LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Arbitral Tribunal’s interim orders are enforceable and whether contempt of such orders falls under the ambit of Section 27(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Alka Chandewar vs. Shamshul Ishrar Khan. Judgment Date: July 6, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: July 6, 2017 […]
The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical issue regarding the demolition of the Babri Masjid. The Court has ordered a joint trial for all accused. This decision aims to consolidate proceedings and ensure a comprehensive resolution. This judgment was delivered by a two-judge bench comprising Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Justice R.F. Nariman. Justice
Babri Masjid Demolition Case: Supreme Court Orders Joint Trial (19 April 2017) Read Post »
Date of the Judgment: 19 April 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 398 Judges: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J., R.F. Nariman, J. Can a fractured prosecution derail the course of justice? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the Babri Masjid demolition case, ordering a joint trial of all accused individuals. The core issue was whether
LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the jurisdiction of courts in arbitration matters when the seat of arbitration is specified. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Indus Mobile Distribution Private Limited vs. Datawind Innovations Private Limited & Ors. Judgment Date: April 19, 2017 Can a court other than the one at the ‘seat’ of arbitration have jurisdiction over
Date of the Judgment: 15 November 2016 Citation: (2016) INSC 1093 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R.F. Nariman, J. Can a defendant in a summary suit be granted unconditional leave to defend if they raise a triable issue? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a corporate guarantee. The Court clarified
