Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Attachment: Neeraja Pipes Case (2023) INSC 236

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Attachment: Neeraja Pipes Case (2023) INSC 236 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tax attachment order can be enforced if the assessment orders were not served to the assessee. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: The Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. vs. Neeraja Pipes Pvt. Ltd. Judgment Date: 15 March 2023 Date of […]

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Attachment: Neeraja Pipes Case (2023) INSC 236 Read Post »

Supreme Court settles liability of Directors under Section 138 NI Act post IBC Resolution: Ajay Kumar Goenka vs. Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. (2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 NI Act Post IBC Resolution Date of the Judgment: March 15, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 218 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. and Abhay S. Oka, J. (Majority Opinion by Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Concurring Opinion by J.B. Pardiwala, J.) Can a director of a company be held liable

Supreme Court settles liability of Directors under Section 138 NI Act post IBC Resolution: Ajay Kumar Goenka vs. Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. (2023) Read Post »

Liability of Directors under Section 138 NI Act: Supreme Court Judgment on IBC Resolution Plans (March 15, 2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability of Directors in Cheque Dishonor Cases Post IBC Resolution Date of the Judgment: March 15, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 232 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. and Abhay S. Oka, J. (authored by Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.) and J.B. Pardiwala, J. (Concurring Opinion) Can a director of a company be held liable

Liability of Directors under Section 138 NI Act: Supreme Court Judgment on IBC Resolution Plans (March 15, 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on DPC Date, Not Vacancy Date: Manoj Kumar Jindal vs. Rajni Mahajan & Ors. (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on DPC Date, Not Vacancy Date: Manoj Kumar Jindal vs. Rajni Mahajan & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether promotion should be based on the date of vacancy or the date of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meeting. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Manoj Kumar Jindal vs. Rajni Mahajan &

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on DPC Date, Not Vacancy Date: Manoj Kumar Jindal vs. Rajni Mahajan & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on weak extra-judicial confession: Pawan Kumar Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (2023)

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on weak extra-judicial confession: Pawan Kumar Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Evidentiary value of extra-judicial confessions in criminal cases. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Pawan Kumar Chourasia vs. State of Bihar Judgment Date: 14 March 2023 Date of the Judgment: 14 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on weak extra-judicial confession: Pawan Kumar Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused Based on Weak Extra-Judicial Confession: Pawan Kumar Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (2023)

Supreme Court Acquits Accused Based on Weak Extra-Judicial Confession: Pawan Kumar Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Evidentiary value of extra-judicial confession in a criminal trial. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Pawan Kumar Chourasia vs. State of Bihar Judgment Date: March 14, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 14, 2023 Citation: 2023

Supreme Court Acquits Accused Based on Weak Extra-Judicial Confession: Pawan Kumar Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies NGT Order on Consent for Petroleum Outlets: Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs. V.B.R. Menon & Others (2023) INSC 227 (14 March 2023)

Supreme Court Modifies NGT Order on Consent for Petroleum Outlets Date of the Judgment: 14 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 227 Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice J.B. Pardiwala Can the National Green Tribunal (NGT) mandate that all petroleum retail outlets obtain “Consent to Establish” (CTE) and “Consent to Operate” (CTO)? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Modifies NGT Order on Consent for Petroleum Outlets: Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs. V.B.R. Menon & Others (2023) INSC 227 (14 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies consent requirements for retail petroleum outlets: Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs. V.B.R. Menon & Others (2023) INSC 231 (14 March 2023)

Supreme Court on Consent Requirements for Retail Petroleum Outlets Date of the Judgment: 14 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 231 Judges: Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia Can the National Green Tribunal (NGT) mandate that all retail petroleum outlets obtain “Consent to Establish” (CTE) and “Consent to Operate” (CTO)? The Supreme Court recently addressed this

Supreme Court clarifies consent requirements for retail petroleum outlets: Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs. V.B.R. Menon & Others (2023) INSC 231 (14 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows amendment of pleadings in mortgage redemption suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023)

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings in Mortgage Redemption Suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plaintiff can amend their plaint to include alternative and potentially inconsistent pleas, particularly in a suit involving mortgage redemption and tenancy disputes. CASE TYPE: Civil (Mortgage Redemption, Tenancy Dispute) Case Name: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar

Supreme Court allows amendment of pleadings in mortgage redemption suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bhopal Gas Tragedy Settlement, Dismisses Curative Petition: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Bhopal Gas Tragedy Settlement, Dismisses Curative Petition: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 14, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 228 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J., Abhay S. Oka, J., Vikram Nath, J., and J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can a decades-old settlement, reached to provide

Supreme Court Upholds Bhopal Gas Tragedy Settlement, Dismisses Curative Petition: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023)

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can re-examine a settlement reached in a case of mass disaster, specifically concerning the adequacy of compensation, after a lapse of several years and multiple reviews. CASE TYPE: Civil (Curative Petition)

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Assets in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Assets in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether development rights of a corporate debtor over a property can be considered as an asset during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Victory Iron Works Ltd.

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Assets in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top