Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court settles Compensation Apportionment under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436

/ Appeals, Civil Procedure, Compensation Apportionment, Impleadment of Parties, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30, M.R. Shah, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Settles Compensation Apportionment Under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436 LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute regarding the apportionment of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. and Others Judgment Date: […]

Supreme Court settles Compensation Apportionment under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436 Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Project Affected Families in Narmada Bachao Andolan Case (22 September 2022)

/ Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Project Affected Families in Narmada Bachao Andolan Case (22 September 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification of compensation for project-affected families. CASE TYPE: Civil, Resettlement and Rehabilitation. Case Name: Narmada Bachao Andolan and Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 22 September 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 22 September

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Project Affected Families in Narmada Bachao Andolan Case (22 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Bonded Labour Act: Selvakumar vs. Manjula (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Acquittal, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 with Section 16, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 with Section 17, Criminal Appeals, Criminal Law, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Bonded Labour Act: Selvakumar vs. Manjula (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the son of a business owner can be held liable for offences under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, solely based on his relationship with the owner and the business’s name. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Selvakumar vs.

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Bonded Labour Act: Selvakumar vs. Manjula (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes Pharmacy Council of India’s moratorium on new pharmacy colleges: Pharmacy Council of India vs. Rajeev College of Pharmacy (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 13, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(g), Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court quashes Pharmacy Council of India’s moratorium on new pharmacy colleges: Pharmacy Council of India vs. Rajeev College of Pharmacy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) can impose a moratorium on the establishment of new pharmacy colleges through an executive resolution. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Pharmacy Council of

Supreme Court quashes Pharmacy Council of India’s moratorium on new pharmacy colleges: Pharmacy Council of India vs. Rajeev College of Pharmacy (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes disproportionate assets case, emphasizes scrutiny at discharge stage: Kanchan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 227, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2)

Supreme Court quashes disproportionate assets case, emphasizes scrutiny at discharge stage: Kanchan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person should be discharged from a case of possessing assets disproportionate to their known income if there are glaring errors in the calculation of income and expenditure by the prosecution. CASE TYPE: Criminal

Supreme Court quashes disproportionate assets case, emphasizes scrutiny at discharge stage: Kanchan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Pension and Terminal Benefits Based on CAT Orders for Merged Language Cadre: R.D. Kaushal vs Union of India (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Central Administrative Tribunal, Central Administrative Tribunal with orders of 26th May 2008, Central Administrative Tribunal with orders of 7th July 2010, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Pension, Service Law, Service Law with Research and Analysis Wing (Recruitment, Cadre and Service) Rules, 1975, Terminal Benefits

Supreme Court Orders Pension and Terminal Benefits Based on CAT Orders for Merged Language Cadre: R.D. Kaushal vs Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the merger of two cadres should impact the terminal benefits and pension of employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: R.D. Kaushal and Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors.

Supreme Court Orders Pension and Terminal Benefits Based on CAT Orders for Merged Language Cadre: R.D. Kaushal vs Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Patricide Case: Chherturam vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 86, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Patricide Case: Chherturam vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the crime of patricide committed during a sudden fight under the influence of alcohol falls under the exception of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Chherturam @ Chainu vs. State of Chhattisgarh.

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Patricide Case: Chherturam vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies lease agreement and mesne profits in property dispute: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Sudera Realty Private Limited (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 2(12), Judges, K.M. Joseph, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 51, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 106, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 111, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 113

Supreme Court clarifies lease agreement and mesne profits in property dispute: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Sudera Realty Private Limited (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 6, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 784 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J. and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a lease agreement be considered valid even if a formal deed was not

Supreme Court clarifies lease agreement and mesne profits in property dispute: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Sudera Realty Private Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence: Khema @ Khem Chandra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Evidence Act, 1872, Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence: Khema @ Khem Chandra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Evaluation of witness testimony and the evidentiary value of recoveries in a criminal trial. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Murder Case Name: Khema @ Khem Chandra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Judgment

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence: Khema @ Khem Chandra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of the Limitation Act, 1963 in cases under the Carriage by Air Act, 1972: M/S Bhagwandas B . Ramchandani vs. British Airways (29 July 2022)

/ Carriage by Air Act, 1972, Carriage by Air Act, 1972 with Rule 30, International Conventions, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29(2), Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 3, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation in Air Carriage: Bhagwandas B. Ramchandani vs. British Airways (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Limitation Act, 1963 to the period specified in Rule 30 of the Second Schedule of the Carriage by Air Act, 1972. CASE TYPE: Carriage by Air/Commercial Law Case Name: M/S Bhagwandas B . Ramchandani vs. British

Supreme Court settles the applicability of the Limitation Act, 1963 in cases under the Carriage by Air Act, 1972: M/S Bhagwandas B . Ramchandani vs. British Airways (29 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court upholds acquittal in murder case based on weak extra-judicial confession: State of Rajasthan vs. Kistoora Ram (28 July 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Evidence Law, Extra-Judicial Confession, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court upholds acquittal in murder case based on weak extra-judicial confession: State of Rajasthan vs. Kistoora Ram (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction can be solely based on an extra-judicial confession without corroborating evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: State of Rajasthan vs. Kistoora Ram Judgment Date: 28 July 2022 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court upholds acquittal in murder case based on weak extra-judicial confession: State of Rajasthan vs. Kistoora Ram (28 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Section 477A: Shiv Kumar Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan (28 July 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 477A, Judges, Offences Relating to Documents and Property Marks, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d)(ii), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 15

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Section 477A: Shiv Kumar Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 618 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a public servant be convicted for corruption and falsification of accounts without concrete

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Section 477A: Shiv Kumar Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan (28 July 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top