Pinaki Chandra Ghose

Supreme Court quashes TADA convictions due to invalid sanctions: Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State (27 April 2017)

Can a conviction under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) stand if the mandatory prior approvals were not properly obtained? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State. The court overturned the convictions, emphasizing the importance of strict adherence to legal procedures. This […]

Supreme Court quashes TADA convictions due to invalid sanctions: Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State (27 April 2017) Read Post »

Babri Masjid Demolition Case: Supreme Court Orders Joint Trial (19 April 2017)

The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical issue regarding the demolition of the Babri Masjid. The Court has ordered a joint trial for all accused. This decision aims to consolidate proceedings and ensure a comprehensive resolution. This judgment was delivered by a two-judge bench comprising Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Justice R.F. Nariman. Justice

Babri Masjid Demolition Case: Supreme Court Orders Joint Trial (19 April 2017) Read Post »

Babri Masjid Demolition Case: Supreme Court Orders Joint Trial and Overturns Discharge of Accused (19 April 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 19 April 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 398 Judges: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J., R.F. Nariman, J. Can a fractured prosecution derail the course of justice? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the Babri Masjid demolition case, ordering a joint trial of all accused individuals. The core issue was whether

Babri Masjid Demolition Case: Supreme Court Orders Joint Trial and Overturns Discharge of Accused (19 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Arbitration Cases: Indus Mobile vs. Datawind (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the jurisdiction of courts in arbitration matters when the seat of arbitration is specified. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Indus Mobile Distribution Private Limited vs. Datawind Innovations Private Limited & Ors. Judgment Date: April 19, 2017 Can a court other than the one at the ‘seat’ of arbitration have jurisdiction over

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Arbitration Cases: Indus Mobile vs. Datawind (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Disciplinary Inquiry Rules for Minor Penalties: D.H.B.V.N.L. vs. Yashvir Singh Gulia (30 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 30 July 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 536 Judges: K. S. Radhakrishnan, J. and Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Can a disciplinary authority impose a minor penalty after issuing a charge-sheet for a major penalty, without conducting a full departmental inquiry? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning

Supreme Court Clarifies Disciplinary Inquiry Rules for Minor Penalties: D.H.B.V.N.L. vs. Yashvir Singh Gulia (30 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Partial Refund for Uncompleted PhD Study Leave: Sant Longowal Institute vs. Suresh Chandra Verma (2013)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an educational institute can demand a full refund of salary and allowances from an employee who failed to complete their PhD during a study leave. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering & Technology & Anr. vs. Suresh Chandra Verma Judgment Date: 18 July 2013 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Partial Refund for Uncompleted PhD Study Leave: Sant Longowal Institute vs. Suresh Chandra Verma (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Decides Juvenile Status Under the JJ Act: Ketankumar Gopalbhai Tandel vs. State of Gujarat (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 18, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 521 Judges: K.S. Radhakrishnan, J., Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Can a person who was not considered a juvenile under the old law, be considered a juvenile under the new law? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case where the accused was a few

Supreme Court Decides Juvenile Status Under the JJ Act: Ketankumar Gopalbhai Tandel vs. State of Gujarat (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies retrenchment definition in contractual employment: Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation vs. Salimbhai Umarbhai Mansuri (2013)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether termination of service on expiry of a fixed-term contract constitutes retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation vs. Salimbhai Umarbhai Mansuri Judgment Date: 16 July 2013 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 16 July 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 507 Judges: K.S. Radhakrishnan, J., Pinaki

Supreme Court clarifies retrenchment definition in contractual employment: Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation vs. Salimbhai Umarbhai Mansuri (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds US Court Order in Child Custody Case: Arathi Bandi vs. Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 16, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 473 Judges: Surinder Singh Nijjar, J., Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Can a parent who takes a child out of their home country against court orders be compelled to return the child? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical issue in a recent case involving

Supreme Court Upholds US Court Order in Child Custody Case: Arathi Bandi vs. Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top