Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court clarifies appointment process for teachers in minority institutions: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Rachna Hills (27 April 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 30, D.Y. Chandrachud, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Regulations under the Intermediate Education Act 1921, Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921, Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 with Section 16-FF

Supreme Court Clarifies Teacher Appointment Process in UP Minority Institutions Date of the Judgment: 27 April 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 4412 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a teacher’s appointment in a minority institution be considered final without the mandatory approval of the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS)? The Supreme […]

Supreme Court clarifies appointment process for teachers in minority institutions: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Rachna Hills (27 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Telangana High Court Order on CBI Investigation: Suneetha Narreddy vs. Y S Avinash Reddy & Anr (2023) INSC 345 (24 April 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 160, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173(8), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Sets Aside Telangana High Court Order on CBI Investigation: Suneetha Narreddy vs. Y S Avinash Reddy & Anr (2023) INSC 345 (24 April 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can dictate the manner of investigation by directing that questioning be in printed/written form and by providing a questionnaire to the suspect. CASE

Supreme Court Sets Aside Telangana High Court Order on CBI Investigation: Suneetha Narreddy vs. Y S Avinash Reddy & Anr (2023) INSC 345 (24 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (17 April 2023)

/ Afforestation, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Environmental Law, Environmental Law with Specific Directions, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Public Interest Litigation, Public Interest Litigation with Aarey Forest, Public Interest Litigation with Mumbai Metro, Tree Felling

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) could fell more trees than initially permitted by the Supreme Court for the Mumbai Metro Line-3 project. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (17 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Felling of 177 Trees for Mumbai Metro Project Despite Initial Order

/ Afforestation, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Environmental Law, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Order of Court, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Public Interest Litigation, Tree Felling

Supreme Court Allows Felling of 177 Trees for Mumbai Metro Project Despite Initial Order LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) could fell more trees than initially permitted by the Supreme Court for the Metro Car Shed Land at Aarey Colony. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: In Re: Felling of

Supreme Court Allows Felling of 177 Trees for Mumbai Metro Project Despite Initial Order Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Arbitrability of Disputes After Settlement Agreement in NTPC vs. SPML Case (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6A), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Settles Arbitrability of Disputes After Settlement Agreement in NTPC vs. SPML Case (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute can be referred to arbitration after a settlement agreement has been reached and implemented by the parties. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: NTPC Ltd. vs. M/S SPML Infra Ltd. Judgment Date: 10 April 2023

Supreme Court Settles Arbitrability of Disputes After Settlement Agreement in NTPC vs. SPML Case (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles arbitrability of disputes after settlement agreement in NTPC vs. SPML case (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Contract Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dispute Resolution, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Settlement Agreement

Supreme Court Settles Arbitrability of Disputes After Settlement Agreement in NTPC vs. SPML Case (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute is arbitrable after a settlement agreement has been executed and acted upon by the parties. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: NTPC LTD. vs. M/S SPML INFRA LTD. Judgment Date: 10 April 2023 Date of

Supreme Court settles arbitrability of disputes after settlement agreement in NTPC vs. SPML case (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023)

/ Debt Recovery Tribunals, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, E-filing, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Procedural Law, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993 with Section 36

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mandatory e-filing of pleadings at Debt Recovery Tribunals and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals is justified, considering the digital divide in India. CASE TYPE: Writ Petition (Civil) – Service Law, Technology Law, and Procedural Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993 with Section 36

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mandatory e-filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs) is valid, considering the digital divide in the country. CASE TYPE: Civil, focused on procedural aspects of debt recovery

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Open Ballot System for Rajya Sabha Elections: Lok Prahari vs. Union of India (27 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 80, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Representation of the People Act, 1951, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 123, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 33, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 59

Supreme Court Upholds Open Ballot System for Rajya Sabha Elections: Lok Prahari vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the open ballot system for Rajya Sabha elections and the requirement for independent candidates to have ten proposers are constitutionally valid. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Election Law Case Name: Lok Prahari vs. Union of India

Supreme Court Upholds Open Ballot System for Rajya Sabha Elections: Lok Prahari vs. Union of India (27 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Conversion for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Ministry of Urban Development (23 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Delhi Development Act 1957, Delhi Development Act 1957 with Section 11A(2), Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Conversion for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Ministry of Urban Development (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can direct the Union Ministry of Urban Development to convert land allotted for Supreme Court archives into a chamber block for lawyers. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Land Use, Administrative Law. Case

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Conversion for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Ministry of Urban Development (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Allotment for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Union of India (23 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Delhi Development Act, 1957, Delhi Development Act, 1957 with Section 11A, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Writ of Mandamus

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Allotment for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can issue a writ of mandamus to direct the Union Ministry of Urban Development to allot land for the construction of lawyers’ chambers. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Supreme Court Bar

Supreme Court Refuses to Direct Land Allotment for Lawyers’ Chambers: SCBA vs. Union of India (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State (21 March 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 235, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 145, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 65B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 364A, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of death penalty and consideration of mitigating circumstances. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State by Inspector of Police. Judgment Date: 21 March 2023. Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21 March 2023 Citation:

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State (21 March 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top