Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizing Common Intention: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad Bai (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizing Common Intention: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad Bai (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in acquitting the accused based on a lack of proof of common intention in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizing Common Intention: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad Bai (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizing Common Intention: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad Bai (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizing Common Intention: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad Bai (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in acquitting the accused based on lack of proof of common intention in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizing Common Intention: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad Bai (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh (24 February 2023)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh: Supreme Court on Land Acquisition Lapse Date of the Judgment: 24 February 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1301 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 3854 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 7205 OF 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Land Used Without Acquisition: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Rajiv (2023)

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Land Used Without Acquisition: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Rajiv (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a landowner is entitled to compensation when their land is used for public purposes without formal acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. vs. Rajiv and Anr. [Judgment Date]: February

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Land Used Without Acquisition: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Rajiv (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Jai Prakash Tyagi & Ors. (24 February 2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Jai Prakash Tyagi & Ors. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24 February 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1300 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) No. 3853 of 2023) (@ Diary No. 9801 of 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Jai Prakash Tyagi & Ors. (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Jai Prakash Tyagi (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Jai Prakash Tyagi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid, or vice-versa. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Jai Prakash Tyagi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Public Use: State of Haryana vs. Niranjan Singh (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Public Use: State of Haryana vs. Niranjan Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State can refuse to release acquired land when a significant portion of similarly situated lands has already been released. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Niranjan Singh & Ors. Etc.

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Public Use: State of Haryana vs. Niranjan Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Public Use, Reverses High Court Order: State of Haryana vs. Niranjan Singh (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Public Use, Reverses High Court Order: State of Haryana vs. Niranjan Singh (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 167 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a state government selectively release acquired land, favoring some landowners over others? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Public Use, Reverses High Court Order: State of Haryana vs. Niranjan Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case: Roopwanti vs. State of Haryana (24 February 2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case: Roopwanti vs. State of Haryana (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24th February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 137 Judges: Justice Krishna Murari and Justice B.V. Nagarathna Can a higher court overturn an acquittal by a lower court? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question while hearing an appeal against

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case: Roopwanti vs. State of Haryana (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case: Roopwanti vs. State of Haryana (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case: Roopwanti vs. State of Haryana (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Standards for reversing acquittals in criminal appeals. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Roopwanti vs. State of Haryana. Judgment Date: 24th February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 24th February 2023. Citation: 2023 INSC 157. Judges: Hon’ble Justices Krishna Murari and

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case: Roopwanti vs. State of Haryana (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Review Jurisdiction in Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. (2023)

Supreme Court Limits Review Jurisdiction in Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Property Dispute Case Name: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: February

Supreme Court Limits Review Jurisdiction in Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court’s Review Order on Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan (24 February 2023)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court’s Review Order on Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Property Dispute. Case Name: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. Judgment Date: 24

Supreme Court Overturns High Court’s Review Order on Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top