Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 to factories run by local authorities: Employees’ State Insurance Corporation vs. Kakinada Municipality & Ors. (28 September 2021)

/ Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 1(4), Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 75, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 90, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Clarifies ESI Act Applicability to Local Authority Factories LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a factory run by a local authority is covered under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) and whether the Employees Insurance Court has the power to grant exemptions under the Act. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Employees’ State Insurance […]

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 to factories run by local authorities: Employees’ State Insurance Corporation vs. Kakinada Municipality & Ors. (28 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan High Court’s Decision to Deny Civil Judge Post Based on Criminal Antecedents: Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur vs. Akashdeep Morya & Anr. (2021) INSC 581 (16 September 2021)

/ Civil Judge, Criminal Antecedents, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 341, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges, Judicial Appointments, K.M. Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Suitability Assessment

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan High Court’s Decision to Deny Civil Judge Post Based on Criminal Antecedents Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 581 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J. and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a High Court interfere with the decision of a committee to deny a judicial post to a candidate

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan High Court’s Decision to Deny Civil Judge Post Based on Criminal Antecedents: Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur vs. Akashdeep Morya & Anr. (2021) INSC 581 (16 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the threshold for summoning additional accused under Section 319 CrPC: Ramesh Chandra Srivastava vs. State of U.P. (2021)

/ Additional Accused, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 319, Criminal Law, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Summons

Supreme Court on Summons under Section 319 CrPC: Ramesh Chandra Srivastava vs. State of U.P. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: What is the threshold for a court to summon a person as an additional accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)? CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Ramesh Chandra Srivastava vs. The State

Supreme Court clarifies the threshold for summoning additional accused under Section 319 CrPC: Ramesh Chandra Srivastava vs. State of U.P. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Termination: Ranbir Singh vs. Executive Engineer PWD (2021)

/ Daily Wage Workers, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Labour Law, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Reinstatement, Retrenchment

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Termination: Ranbir Singh vs. Executive Engineer PWD (2021) Date of the Judgment: September 2, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 580 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J. and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a daily wage worker, whose services were terminated in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act,

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Termination: Ranbir Singh vs. Executive Engineer PWD (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top