PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bank fraud case, emphasizing the need for conclusive evidence: Hiralal Babulal Soni vs. State of Maharashtra (25 February 2025)

/ B.R. Gavai, Evidence Act, Evidence Act with Section 106, Evidence Act with Section 114, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411, Judges, K.V. Viswanathan, Offences Against Property, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 266 Judges: B.R. Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra, K.V. Viswanathan The Supreme Court of India recently addressed a case involving a large-scale fraud committed through fake Telegraphic Transfers (TTs) at a Vijaya Bank branch in Maharashtra. The central question was whether the accused, Nandkumar Babulal Soni, […]

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bank fraud case, emphasizing the need for conclusive evidence: Hiralal Babulal Soni vs. State of Maharashtra (25 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Ticket Forgery Case: Surinder Dogra vs. State (2025)

/ Judges, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 5, Ranbir Penal Code, 1989, Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 with Section 420, Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 with Section 468, Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 with Section 471, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Date of the Judgment: February 21, 2025 Judges: Prashant Kumar Mishra, J., Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Can an airline employee be convicted for forging flight tickets and causing financial loss to the company? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving an employee of Indian Airlines who was accused of tampering

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Ticket Forgery Case: Surinder Dogra vs. State (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows registration of second FIR in corruption case: State of Rajasthan vs. Surendra Singh Rathore (2025) INSC 248 (19 February 2025)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Procedure Code with Section 173, Criminal Procedure Code with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Judges, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, Prevention of Corruption Act, Prevention of Corruption Act with Section 7, Prevention of Corruption Act with Section 7A, Sanjay Karol

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19th February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 248 Judges: Sanjay Karol, J. and Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Can police register a second FIR for the same offense? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a case involving allegations of corruption against a government official in Rajasthan. The

Supreme Court allows registration of second FIR in corruption case: State of Rajasthan vs. Surendra Singh Rathore (2025) INSC 248 (19 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Accident Case Involving Foreign Income: Shyam Prasad Nagalla vs. APSRTC (2025)

/ Calculation of Compensation, Compensation, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Exchange Rate, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Multiplier, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, Sanjay Karol, Supreme Court Judgments

Date of the Judgment: February 11, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 193 Judges: Sanjay Karol, J., Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. When an accident occurs involving a victim earning in a foreign currency, how should compensation be calculated? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, focusing on the exchange rate and the

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Accident Case Involving Foreign Income: Shyam Prasad Nagalla vs. APSRTC (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies dependency for compensation in motor accident claims: Seema Rani vs. Oriental Insurance (2025)

/ Judges, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, Sanjay Karol

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 11, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 192 Judges: Sanjay Karol, J., Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Can major sons and married daughters be considered dependents for compensation in motor accident claims? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in an appeal concerning a motor accident claim. The court clarified

Supreme Court clarifies dependency for compensation in motor accident claims: Seema Rani vs. Oriental Insurance (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies compassionate appointment criteria: Canara Bank vs. Ajithkumar G.K. (2025) INSC 184

/ Compassionate Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dipankar Datta, Judges, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, Service Law

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 11th February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 184 Judges: Dipankar Datta, J., Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. When a family loses its primary breadwinner, can the surviving members expect immediate financial assistance from the deceased’s employer? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in the case of Canara Bank

Supreme Court clarifies compassionate appointment criteria: Canara Bank vs. Ajithkumar G.K. (2025) INSC 184 Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Nur Ahamad Abdulsab Kana Vi vs. Abdul Munaf & Ors. (2025)

/ Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, Sanjay Karol

Date of the Judgment: February 11, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 191 Judges: Sanjay Karol, J., Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. How should a court determine the income of a claimant in a motor accident case, especially when the claimant has suffered significant disability? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Nur

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Nur Ahamad Abdulsab Kana Vi vs. Abdul Munaf & Ors. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances compensation in motor accident case, emphasizing functional disability: Sanjay Rajpoot vs. Ram Singh & Ors. (2025)

/ Assessment of Disability, Assessment of Monthly Income, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 279, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Offences Affecting the Human Body, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, Sanjay Karol

Date of the Judgment: February 11, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 188 Judges: Sanjay Karol, J. and Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. How should courts determine compensation in motor accident cases, especially when the injured party suffers a significant disability? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Sanjay Rajpoot vs. Ram

Supreme Court enhances compensation in motor accident case, emphasizing functional disability: Sanjay Rajpoot vs. Ram Singh & Ors. (2025) Read Post »

Property Law: Supreme Court Revives Stalled Property Dispute, Addresses Abatement in Second Appeals: Om Prakash Gupta vs. Satish Chandra (2025)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XXII, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XXII Rule 10-A, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Dipankar Datta, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

Date of the Judgment: 11th February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 183 Judges: Dipankar Datta, J., Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Can a decades-old property dispute be revived after long delays and the deaths of original parties? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case concerning the specific performance of contracts for sale,

Property Law: Supreme Court Revives Stalled Property Dispute, Addresses Abatement in Second Appeals: Om Prakash Gupta vs. Satish Chandra (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim: Jitendra vs. Sadiya & Ors. (2025)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 279, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 337, Judges, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Offences Affecting the Human Body, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, Sanjay Karol

Date of the Judgment: February 7, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 166 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra When a young labourer’s hand was tragically amputated in a thresher machine accident, the quest for fair compensation led to a protracted legal battle. The Supreme Court of India stepped in to address the critical

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim: Jitendra vs. Sadiya & Ors. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence (2025) INSC 116

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 65B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, K.V. Viswanathan, Offences Against Human Body, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

Date of the Judgment: 28 January 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 116 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., Prashant Kumar Mishra, J., K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can a conviction for murder be upheld based on circumstantial evidence alone? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a case involving a gruesome murder, ultimately acquitting the accused

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence (2025) INSC 116 Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Charges in Employee Harassment Case: Madhushree Datta vs. State of Karnataka (2025)

/ Dipankar Datta, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 504, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the allegations made against the appellants constitute offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 509, and 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Madhushree Datta vs. The State of Karnataka & Anr. Judgment Date: 24 January 2025 Date of the Judgment: 24 January 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 105

Supreme Court Quashes Charges in Employee Harassment Case: Madhushree Datta vs. State of Karnataka (2025) Read Post »

Scroll to Top