Judges

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Against Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 324, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 365, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Against Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a constitutional court can order further investigation in a criminal case after a charge sheet has been filed and charges have been framed. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. The […]

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Against Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Further Investigation, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 326, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 367, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can deny further investigation in a criminal case where the initial investigation was allegedly biased and incomplete, even after a charge sheet has been filed and charges have been framed. CASE

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences under PMLA, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 to anticipatory bail applications. CASE TYPE: Criminal (Money Laundering) Case Name: The Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy & Anr. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 45 PMLA in Anticipatory Bail: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (2023)

/ Anticipatory Bail, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Judges, M.R. Shah, Money Laundering, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 45 PMLA in Anticipatory Bail: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) to anticipatory bail applications under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). CASE TYPE: Criminal (Money Laundering) Case

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 45 PMLA in Anticipatory Bail: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Amit Jain (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Physical Possession, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Amit Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding the lapse of land acquisition proceedings due to non-payment of compensation or

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Amit Jain (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Amit Jain (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Amit Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding lapse of land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Amit Jain & Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Amit Jain (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside DPC for Assistant Registrar post due to uncommunicated ACRs: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Judges, M.R. Shah, Promotion, Service Law, Service Law with Rules 1967, Service Law with Rules 2020

Supreme Court sets aside DPC for Assistant Registrar post due to uncommunicated ACRs: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) can be considered for promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur Judgment Date: 24 February 2023 Date

Supreme Court sets aside DPC for Assistant Registrar post due to uncommunicated ACRs: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes DPC for Assistant Registrar Post: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC), Judges, M.R. Shah, Promotion, Service Law, Service Law with Annual Confidential Report (ACR)

Supreme Court Quashes DPC for Assistant Registrar Post: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and ACRs communicated just before a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meeting can be considered for promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur

Supreme Court Quashes DPC for Assistant Registrar Post: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession has been taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr. vs. Subhash Chander Khatri & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 February 2023

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite the government taking possession of the land. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr. vs. Subhash Chander Khatri & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Lokayukta’s Power to Order Preliminary Inquiry: Office of the Odisha Lokayukta vs. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi (23 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Bias, Judges, Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014, Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014 with Section 20(1), Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014 with Section 25, Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014 with Section 28, Principles of Natural Justice, Right to Hearing

Supreme Court Upholds Lokayukta’s Power to Order Preliminary Inquiry: Office of the Odisha Lokayukta vs. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi (23 February 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Odisha Lokayukta can direct the Directorate of Vigilance to conduct a preliminary inquiry under Section 20(1) of the Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014. CASE TYPE: Corruption/Public Servant Case Name: Office

Supreme Court Upholds Lokayukta’s Power to Order Preliminary Inquiry: Office of the Odisha Lokayukta vs. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi (23 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute (23 Feb 2023)

/ All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Civil Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Hrishikesh Roy, Interim Injunction, Internal Management of Political Party, Judges, Rule 19(vii), AIADMK Byelaws, Rule 20A, AIADMK Byelaws

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute (23 Feb 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Internal management and leadership disputes within a political party. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Thiru K. Palaniswamy vs. M. Shanmugam & Ors. Judgment Date: 23 February 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute (23 Feb 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top