court clarifies the effect of partition on pre-emption rights: Jhabbar Singh vs. Jagtar Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (17 April 2023)

/ Afforestation, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Environmental Law, Environmental Law with Specific Directions, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Public Interest Litigation, Public Interest Litigation with Aarey Forest, Public Interest Litigation with Mumbai Metro, Tree Felling

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) could fell more trees than initially permitted by the Supreme Court for the Mumbai Metro Line-3 project. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (17 April 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top