Pankaj Mithal

Supreme Court Grants Bail Despite Upholding High Court Order in Unlawful Activities Case: Akhil Gogoi vs. State (NIA) (2023)

Supreme Court Grants Bail Despite Upholding High Court Order in Unlawful Activities Case: Akhil Gogoi vs. State (NIA) (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can grant bail to an accused when it upholds the High Court’s decision to set aside a discharge order by the Special Court. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) […]

Supreme Court Grants Bail Despite Upholding High Court Order in Unlawful Activities Case: Akhil Gogoi vs. State (NIA) (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Bail Despite Upholding High Court Order in Unlawful Activities Case: Akhil Gogoi vs. National Investigation Agency (2023) INSC 392 (18 April 2023)

Supreme Court Grants Bail Despite Upholding High Court Order in Unlawful Activities Case Date of the Judgment: 18 April 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 392 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J. and Pankaj Mithal, J. Can an individual be granted bail even when the High Court has overturned a lower court’s order of discharge? The Supreme Court addressed

Supreme Court Grants Bail Despite Upholding High Court Order in Unlawful Activities Case: Akhil Gogoi vs. National Investigation Agency (2023) INSC 392 (18 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence and procedural lapse: Fedrick Cutinha vs. State of Karnataka (2023)

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence and procedural lapse: Fedrick Cutinha vs. State of Karnataka (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 18, 2023 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. Can a High Court overturn a trial court’s acquittal based on limited evidence, especially

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence and procedural lapse: Fedrick Cutinha vs. State of Karnataka (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe (2023) INSC 388

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units Date of the Judgment: April 18, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 388 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed whether supervisors in government-owned printing and minting facilities are entitled to double overtime pay under the Factories Act, 1948. This

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe (2023) INSC 388 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Double Overtime for Supervisors in Security Printing & Minting Corporation case: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe & Ors. (2023) INSC 379 (18 April 2023)

Supreme Court clarifies Double Overtime for Supervisors in Security Printing & Minting Corporation case Date of the Judgment: 18 April 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 379 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. Can supervisors in government-owned printing and minting corporations claim double overtime pay? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this complex issue, examining

Supreme Court clarifies Double Overtime for Supervisors in Security Printing & Minting Corporation case: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe & Ors. (2023) INSC 379 (18 April 2023) Read Post »

MSME Act Prevails: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Hot Mix Plant Over Panchayat Objections (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds MSME Act Over Panchayat Regulations in Hot Mix Plant Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Kerala Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Act, 2019 (Kerala MSME Act) overrides the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, regarding the requirement of licenses for establishing a Hot Mix Plant. CASE TYPE: Local Government and Business Regulation Case

MSME Act Prevails: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Hot Mix Plant Over Panchayat Objections (2023) Read Post »

MSME Act Overrides Panchayat Regulations: Supreme Court Allows Hot Mix Plant Operation (April 12, 2023)

Supreme Court Upholds MSME Act Over Panchayat Regulations in Hot Mix Plant Case Date of the Judgment: April 12, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 335 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J., and Pankaj Mithal, J. Can a local Panchayat’s regulations prevent the operation of a business that has obtained necessary clearances under a state-level act designed to promote

MSME Act Overrides Panchayat Regulations: Supreme Court Allows Hot Mix Plant Operation (April 12, 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Eyewitness Testimony: Sita Ram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) INSC 364

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Eyewitness Testimony: Sita Ram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) INSC 364 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the testimony of eyewitnesses whose statements are inconsistent and who have a prior enmity with the accused can be relied upon for conviction in a murder case, especially when independent

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Eyewitness Testimony: Sita Ram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) INSC 364 Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony: Sita Ram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023)

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony: Sita Ram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of an accused can be sustained when the eyewitness testimonies are inconsistent and unreliable, and when independent eyewitnesses are available but not examined by the prosecution. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony: Sita Ram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can modify its original order in a contempt petition. Also, whether the State can deny permission for a procession based on law and order concerns. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: K. Phanindra Reddy,

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can modify its original order in a contempt petition after disposing of the main writ petition and review applications. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: K. Phanindra Reddy, I.A.S. and Ors. vs. G. Subramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Lucknow Court in Money Laundering Case: Ka Rauf Sherif vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Lucknow Court in Money Laundering Case: Ka Rauf Sherif vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 319 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J. and Pankaj Mithal, J. Can a court in Lucknow have jurisdiction over a money laundering case when the alleged criminal activities

Supreme Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Lucknow Court in Money Laundering Case: Ka Rauf Sherif vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top