R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022)

/ Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 35-A, Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 441(2), Companies Act, 1956 with Section 531, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45-JA, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45-MB

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) directives regarding the transfer of bonds are binding on financial institutions. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Banking Law. Case Name: Small Industries Development Bank of India vs. M/s. Sibco Investment Pvt. Ltd. Judgment […]

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces sentence in culpable homicide case arising from property dispute: Govindan vs. State (2021)

/ Culpable Homicide, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Culpable Homicide Case: Govindan vs. State (2021) Date of the Judgment: December 17, 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 735 Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a sentence for culpable homicide be reduced when the act occurred during a sudden quarrel and in the exercise of the right to

Supreme Court reduces sentence in culpable homicide case arising from property dispute: Govindan vs. State (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes order passed by MSME Council for not following Arbitration Act: Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan (2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, Dispute Resolution, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, MSMED Act with Section 18, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court quashes order passed by MSME Council for not following Arbitration Act: Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) can pass an order for payment without initiating proper arbitration proceedings as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court quashes order passed by MSME Council for not following Arbitration Act: Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition in land acquisition case: Soorajmull Nagarmull vs. Brijesh Mehrotra (2021)

/ Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 11, Land Acquisition Law with Section 64, R. Subhash Reddy, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition in land acquisition case: Soorajmull Nagarmull vs. Brijesh Mehrotra (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the respondents wilfully violated the Supreme Court’s directions regarding land acquisition compensation. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court / Land Acquisition Case Name: M/s. Soorajmull Nagarmull vs. Sri Brijesh Mehrotra & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 14 December 2021 Introduction

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition in land acquisition case: Soorajmull Nagarmull vs. Brijesh Mehrotra (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Market Fee on Processed Goods from Outside State: APMC Yashwanthapura vs. Selva Foods (2021)

/ Agricultural Marketing Law, Agricultural Marketing Law with Section 65, Judges, Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act of 1966, Market Fees, R. Subhash Reddy, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Market Fee on Processed Goods from Outside State: APMC Yashwanthapura vs. Selva Foods (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether market fees are applicable to processed agricultural goods that were imported from outside the state and sold within the market area. CASE TYPE: Agricultural Marketing Law Case Name: APMC Yashwanthapura vs. M/s. Selva Foods Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Market Fee on Processed Goods from Outside State: APMC Yashwanthapura vs. Selva Foods (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court Order on Temporary Status for Casual Laborers: BSNL vs. Deo Kumar Rai (2021)

/ Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 22(3), Casual Labourers, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Regularization, Service Law, Temporary Status

Supreme Court Overturns High Court Order on Temporary Status for Casual Laborers: BSNL vs. Deo Kumar Rai (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a casual laborer is entitled to temporary status under the Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme of the Department of Telecommunications, 1989, if they have not worked for 240 days in

Supreme Court Overturns High Court Order on Temporary Status for Casual Laborers: BSNL vs. Deo Kumar Rai (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes dowry harassment charges against in-laws due to lack of specific evidence: Mirza Iqbal vs. State of UP (2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 3, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 4, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court quashes dowry harassment charges against in-laws due to lack of specific evidence: Mirza Iqbal vs. State of UP (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether charges of dowry harassment and murder can be sustained against in-laws based on vague and omnibus allegations without specific evidence of their involvement. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Dowry Harassment Case Name:

Supreme Court quashes dowry harassment charges against in-laws due to lack of specific evidence: Mirza Iqbal vs. State of UP (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Cancellation of Sale Deed: Amudhavali vs. P. Rukumani (2021)

/ Cancellation Deeds, Civil Law, Civil Suit, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Property Law, R. Subhash Reddy, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with provisions concerning registration of documents, Registration of Deeds

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Cancellation of Sale Deed: Amudhavali vs. P. Rukumani (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a registered sale deed can be unilaterally cancelled by the seller. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Amudhavali & Ors. vs. P. Rukumani & Ors. Judgment Date: 7 December 2021 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Cancellation of Sale Deed: Amudhavali vs. P. Rukumani (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Custodial Escape Case: Parveen @ Sonu vs. State of Haryana (2021)

/ Arms Act, Arms Act with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Custodial Escape Case: Parveen @ Sonu vs. State of Haryana (2021) Date of the Judgment: December 7, 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 744 Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a person be convicted of conspiracy based solely on the confessional statements of co-accused, without any other corroborating evidence?

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Custodial Escape Case: Parveen @ Sonu vs. State of Haryana (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Railway Protection Force Case: Union of India vs. Ram Bahadur Yadav (26 November 2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Disciplinary Proceedings, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Natural Justice, R. Subhash Reddy, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, Rule 161, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Railway Protection Force Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether disciplinary proceedings can be initiated without a formal inquiry under Rule 161 of the Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Ram Bahadur Yadav Judgment Date: 26 November 2021 Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Railway Protection Force Case: Union of India vs. Ram Bahadur Yadav (26 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Construction Based on Legitimate Expectation: Sai Baba Sales vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation, Environmental Clearance, Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Law, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 22, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Upholds Construction Based on Legitimate Expectation: Sai Baba Sales vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Environmental Clearance (EC) granted by a local authority, later deemed invalid, can protect construction already completed. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, specifically concerning Environmental Impact Assessment. Case Name: M/s. Sai Baba Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union

Supreme Court Upholds Construction Based on Legitimate Expectation: Sai Baba Sales vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Surplus Land Under ULC Act: State of M.P. vs. Ghisilal (2021)

/ Civil Court Jurisdiction, Civil Law, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Land Acquisition, R. Subhash Reddy, Surplus Land, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 with Section 10

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Surplus Land Under ULC Act: State of M.P. vs. Ghisilal (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court can entertain a suit challenging orders passed under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, after the competent authority has declared land as surplus and taken possession. CASE TYPE: Civil Law

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Surplus Land Under ULC Act: State of M.P. vs. Ghisilal (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top