R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Orders Pension Benefits for Widow Under Coal Mines Pension Scheme (2021)

/ Coal Mines Pension Scheme, 1998, Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948, Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 with Section 3-E, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Pension Law, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Orders Pension Benefits for Widow Under Coal Mines Pension Scheme LEGAL ISSUE: Entitlement to pension benefits under the Coal Mines Pension Scheme, 1998, specifically the lump sum payment upon the death of a pensioner who had opted for reduced pension during his lifetime. CASE TYPE: Pension Law. Case Name: Veena Pandey vs. Union […]

Supreme Court Orders Pension Benefits for Widow Under Coal Mines Pension Scheme (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Re-adjudication of Stone Crusher Pollution Case: Tejinder Kumar Jolly vs. State of Uttarakhand (2021)

/ Environmental Law, Environmental Law with The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Environmental Law with The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Pollution Control, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Orders Re-adjudication of Stone Crusher Pollution Case: Tejinder Kumar Jolly vs. State of Uttarakhand (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) was correct in not adjudicating a case regarding the operation of stone crushers causing pollution. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law. Case Name: Tejinder Kumar Jolly & Anr. vs. The State of

Supreme Court Orders Re-adjudication of Stone Crusher Pollution Case: Tejinder Kumar Jolly vs. State of Uttarakhand (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Involving Child: Kurvan Ansari vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu (2021)

/ Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 163-A, R. Subhash Reddy, Schedule II, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Involving Child: Kurvan Ansari vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of just compensation in motor accident claims for non-earning members under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, particularly concerning the notional income of deceased children. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation. Case Name: Kurvan

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Involving Child: Kurvan Ansari vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: No Fraud in Hydrology Data Non-Disclosure in Malana Power Company Ltd. vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2021) INSC 720 (15 November 2021)

/ Consumer Law, Contract Law, Hrishikesh Roy, Insurance Contract, Insurance Law, Judges, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Non-Disclosure, R. Subhash Reddy, Reinsurance, Special Contingency Policy

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: No Fraud in Hydrology Data Non-Disclosure Date of the Judgment: 15 November 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 720 Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J. and Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can an insurance company deny a claim by alleging fraud and non-disclosure of data when the insured party has provided all available information? The

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: No Fraud in Hydrology Data Non-Disclosure in Malana Power Company Ltd. vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2021) INSC 720 (15 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility criteria for Anganwadi Sevika post: Rekha Bharati vs. State of Bihar (2021)

/ Appointment, Eligibility Criteria, Government Guidelines, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Anganwadi Sevika Post: Rekha Bharati vs. State of Bihar (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a married daughter of a government servant is ineligible for the post of Anganwadi Sevika as per the guidelines issued by the State Government. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Kumari Rekha Bharati vs. The State of

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility criteria for Anganwadi Sevika post: Rekha Bharati vs. State of Bihar (2021) Read Post »

Vicarious Liability under Minimum Wages Act: Supreme Court quashes proceedings against Company Director (29 October 2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Judges, Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Minimum Wages Act, 1948 with Section 22A, Minimum Wages Act, 1948 with Section 22C, Offences by Companies, R. Subhash Reddy, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court quashes proceedings against Director for Minimum Wages Act violation Date of the Judgment: 29 October 2021 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. of 2021 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 3913 of 2020) Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J. (authored the judgment) Can a company director be held liable for violations

Vicarious Liability under Minimum Wages Act: Supreme Court quashes proceedings against Company Director (29 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants last chance to Senior Advocate after gown withdrawal: Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat (28 October 2021)

/ Advocates Act, 1961, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Professional Conduct, R. Subhash Reddy, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate Designation

Supreme Court grants last chance to Senior Advocate after gown withdrawal: Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can withdraw the designation of a Senior Advocate for misconduct. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Professional Misconduct Case Name: Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat Judgment Date: 28

Supreme Court grants last chance to Senior Advocate after gown withdrawal: Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat (28 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Severely Disabled Accident Victim: Jithendran vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (27 October 2021)

/ Compensation for Disability, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Loss of Earning Capacity, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Severely Disabled Accident Victim: Jithendran vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of ‘just’ compensation in motor accident claims, particularly for victims with severe permanent disabilities. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation. Case Name: Jithendran vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. Judgment Date: 27 October

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Severely Disabled Accident Victim: Jithendran vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (27 October 2021) Read Post »

DNA Test Not Mandatory: Supreme Court Protects Right to Privacy in Property Dispute: Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Fundamental Rights, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 112, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Right to Privacy

Supreme Court on DNA Test in Property Disputes: Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party in a property dispute can be compelled to undergo a DNA test against their will to prove lineage. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Dispute) Case Name: Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 1 October

DNA Test Not Mandatory: Supreme Court Protects Right to Privacy in Property Dispute: Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation in Road Accident Case: National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Chamundeswari & Ors. (2021)

/ Compensation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Negligence, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation in Road Accident Case: National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Chamundeswari & Ors. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of negligence and compensation in a motor vehicle accident claim. CASE TYPE: Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation Case Name: National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Chamundeswari & Ors. Judgment Date: 01 October 2021 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation in Road Accident Case: National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Chamundeswari & Ors. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Parents in Motor Accident Case: Chandra @ Chanda @ Chandraram & Anr. vs. Mukesh Kumar Yadav & Ors. (2021)

/ Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Parents in Motor Accident Case (2021) Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 6152 of 2021 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No. 6466 of 2019) Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can parents who have lost their adult son in a motor vehicle accident claim

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Parents in Motor Accident Case: Chandra @ Chanda @ Chandraram & Anr. vs. Mukesh Kumar Yadav & Ors. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Retrospective Seniority in Compassionate Appointment Case: State of Bihar vs. Arbind Jee (2021)

/ Compassionate Appointment, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Seniority, Service Law, Service Law with Retrospective Seniority

Supreme Court Denies Retrospective Seniority in Compassionate Appointment Case: State of Bihar vs. Arbind Jee (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee appointed on compassionate grounds is entitled to claim seniority from a retrospective date when they were not in service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of Bihar & Ors. vs. Arbind Jee

Supreme Court Denies Retrospective Seniority in Compassionate Appointment Case: State of Bihar vs. Arbind Jee (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top