Pankaj Mithal

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Civil Judge for Misconduct: Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka vs. Sri M. Narasimha Prasad (2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 80(2), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 311, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Judicial Misconduct, Pankaj Mithal, Service Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Civil Judge for Misconduct: Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka vs. Sri M. Narasimha Prasad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a judicial officer can be dismissed for misconduct, including pronouncing judgments without the full text being ready and improper handling of auctions. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: The […]

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Civil Judge for Misconduct: Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka vs. Sri M. Narasimha Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Misconduct: Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka vs. Sri M. Narasimha Prasad (2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 80, Disciplinary Proceedings, Dismissal from Service, Judges, Judicial Misconduct, Pankaj Mithal, Service Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Misconduct: Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka vs. Sri M. Narasimha Prasad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a judicial officer can be dismissed from service for misconduct, including pronouncing judgments without the full text being prepared and irregularities in handling court auctions. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disciplinary Proceedings

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Misconduct: Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka vs. Sri M. Narasimha Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside bail in NDPS case involving commercial quantity of Ganja: Union of India vs. Ajay Kumar Singh (2023)

/ Bail Provisions, Commercial Quantity, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Judges, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 37, Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court sets aside bail in NDPS case involving commercial quantity of Ganja: Union of India vs. Ajay Kumar Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail can be granted to an accused involved in offences related to commercial quantities of narcotics under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) without adhering to the

Supreme Court sets aside bail in NDPS case involving commercial quantity of Ganja: Union of India vs. Ajay Kumar Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in NDPS Act Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Ganja: Union of India vs. Ajay Kumar Singh (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Judges, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 37, Offences involving commercial quantity, Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in NDPS Act Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail can be granted to an accused involved in commercial quantity drug trafficking without satisfying the conditions under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Case Name: Union of

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in NDPS Act Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Ganja: Union of India vs. Ajay Kumar Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case: K.H. Balakrishna vs. State of Karnataka (21 March 2023)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 342, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 366, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 506, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case: K.H. Balakrishna vs. State of Karnataka (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused was guilty of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and criminal intimidation. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: K.H. Balakrishna vs. The State of Karnataka Judgment Date: 21 March 2023 Date of the Judgment: 21 March 2023 Citation: 2023

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case: K.H. Balakrishna vs. State of Karnataka (21 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in kidnapping case: K.H. Balakrishna vs. State of Karnataka (21 March 2023)

/ Criminal Intimidation, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 342, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 366, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 506, Judges, Kidnapping, Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian, Wrongful Confinement

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case: K.H. Balakrishna vs. State of Karnataka (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused was guilty of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and criminal intimidation. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: K.H. Balakrishna vs. State of Karnataka Judgment Date: 21 March 2023 Date of the Judgment: 21 March 2023 Citation: Criminal Appeal No.

Supreme Court acquits accused in kidnapping case: K.H. Balakrishna vs. State of Karnataka (21 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Loan Fraud Case: Mahdoom Bava vs. CBI (20 March 2023)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 467, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Loan Fraud Case: Mahdoom Bava vs. CBI (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to accused persons who were not arrested during investigation but are now facing summons from the Trial Court. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mahdoom Bava vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Judgment Date: 20

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Loan Fraud Case: Mahdoom Bava vs. CBI (20 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Bank Fraud Case: Mahdoom Bava vs. CBI (20 March 2023)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 467, Judges, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Pankaj Mithal, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Bank Fraud Case: Mahdoom Bava vs. CBI (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Grant of Anticipatory Bail, especially when custodial interrogation was not required during investigation. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mahdoom Bava vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Judgment Date: 20 March 2023 Date of the Judgment: 20 March 2023 Citation: (2023)

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Bank Fraud Case: Mahdoom Bava vs. CBI (20 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Debtor’s Asset in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023)

/ Contract Law, Development Agreement, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 18, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 25, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 3(27), Judges, Leave and License Agreement, Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Debtor’s Asset in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether development rights of a Corporate Debtor over a property can be considered as its asset for the purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. CASE TYPE: Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Debtor’s Asset in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Assets in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023)

/ Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 202, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 18, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 3(27), Insolvency Resolution Process, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Assets in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether development rights of a corporate debtor over a property can be considered as an asset during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Victory Iron Works Ltd.

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Assets in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in property disputes: Future Sector Land Developers vs. Bagmane Developers (2023)

/ Civil Law, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order VII Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 16, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 20, Judges, Jurisdiction, Pankaj Mithal, Property Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Property Dispute: Future Sector Land Developers vs. Bagmane Developers (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct jurisdiction for suits involving immovable property when contractual rights are also involved. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Property Dispute, Jurisdiction Case Name: Future Sector Land Developers LLP & Anr. vs. Bagmane Developers P. Ltd. & Ors.

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in property disputes: Future Sector Land Developers vs. Bagmane Developers (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, B.R. Gavai, Bela M. Trivedi, Compassionate Appointment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 18(3), Labour Law with Section 2(p), M.R. Shah, Pankaj Mithal, R. Banumathi, Sandeep Mehta, Service Law, T.S. Thakur

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi When a person dies while in service, can their dependent automatically get a job? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top