Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies ESI Act Applicability for Establishments Post 1989: ESI Corporation vs. Radhika Theatre (2023) INSC 602 (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 1(6), ESI Coverage, Judges, M. R. Shah, Social Security Legislation

ESI Act Applicability: Supreme Court Clarifies Coverage for Establishments Post 1989 LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Employees’ State Insurance (ESI) Act, 1948 to establishments with fluctuating employee numbers after the 1989 amendment. CASE TYPE: Social Security Law Case Name: The ESI Corporation vs. M/s. Radhika Theatre [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2023 Introduction Date of the […]

Supreme Court Clarifies ESI Act Applicability for Establishments Post 1989: ESI Corporation vs. Radhika Theatre (2023) INSC 602 (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Temporary Land Acquisition: Supreme Court Limits Duration in Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (20 January 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 35, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Property, Temporary Land Acquisition

Supreme Court on Temporary Land Acquisition: Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Can temporary land acquisition continue indefinitely, infringing on property rights? CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Manubhai Sendhabhai Bharwad and Another vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Others Judgment Date: 20 January 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 January

Temporary Land Acquisition: Supreme Court Limits Duration in Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Award, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 360 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 1493 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 22629 OF 2021) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Date of the Judgment: January 20, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 64 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who is not the original landowner challenge a land acquisition? This question was

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 11, Land Acquisition Law with Section 18(a), M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a State Government is entitled to compensation, in addition to royalty, when its land is acquired under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Coal Land Acquisition: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 with Section 18(a), Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 with Section 2(d), Judges, Land Acquisition, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Coal Land Acquisition: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State Government is entitled to compensation for land acquired under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, in addition to royalty payments. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Mining Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Coal Land Acquisition: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession is taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession is taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 January 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows additional evidence in Arbitration cases: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34(2)(a), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34(2)(b), C.T. Ravikumar, Indian Contract Act, Indian Contract Act with Section 56, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Arbitration Case: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an applicant can be permitted to adduce additional evidence to support their case in an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically concerning public policy grounds. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/s Alpine

Supreme Court allows additional evidence in Arbitration cases: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, C.T. Ravikumar, Indian Contract Act, Indian Contract Act with Section 56, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Policy

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party can adduce evidence to support a challenge to an arbitral award based on public policy grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/s Alpine Housing Development

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction can be upheld based on circumstantial evidence, particularly when the cause of death is not definitively established, and the primary evidence includes the recovery of the body and stolen property at the instance of

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction can be upheld based on circumstantial evidence, even when the cause of death is not definitively established by a post-mortem report. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: John Anthonisamy @ John vs. State, Rep. by

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top