Judges

Supreme Court settles recovery of erroneous refunds under Central Excise Act: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. (24 March 2023)

/ Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11A, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11B, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 35E, Judges, Krishna Murari, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies recovery of erroneous refunds under Central Excise Act Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 254 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can the tax authorities recover an erroneous refund of excise duty without issuing a separate notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, […]

Supreme Court settles recovery of erroneous refunds under Central Excise Act: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the necessity of Section 11A notice for recovery of erroneous excise duty refunds when reviewed under Section 35E: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. (24 March 2023)

/ Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11A, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11B, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 35E, Judges, Krishna Murari, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Recovery of Erroneous Excise Duty Refunds: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a separate notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is required for the recovery of an erroneously refunded excise duty when the refund order is reviewed under

Supreme Court clarifies the necessity of Section 11A notice for recovery of erroneous excise duty refunds when reviewed under Section 35E: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Lack Locus Standi (24 March 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Lack Locus Standi (24 March 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether subsequent purchasers of land have the right to challenge land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Vijay Gupta & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 March 2023 Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023

Supreme Court Upholds Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Lack Locus Standi (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles locus standi of subsequent purchasers in land acquisition cases: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Vijay Gupta & Ors. (2023) INSC 297 (24 March 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Rules on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 297 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who buys land after the government has already started the process of acquiring it challenge that acquisition? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court settles locus standi of subsequent purchasers in land acquisition cases: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Vijay Gupta & Ors. (2023) INSC 297 (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Surrender of Prisoners Released on Emergency Parole/Interim Bail During COVID-19 Pandemic

/ Bail, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 437, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Criminal Law, Judges, M.R. Shah, Parole, Prison Administration

Supreme Court Orders Surrender of Prisoners Released on Emergency Parole During COVID-19 LEGAL ISSUE: Surrender of prisoners released on emergency parole or interim bail due to COVID-19 normalization. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: In Re: Contagion of Covid-19 Virus in Prisons Judgment Date: March 24, 2023 Date of the Judgment: March 24, 2023 Citation: [Not

Supreme Court Orders Surrender of Prisoners Released on Emergency Parole/Interim Bail During COVID-19 Pandemic Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Surrender of Prisoners Released on Emergency Parole During COVID-19 Pandemic: Director General (Prisons) vs. In Re: Contagion of Covid-19 Virus in Prisons (24 March 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 437, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Emergency Parole, Interim Bail, Judges, M. R. Shah, Suo Moto Writ Petition, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Orders Surrender of Prisoners Released on Emergency Parole During COVID-19 Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 294 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of whether prisoners released on emergency parole or interim bail during the COVID-19 pandemic should

Supreme Court Orders Surrender of Prisoners Released on Emergency Parole During COVID-19 Pandemic: Director General (Prisons) vs. In Re: Contagion of Covid-19 Virus in Prisons (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (24 March 2023)

/ Civil Procedure, Court Directions, Employee Dues, Execution of Orders, Judges, Krishna Murari, Labour Law, M.R. Shah, Wages and Salaries

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can long-pending dues of employees be finally settled? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Conversion for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Ministry of Urban Development (23 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Delhi Development Act 1957, Delhi Development Act 1957 with Section 11A(2), Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Conversion for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Ministry of Urban Development (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can direct the Union Ministry of Urban Development to convert land allotted for Supreme Court archives into a chamber block for lawyers. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Land Use, Administrative Law. Case

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Conversion for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Ministry of Urban Development (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Allotment for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Union of India (23 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Delhi Development Act, 1957, Delhi Development Act, 1957 with Section 11A, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Writ of Mandamus

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Allotment for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can issue a writ of mandamus to direct the Union Ministry of Urban Development to allot land for the construction of lawyers’ chambers. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Supreme Court Bar

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Allotment for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Union of India (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of resignation: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Kamlesh Rani Bhatla (23 March 2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 26, Judges, Krishna Murari, Resignation, Service Law, Withdrawal of Resignation

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2023) Date of the Judgment: 23 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 228 Judges: Aniruddha Bose, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can an employee withdraw their resignation after it has been accepted by the employer? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of resignation: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Kamlesh Rani Bhatla (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (23 March 2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 26, Judges, Krishna Murari, Procedural Compliance, Resignation, Service Law, Withdrawal of Resignation

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can withdraw their resignation after it has been accepted, particularly when the employer’s rejection was based on a different ground than the validity of the withdrawal itself. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (23 March 2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 144, D.Y. Chandrachud, Judges, M.R. Shah, Restitution

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the principle of restitution in cases where a court order is found to be erroneous. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited Judgment Date: 23 March 2023 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top