R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Vikram Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a death penalty in a criminal case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Vikram Singh @ Vicky Walia and Anr. vs. State of Punjab and Anr. Judgment Date: July 7, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 7, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 635 Judges: Dipak Misra, J., R. Banumathi, J., Ashok Bhushan, […]

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Vikram Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Arbitration Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Navnirman Development Consultants vs. Divisional Commissioner (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in dismissing an arbitration appeal without proper consideration of facts and legal grounds. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: The Navnirman Development Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Divisional Commissioner & President District Sports Complex Executive Committee [Judgment Date]: July 05, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 05,

Supreme Court Remands Arbitration Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Navnirman Development Consultants vs. Divisional Commissioner (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Gift Deed and Eviction: D.N. Joshi vs. D.C. Harris (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a gift deed under Muslim Law and its effect on property ownership. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Law, Eviction) Case Name: D. N. Joshi (D) Thr. LRs. & Others vs. D.C. Harris & Another [Judgment Date]: July 3, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: July 3, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 588 Judges:

Supreme Court Upholds Gift Deed and Eviction: D.N. Joshi vs. D.C. Harris (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court ensures equal financial benefits for senior employee in service matter: State of Bihar vs. Suryadeo Prasad Tewary (2017)

Can a senior employee be denied financial benefits that have been granted to a junior employee? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a recent service matter case. The Court emphasized fairness and equality, ensuring that a senior employee receives the same financial benefits as a junior. This judgment highlights the importance of

Supreme Court ensures equal financial benefits for senior employee in service matter: State of Bihar vs. Suryadeo Prasad Tewary (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles ACP Scheme applicability for retained employees in Haryana State Small Industries Case (24 April 2017)

Can employees, retained by court order, be considered surplus and denied benefits under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving the Haryana State Small Industries and Export Corporation Limited. This judgment clarifies the position of employees retained due to court orders, ensuring they

Supreme Court settles ACP Scheme applicability for retained employees in Haryana State Small Industries Case (24 April 2017) Read Post »

Land Acquisition Deadline: Supreme Court rules against DDA in Krishna Rajauria Case (24 April 2017)

Can a government body avoid paying compensation for acquired land by claiming a stay order when that stay didn’t apply to the specific land owners? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a case involving the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and several landowners. The court clarified the application of Section 24(2) of The

Land Acquisition Deadline: Supreme Court rules against DDA in Krishna Rajauria Case (24 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute After Settlement: Rajeev Kumar Upadhyay vs. Prakash Chand Rawat (2017)

Date of the Judgment: April 24, 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 380 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and R. Banumathi, J. Can a pending appeal be dismissed if the parties reach a settlement? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case where the parties resolved their property dispute out of court. This judgment

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute After Settlement: Rajeev Kumar Upadhyay vs. Prakash Chand Rawat (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles land acquisition lapses: No Possession, No Compensation, Acquisition Lapses (20 April 2017)

Can the government acquire land without taking possession or paying compensation? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a series of land acquisition cases. The Court emphasized that if the government fails to take possession of the land or pay compensation within five years, the acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of

Supreme Court settles land acquisition lapses: No Possession, No Compensation, Acquisition Lapses (20 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Rent Default and Subletting: Anil Kumar Dhekale vs. Rukhiben (2017)

Can a tenant be evicted for not paying rent and subletting the property? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a landlord seeking to evict his tenants. The core issue revolved around whether the tenants had defaulted on rent payments and illegally sublet the property. This case, Anil Kumar Dadhurao

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Rent Default and Subletting: Anil Kumar Dhekale vs. Rukhiben (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules on Landlord’s Bona Fide Need and its applicability to Legal Heirs in Property Eviction Cases (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the bona fide requirement of a landlord for eviction of a tenant extends to the legal heirs upon the landlord’s death, especially when the family business continues. CASE TYPE: Property Eviction Law. Case Name: Satish Chander Aggarwal (D) By Lrs. vs. Shyam Lal Om Prakash, Arhti and Anr Judgment Date: March 30,

Supreme Court rules on Landlord’s Bona Fide Need and its applicability to Legal Heirs in Property Eviction Cases (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court mandates interest on rent arrears: Bhagirath Agarwal vs. M/S Simplex Concrete & Piles (I) Pvt. Ltd. (23 March 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court has the discretion to deny interest on arrears of rent when permitting payment in installments under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. CASE TYPE: Tenancy Law Case Name: Bhagirath Agarwal vs. M/S Simplex Concrete & Piles (I) Pvt. Ltd. [Judgment Date]: 23 March 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court mandates interest on rent arrears: Bhagirath Agarwal vs. M/S Simplex Concrete & Piles (I) Pvt. Ltd. (23 March 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Defense Procurement Policy for Submarine Batteries: Union of India vs. HBL Nife Power Systems Ltd. (20 January 2016)

Can the government be compelled to issue open tenders for specialized defense equipment like submarine batteries? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case involving the procurement process for the Indian Navy. The court’s decision clarifies the importance of adhering to established defense procurement policies, especially for critical and specialized equipment.

Supreme Court Upholds Defense Procurement Policy for Submarine Batteries: Union of India vs. HBL Nife Power Systems Ltd. (20 January 2016) Read Post »

Scroll to Top