R. V. Raveendran

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence under Section 324 IPC in hurt case: Manoj & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (25 September 2008)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 320, Compounding of Offences, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 324, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Offences Affecting the Human Body, R. V. Raveendran

Date of the Judgment: 25 September 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source Text] Judges: Justice R. V. Raveendran, Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can villagers resolve disputes, even those involving physical harm, through mutual agreement? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case where two brothers were convicted of causing hurt with dangerous weapons. The […]

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence under Section 324 IPC in hurt case: Manoj & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (25 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds DDA’s Plot Allotment Policy in Land Acquisition Case (2008)

/ Delhi Development Authority (Disposal of Developed Nazul Land) Rules, 1981, Delhi Development Authority (Disposal of Developed Nazul Land) Rules, 1981 with Rule 6, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R. V. Raveendran

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5249 of 2002 Judges: Justice R. V. Raveendran and Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta When land is acquired for city development, are authorities obligated to provide plots of a specific size to those displaced? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a

Supreme Court Upholds DDA’s Plot Allotment Policy in Land Acquisition Case (2008) Read Post »

Appointment of Principal in Aided Schools: Supreme Court clarifies the role of seniority and recognition in Gwalior Mahila Mandal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2008)

/ Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmachariyon Ki Bharti) Niyam, 1979, Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Anudan Ka Pradaya) Adhiniyam, 1978, Madhya Pradesh Law, R. V. Raveendran

Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of appointing a principal in an aided school, specifically focusing on the roles of seniority and recognition of teachers. The case arose from a dispute over the appointment of a principal at Mahila Mandal Higher Secondary School in Danaoli. The

Appointment of Principal in Aided Schools: Supreme Court clarifies the role of seniority and recognition in Gwalior Mahila Mandal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2008) Read Post »

Regularization of Daily Wage Workers: Supreme Court clarifies applicability of State Government policies in Haryana Rajya Sainik Board vs. Mohan Lal (2008)

/ Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-F, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R. V. Raveendran, Societies Registration Act, 1860

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Judges: Justice R. V. Raveendran and Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a social welfare organization be compelled to regularize a daily wage employee based on State Government policies? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Haryana Rajya Sainik Board-cum-Defence & Security Relief Fund & Member

Regularization of Daily Wage Workers: Supreme Court clarifies applicability of State Government policies in Haryana Rajya Sainik Board vs. Mohan Lal (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces life sentence to 10 years in culpable homicide case: Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil vs. State of Maharashtra (2008)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R. V. Raveendran

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Judges: R. V. Raveendran, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When does a single blow resulting in death constitute murder versus culpable homicide? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil v. State of Maharashtra. The court examined

Supreme Court reduces life sentence to 10 years in culpable homicide case: Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil vs. State of Maharashtra (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail in defamation case: Jonathan Nitin Brady vs. State of West Bengal (2008)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 153A, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R. V. Raveendran

Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Judges: R. V. Raveendran, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Can a radio jockey be arrested for comments made during a show? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Jonathan Nitin Brady vs. State of West Bengal, where an FIR was filed against a radio jockey

Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail in defamation case: Jonathan Nitin Brady vs. State of West Bengal (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants bail in forgery case involving forged vehicle registration: Anwar Ali vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2008)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 467, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 471, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R. V. Raveendran

Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Judges: R. V. Raveendran, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a person accused of using forged documents to obtain a vehicle registration certificate be granted bail if a co-accused with similar evidence has already been granted bail? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case involving allegations of forgery

Supreme Court grants bail in forgery case involving forged vehicle registration: Anwar Ali vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top