Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Conservative Valuation for Captive Consumption: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. J.R. Organics Ltd. (2023)

/ Central Excise Law, Central Excise Law with Rule 6(b)(i), Central Excise Rules, 1944, Central Excise Rules, 1944 with Rule 6(b)(i), Central Excise Rules, 1944 with Rule 6(p)(ii), Dipankar Datta, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Valuation of Excisable Goods

Supreme Court Upholds Conservative Valuation for Captive Consumption: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. J.R. Organics Ltd. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the correct valuation method for excisable goods used for captive consumption. CASE TYPE: Central Excise Law Case Name: Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad vs. M/S J.R. Organics Ltd. Judgment Date: 01 March 2023 Date […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conservative Valuation for Captive Consumption: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. J.R. Organics Ltd. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies exemption for Cutter Suction Dredger components under Customs Act: M/S Dharti Dredging and Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (2023) INSC 176 (01 March 2023)

/ Chapter Heading 8905 10 00, Customs Law, Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with Section XVII, Dipankar Datta, Exemptions under Customs Law, Interpretation of Customs Law, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Clarifies Exemption for Cutter Suction Dredger Components Under Customs Act Date of the Judgment: 01 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 176 Judges: S. Ravindra Bhat, J., Dipankar Datta, J. Can parts of a machine be considered separate articles for the purpose of customs duty exemptions? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court clarifies exemption for Cutter Suction Dredger components under Customs Act: M/S Dharti Dredging and Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (2023) INSC 176 (01 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Exemption for Cutter Dredger Components: Dharti Dredging vs. Commissioner of Customs (2023)

/ Customs Duty, Customs Law, Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Dipankar Datta, Exemptions, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Clarifies Exemption for Cutter Dredger Components: Dharti Dredging vs. Commissioner of Customs (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether certain imported components are integral parts of a Cutter Suction Dredger and thus eligible for a customs duty exemption. CASE TYPE: Customs Law Case Name: M/s Dharti Dredging and Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central

Supreme Court Clarifies Exemption for Cutter Dredger Components: Dharti Dredging vs. Commissioner of Customs (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes FIR in property dispute case: Sarabjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 506, Judges, Rajesh Bindal, Specific Performance

Supreme Court quashes FIR in property dispute case: Sarabjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal prosecution for cheating can arise from a breach of contract in a property sale agreement. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Sarabjit Kaur vs. The State of Punjab & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 1 March 2023 Introduction

Supreme Court quashes FIR in property dispute case: Sarabjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes FIR in property dispute case: Sarabjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 506, Judges, Quashing of FIR, Rajesh Bindal

Supreme Court quashes FIR in property dispute case: Sarabjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab (2023) Date of the Judgment: 01 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 188 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Rajesh Bindal Can a criminal case be initiated for a breach of contract? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question

Supreme Court quashes FIR in property dispute case: Sarabjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reinstates Complaints Dismissed for Non-Appearance in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/s. BLS Infrastructure Limited vs. M/s. Rajwant Singh & Others (2023) INSC 177 (01 March 2023)

/ Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 256, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 311, Judges, Manoj Misra, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Reinstates Complaints Dismissed for Non-Appearance in Cheque Bounce Cases Date of the Judgment: 01 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 177 Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Manoj Misra Can a criminal complaint be dismissed for the complainant’s absence even after their evidence has been recorded? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Reinstates Complaints Dismissed for Non-Appearance in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/s. BLS Infrastructure Limited vs. M/s. Rajwant Singh & Others (2023) INSC 177 (01 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for dismissal of complaints under Section 256 CrPC: BLS Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Rajwant Singh & Ors. (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 256, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 311, Dismissal of Complaint, Judges, Manoj Misra, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court on Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Appearance of Complainant Date of the Judgment: March 1, 2023Citation: 2023 INSC 1872Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Manoj Misra Can a criminal complaint be dismissed solely for the complainant’s absence, even after their evidence has been recorded? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for dismissal of complaints under Section 256 CrPC: BLS Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Rajwant Singh & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe in NDPS Case, Upholds Trial Court Proceedings

/ A.S. Bopanna, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 227, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 22, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 29

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe in NDPS Case, Upholds Trial Court Proceedings LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a case warrants investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) based on allegations of illegal detention and a foisted case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, NDPS Act Case Name:

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe in NDPS Case, Upholds Trial Court Proceedings Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Indrajit Das vs. State of Tripura (28 February 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Indrajit Das vs. State of Tripura (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution successfully proved the guilt of the accused in a case based on circumstantial evidence where key links are missing. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Indrajit Das vs. The State of

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Indrajit Das vs. State of Tripura (28 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Governor’s duty to summon assembly on the advice of the Council of Ministers: State of Punjab vs. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab (2023) INSC 157

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 167, Constitutional Law with Article 174, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court settles Governor’s duty to summon assembly on the advice of the Council of Ministers: State of Punjab vs. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab (2023) INSC 157 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Governor is bound to summon the State Legislative Assembly on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court settles Governor’s duty to summon assembly on the advice of the Council of Ministers: State of Punjab vs. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab (2023) INSC 157 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Police Decision on Criminal Background: Imtiyaz Ahmad Malla vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (28 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Employment, Forest Act, Forest Act with Section 6, Judges, Offences Against Property, Police Recruitment, Ranbir Penal Code, Ranbir Penal Code with Section 379, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Police Decision on Criminal Background: Imtiyaz Ahmad Malla vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a police department can deny employment to an individual based on their criminal background, even after an acquittal. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Imtiyaz Ahmad Malla vs. The State of Jammu and Kashmir

Supreme Court Upholds Police Decision on Criminal Background: Imtiyaz Ahmad Malla vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (28 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Police Decision on Criminal Antecedents in Recruitment: Imtiyaz Ahmad Malla vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Criminal Antecedents, Forest Act, Forest Act with Section 6, Honorable Acquittal, Judges, Police Recruitment, Ranbir Penal Code, 1932, Ranbir Penal Code, 1932 with Section 379, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Police Decision on Criminal Antecedents in Recruitment: Imtiyaz Ahmad Malla vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a police department can deny employment to an individual based on a past criminal case, even if the individual was later acquitted. CASE TYPE: Service Law, specifically relating to police recruitment. Case

Supreme Court Upholds Police Decision on Criminal Antecedents in Recruitment: Imtiyaz Ahmad Malla vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top