R. Banumathi

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Special Education Teachers in Delhi: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Pradeep Kumar (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET), Eligibility Criteria, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Banumathi, Recruitment Rules, Relaxation in Qualifying Marks, Reservation Policy, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Special Education Teachers in Delhi: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Pradeep Kumar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates who obtained the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) qualification with relaxed pass marks for the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category from states other than Delhi, can be considered for employment as Special Education […]

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Special Education Teachers in Delhi: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Pradeep Kumar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows CENVAT Credit Counterclaim in Arbitration: Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. vs. Go Airlines (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 16, Arbitrator Jurisdiction, Contract Law, Hrishikesh Roy, Implied Terms, Judges, R. Banumathi, Scope of Arbitration Agreement

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit Counterclaim in Arbitration: Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. vs. Go Airlines (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator has the jurisdiction to consider a counterclaim relating to CENVAT (Central Value Added Tax) credit in an arbitration proceeding. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited vs. Go Airlines (India) Limited [Judgment

Supreme Court allows CENVAT Credit Counterclaim in Arbitration: Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. vs. Go Airlines (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Bail in INX Media Case: P. Chidambaram vs. CBI (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 438, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 468, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 8, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Grants Bail in INX Media Case: P. Chidambaram vs. CBI (2019) Date of the Judgment: October 22, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1103 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., A.S. Bopanna, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a court deny bail based on a mere apprehension that a person might influence witnesses, even when there’s no concrete

Supreme Court Grants Bail in INX Media Case: P. Chidambaram vs. CBI (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court’s decision on Foreign Contribution case: Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Arvind Khanna (2019)

/ Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976, Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, Judges, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court quashes High Court order in Foreign Contribution case: CBI vs. Arvind Khanna (2019) Date of the Judgment: 17 October 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1174 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and R. Subhash Reddy, J. Can a High Court quash a criminal case based on disputed facts before a trial? The Supreme Court addressed this

Supreme Court overturns High Court’s decision on Foreign Contribution case: Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Arvind Khanna (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes High Court order in cheating case: Dr. Lakshman vs. State of Karnataka (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges, Offences Relating to Property, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court quashes High Court order in cheating case: Dr. Lakshman vs. State of Karnataka (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal complaint for cheating can be quashed when a civil suit for recovery of money and a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are also filed. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Dr.

Supreme Court quashes High Court order in cheating case: Dr. Lakshman vs. State of Karnataka (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Review of Contract Labour Prohibition in ONGC: ONGC Labour Union vs. ONGC Dehradun (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 with Section 10, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Prohibition of Contract Labour, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Review of Contract Labour Prohibition in ONGC: ONGC Labour Union vs. ONGC Dehradun (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prohibition of contract labor in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) establishments was validly issued under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Review of Contract Labour Prohibition in ONGC: ONGC Labour Union vs. ONGC Dehradun (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “commercial dispute” under Commercial Courts Act: Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. vs. K.S. Infraspace LLP (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Order VII Rule 10, Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 2(1)(c)(vii), Commercial Dispute, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court clarifies “commercial dispute” under Commercial Courts Act: Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. vs. K.S. Infraspace LLP (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “commercial dispute” concerning immovable property under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. CASE TYPE: Civil, Commercial Dispute Case Name: Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. vs. K.S. Infraspace LLP & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 4 October 2019

Supreme Court clarifies “commercial dispute” under Commercial Courts Act: Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. vs. K.S. Infraspace LLP (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for allotment and development charges in Okhla Enclave Plot Dispute: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association vs. Union of India and Others (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration, Arbitration Process, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 with Section 3, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 with Section 5, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 with Section 8(4), Judges, R. Banumathi, Special Committee, Vikramajit Sen

Supreme Court Clarifies Allotment and Development Charges in Okhla Enclave Dispute (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the process of allotment of plots, payment of development charges, and the role of the colonizer in a long-standing real estate dispute. CASE TYPE: Real Estate/Land Allotment Dispute Case Name: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association vs. Union of

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for allotment and development charges in Okhla Enclave Plot Dispute: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association vs. Union of India and Others (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act in Arbitration Cases: Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s Tejparas Associates & Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 33, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Order 7 Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code with Order 7 Rule 10A, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act in Arbitration Cases: Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s Tejparas Associates & Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the time spent in a court lacking jurisdiction can be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act when re-presenting a petition in the

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act in Arbitration Cases: Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s Tejparas Associates & Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Hearing in Rent Dispute: Krishna Devi Maheshwari vs. Surendra Surekha (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Eviction of Tenant, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Banumathi, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 21(1)(a)

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Hearing in Rent Dispute: Krishna Devi Maheshwari vs. Surendra Surekha (2019) Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1129 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., A.S. Bopanna, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a tenant’s repeated adjournments delay a landlord’s right to reclaim their property? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Hearing in Rent Dispute: Krishna Devi Maheshwari vs. Surendra Surekha (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Scheme Cut-Off Date but Grants Relief in Exceptional Case: Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. Janak Raj Sharma (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Administrative Law, Bank Employees, Employee Rights, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Pension Law, Pension Law with Cut-off Dates, Pension Schemes, R. Banumathi, Retirement Benefits, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Scheme Cut-Off Date but Grants Relief in Exceptional Case: Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. Janak Raj Sharma (2019) Date of the Judgment: 01 October 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1189 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., A.S. Bopanna, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a bank employee who missed the deadline to opt for a

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Scheme Cut-Off Date but Grants Relief in Exceptional Case: Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. Janak Raj Sharma (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, R. Banumathi, Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994, Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 with Section 3(1), Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 with Section 4, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993 with Rule 15, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993 with Rule 6

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a revised requisition of vacancies by the government, after the initial advertisement, is valid if it aims to correct a miscalculation and comply with reservation policies. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Anupal Singh and

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top