Pankaj Mithal

Supreme Court Restricts Recall of Quashed FIRs Based on Compromise: Raghunath Sharma vs. State of Haryana (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 16, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 723 Judges: Pankaj Mithal J., Sanjay Karol J. Can a High Court restore a First Information Report (FIR) that was previously quashed based on a compromise between the involved parties? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question, focusing on the extent of […]

Supreme Court Restricts Recall of Quashed FIRs Based on Compromise: Raghunath Sharma vs. State of Haryana (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in gruesome murder case due to lack of evidence: Aejaz Ahmad Sheikh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (22 April 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 22 April 2025 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, Pankaj Mithal, Ahsanuddin Amanullah In a shocking case of family tragedy, the Supreme Court of India recently addressed the complexities of evidence and procedure in criminal trials. The case, Aejaz Ahmad Sheikh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, involved the death of a woman,

Supreme Court acquits accused in gruesome murder case due to lack of evidence: Aejaz Ahmad Sheikh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (22 April 2025) Read Post »

Breach of Contract Affirmed, Compensation Modified: Supreme Court’s Verdict in Larsen and Toubro Limited vs. Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 21, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 523 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. In complex real estate disputes, determining the extent of liability and appropriate compensation can be challenging. The Supreme Court of India recently addressed such a case, focusing on a breach of contract between Larsen and

Breach of Contract Affirmed, Compensation Modified: Supreme Court’s Verdict in Larsen and Toubro Limited vs. Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of res judicata in criminal proceedings and quashes cheating case: S.C. Garg vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025) INSC 493 (16 April 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 16 April 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 493 Judges: Pankaj Mithal, J., Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Can a person be prosecuted for cheating, when a court has already determined the facts in a prior criminal proceeding? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in S.C. Garg vs. State of

Supreme Court settles the applicability of res judicata in criminal proceedings and quashes cheating case: S.C. Garg vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025) INSC 493 (16 April 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles limitation period for declaration of Will as null and void: Nikhila Divyang Mehta vs. Hitesh P. Sanghvi (2025) INSC 485 (15 April 2025)

Date of the Judgment: 15 April 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 485 Judges: Pankaj Mithal, J., S.V.N. Bhatti, J. When does the clock start ticking for a lawsuit seeking to nullify a Will? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Nikhila Divyang Mehta & Anr. vs. Hitesh P. Sanghvi &

Supreme Court settles limitation period for declaration of Will as null and void: Nikhila Divyang Mehta vs. Hitesh P. Sanghvi (2025) INSC 485 (15 April 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Input Tax Credit on Exempted Sales to Manufacturer-Exporters: Neha Enterprises vs. Commissioner, Commercial Tax (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 9, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 476 Judges: Pankaj Mithal, J., S.V.N. Bhatti, J. Can a seller who benefits from a tax exemption on sales to manufacturer-exporters also claim input tax credit on those sales? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case concerning the interpretation

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Input Tax Credit on Exempted Sales to Manufacturer-Exporters: Neha Enterprises vs. Commissioner, Commercial Tax (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies execution of decree for possession in property disputes: Periyammal vs. Rajamani (2025) INSC 329 (6 March 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 6 March 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 329 Judges: J. B. Pardiwala, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. When a person wins a court case and obtains a decree, can they always be sure they will get what the decree promises? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a

Supreme Court clarifies execution of decree for possession in property disputes: Periyammal vs. Rajamani (2025) INSC 329 (6 March 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Ruling for Property Alienation Despite Undertaking: Lavanya C. vs. Vittal Gurudas Pai (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 5, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 325 Judges: Pankaj Mithal J., Sanjay Karol J. What happens when a party assures the court they won’t sell a property during a legal battle, but then does so anyway? The Supreme Court of India recently examined this issue in a case involving a

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Ruling for Property Alienation Despite Undertaking: Lavanya C. vs. Vittal Gurudas Pai (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the scope of bona fide need for eviction under tenancy laws: Kanhaiya Lal Arya vs. Md. Ehshan (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 25, 2025 Judges: Pankaj Mithal, J., Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. Can a landlord evict a tenant based on the ‘bona fide need’ to establish a business for unemployed sons? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Kanhaiya Lal Arya vs. Md. Ehshan & Ors.,

Supreme Court settles the scope of bona fide need for eviction under tenancy laws: Kanhaiya Lal Arya vs. Md. Ehshan (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Quashes Extradition Order: Vishal Shah vs. Monali Shah Gupta (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 20, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 254 Judges: Pankaj Mithal, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a marriage be dissolved if it has irretrievably broken down, even if one party opposes it? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Vishal Shah vs. Monali Shah Gupta,

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Quashes Extradition Order: Vishal Shah vs. Monali Shah Gupta (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in strangulation case due to lack of conclusive evidence: Ravi vs. State of Punjab (2025) INSC 170 (10 February 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 170 Judges: Pankaj Mithal, J., Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. In a case hinging on circumstantial evidence, the Supreme Court of India addressed the critical question of whether the prosecution had sufficiently proven the guilt of the accused, Ravi, beyond a reasonable doubt in the alleged

Supreme Court overturns conviction in strangulation case due to lack of conclusive evidence: Ravi vs. State of Punjab (2025) INSC 170 (10 February 2025) Read Post »

Scroll to Top