Judges

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is deposited in the Reference […]

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Reference Court, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is deposited in the Reference Court but not directly paid to landowners and if possession is taken by drawing a panchnama. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua and Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles: Subsequent purchasers lack standing to challenge land acquisition lapse in Delhi Development Authority vs. Asha Prakash (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Lapse Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 364 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 1501 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 6082 OF 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who buys land after it has been

Supreme Court settles: Subsequent purchasers lack standing to challenge land acquisition lapse in Delhi Development Authority vs. Asha Prakash (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Acquisition Lapse (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Acquisition Lapse LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the right to challenge the acquisition of that land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, claiming it has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Acquisition Lapse (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not tendered to a person claiming a share in the land, particularly when possession has been taken and the claimant’s ownership is not established. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi: Supreme Court on Land Acquisition Lapse LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi and Ors. Judgment Date: 20 January 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017 with Clause 38(v), C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 43 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a Public Service Commission award pro-rata marks to all candidates when answer keys are found to be wrong? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, C.T. Ravikumar, Clause 38(v), Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Examination, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation, Service Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can order re-evaluation of answer sheets when a Public Service Commission has already awarded pro-rata marks for questions with incorrect answer keys. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Public

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Om Prakash Case (20 January 2023)

/ Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Om Prakash Case (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not fully tendered. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Secretary, Land &

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Om Prakash Case (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Om Prakash (2023) INSC 71

/ Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Om Prakash (2023) INSC 71 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not fully paid. CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Om Prakash (2023) INSC 71 Read Post »

Supreme Court settles applicability of ESI Act post amendment in establishments: ESI Corporation vs. Radhika Theatre (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 1, Judges, M. R. Shah, Social Security Legislation

ESI Act Applicability: Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Application of Amended Section 1(6) for Establishments Post-1989 Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 312 of 2023 (@ SLP(C) No. 12520 of 2022) Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can an establishment, once covered under the Employees’ State Insurance (ESI)

Supreme Court settles applicability of ESI Act post amendment in establishments: ESI Corporation vs. Radhika Theatre (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top