Judges

Supreme Court Reduces Compensation for Land Acquisition in Haryana: HSIIDC vs. Satpal (2023)

Supreme Court Reduces Compensation for Land Acquisition in Haryana: HSIIDC vs. Satpal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Others vs. Satpal & Others Etc. Etc. Judgment Date: 09 February 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 09 […]

Supreme Court Reduces Compensation for Land Acquisition in Haryana: HSIIDC vs. Satpal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “Charitable Purpose” under the Kerala Building Tax Act: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023) INSC 98 (9 February 2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Charitable Purpose” Under Kerala Building Tax Act Date of the Judgment: 9 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 98 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J, J B Pardiwala, J Can the term “charitable purpose” be narrowly defined only as “relief of the poor and free medical relief” under the

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “Charitable Purpose” under the Kerala Building Tax Act: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023) INSC 98 (9 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ‘Charitable Purpose’ under Kerala Building Tax Act in exemption claims: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Charitable Purpose’ Under Kerala Building Tax Act: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: What constitutes “charitable purpose” for exemption under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975? CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: M/s Lisie Medical Institutions vs. The State of Kerala & Ors. Judgment Date: February 9, 2023

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ‘Charitable Purpose’ under Kerala Building Tax Act in exemption claims: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles gratuity eligibility for deceased employees: State of U.P. vs. Smt. Priyanka (2023)

Supreme Court rules on gratuity for deceased employee’s family: State of UP vs. Smt. Priyanka (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the family of a deceased employee is entitled to gratuity when the employee dies before opting for retirement at the age of 60 years. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: State of U.P. and Ors. vs.

Supreme Court settles gratuity eligibility for deceased employees: State of U.P. vs. Smt. Priyanka (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Regularization for Daily Wage Employee: Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Regularization for Daily Wage Employee: Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a daily wage employee is entitled to regularization without a sanctioned post and appointment by a competent authority. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Regularization for Daily Wage Employee: Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court restricts refund of transportation charges in GAIL vs. IPCL case

Supreme Court Restricts Refund in GAIL vs. IPCL Case on Transportation Charges LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a public sector undertaking can levy transportation charges on another when the latter is mandated to use its own pipelines. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: M/S. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED vs. M/S. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORP. LTD. & ORS.

Supreme Court restricts refund of transportation charges in GAIL vs. IPCL case Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Challenge to GAIL’s Transportation Charges: GAIL vs. IPCL (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Challenge to GAIL’s Transportation Charges: GAIL vs. IPCL (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Public Sector Undertaking can levy transportation charges on another entity when that entity is mandated to use its own infrastructure for gas transportation. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: M/S. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED vs. M/S. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS

Supreme Court Upholds Challenge to GAIL’s Transportation Charges: GAIL vs. IPCL (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Company Secretary in Buyback Compliance: SEBI vs. V Shankar (2023)

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Company Secretary in Buyback Compliance: SEBI vs. V Shankar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: The extent of responsibility of a Company Secretary in ensuring compliance with buyback regulations. CASE TYPE: Securities Law Case Name: Securities and Exchange Board of India vs. V Shankar Judgment Date: 8 February 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Company Secretary in Buyback Compliance: SEBI vs. V Shankar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies insurance policy terms in election duty death: National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Chief Electoral Officer (2023)

Supreme Court clarifies insurance policy terms in election duty death: National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Chief Electoral Officer (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of insurance policy terms, specifically the scope of “accident caused by external violent and any other visible means.” CASE TYPE: Insurance Law Case Name: National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. The Chief Electoral Officer

Supreme Court clarifies insurance policy terms in election duty death: National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Chief Electoral Officer (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023)

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of adequate compensation for deficiency in service in a consumer dispute. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection. Case Name: ITC Limited vs. Aashna Roy. Judgment Date: 7th February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 7th February 2023. Citation: [Not Available in Source]. Judges:

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revisits Consumer Compensation in Haircut Mishap Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023)

Supreme Court Revisits Consumer Compensation in Haircut Mishap Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of adequate compensation for deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, specifically concerning claims for mental trauma, loss of income, and pain and suffering. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: ITC Limited vs. Aashna Roy [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Revisits Consumer Compensation in Haircut Mishap Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in money laundering cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023)

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in money laundering cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the territorial jurisdiction of Special Courts in cases of money laundering. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement Judgment Date: 7 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 7 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in money laundering cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top