Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Substitution as Secured Creditor: Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Official Liquidator (2018)

/ Actionable Claim, Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 with Rule 9, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Navin Sinha, Ranjan Gogoi, Secured Creditor, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 130

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Substitution as Secured Creditor: Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Official Liquidator (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an assignee of debt can be substituted as a secured creditor under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) if it is not a […]

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Substitution as Secured Creditor: Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Official Liquidator (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Parricide Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Navin Sinha, Offences Against Human Body, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Parricide Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence Date of the Judgment: October 01, 2018 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 114 of 2012 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J., Navin Sinha, J., and K.M. Joseph, J. Can a conviction for murder be sustained solely on circumstantial evidence? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Parricide Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Sexual Assault Case Despite Hostile Witness: Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi vs. State of Gujarat (28 September 2018)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 161, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 313, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 344, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 145, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 45, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376(2)(f), Judges, K.M. Joseph, Navin Sinha, Offences Against Women, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Sexual Assault Case Despite Hostile Witness: Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi vs. State of Gujarat (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction for sexual assault can be upheld when the victim turns hostile during trial, but other evidence corroborates the assault. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Sexual Assault Case Name: Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Sexual Assault Case Despite Hostile Witness: Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi vs. State of Gujarat (28 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction: Jagjit Singh vs. State of Punjab (26 September 2018)

/ Dowry Death, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 113-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304-B, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Navin Sinha, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction: Jagjit Singh vs. State of Punjab (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused was rightly convicted for dowry death under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: Jagjit Singh vs. State of Punjab Judgment Date: 26 September 2018 Date of the Judgment: 26

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction: Jagjit Singh vs. State of Punjab (26 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case, Modifies Sentencing: Shamim vs. State (2018)

/ Evidence Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Injured Witness, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Navin Sinha, Offences Against Human Body, Ranjan Gogoi, Witness Testimony

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case, Modifies Sentencing: Shamim vs. State (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in reversing the trial court’s acquittal of the appellant in a double murder case and whether the denial of remission was justified. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Smt. Shamim vs. State (GNCT of

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case, Modifies Sentencing: Shamim vs. State (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies tenant’s liability for municipal tax under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act: M/S Popat & Kotecha Property vs. Ashim Kumar Dey (2018) INSC 704 (09 August 2018)

/ Judges, Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 with Section 231, Navin Sinha, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi, West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 with Section 5(8)

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant’s Obligation to Pay Municipal Tax Under West Bengal Tenancy Act Date of the Judgment: 09 August 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 704 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J., R. Banumathi, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can a tenant be evicted for not paying their share of municipal taxes? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court clarifies tenant’s liability for municipal tax under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act: M/S Popat & Kotecha Property vs. Ashim Kumar Dey (2018) INSC 704 (09 August 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles interpretation of tax exemption notifications: Commissioner of Customs vs. Dilip Kumar (30 July 2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 265, Customs Law, Customs Law with Section 25 of the Customs Act, Judges, Legislative Intent, Literal Rule, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi, S. Abdul Nazeer, Statutory Interpretation, Tax Exemption

Supreme Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Interpretation: Commissioner of Customs vs. Dilip Kumar (2018) Date of the Judgment: 30 July 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 645 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Ranjan Gogoi, J., R. Banumathi, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical question regarding the interpretation of

Supreme Court settles interpretation of tax exemption notifications: Commissioner of Customs vs. Dilip Kumar (30 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Special Status in Tariff Determination: Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. vs. Damodar Valley Corporation (23 July 2018)

/ Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 20, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 40, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 14, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 174, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 61, Finance, Accounts and Audit, Judges, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Special Status in Tariff Determination: Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. vs. Damodar Valley Corporation (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) is governed by the Electricity Act, 2003, or if the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, continues to apply for tariff determination. CASE TYPE: Electricity Tariff Regulation. Case Name: Bhaskar

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Special Status in Tariff Determination: Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. vs. Damodar Valley Corporation (23 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination: A Review of Electricity Act, 2003 (23 July 2018)

/ Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 20, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 40, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 14, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 174, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 61, Judges, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination: A Review of Electricity Act, 2003 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) is governed by the Electricity Act, 2003 or the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 for tariff determination. CASE TYPE: Electricity Tariff Regulation Case Name: Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. Etc. Etc. vs. Damodar Valley Corporation &

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination: A Review of Electricity Act, 2003 (23 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination, Clarifying the Interplay Between the Electricity Act and the DVC Act (23 July 2018)

/ Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 20, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 40, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 14, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 174, Judges, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination: A Detailed Analysis Date of the Judgment: 23 July 2018 Citation: [Not Available in the Source] Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J, R. Banumathi, J. Can a regulatory body’s tariff regulations override specific provisions of a parent act? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case concerning

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination, Clarifying the Interplay Between the Electricity Act and the DVC Act (23 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Bribery Case: State of Gujarat vs. Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi (2018)

/ Bribery, Criminal Law, Judges, Misconduct by Public Servant, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 20, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Bribery Case: State of Gujarat vs. Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the demand and acceptance of a bribe by a public servant is proven beyond reasonable doubt based on the evidence presented. CASE TYPE: Criminal (Prevention of Corruption Act). Case Name: The State of Gujarat vs. Navinbhai Chandrakant

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Bribery Case: State of Gujarat vs. Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows use of ‘Malabar’ with ‘Baroma’ for Biryani Rice: Parakh Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. vs. Baroma Agro Product (2018)

/ Class 30, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Descriptive Trademarks, Judges, Passing Off, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Trademark Infringement, Trademark Law

Supreme Court Allows Use of ‘Malabar’ with ‘Baroma’ for Biryani Rice: Parakh Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. vs. Baroma Agro Product (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party can claim exclusive rights over a descriptive word like ‘MALABAR’ in the sale of Biryani Rice. CASE TYPE: Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case Name: Parakh Vanijya Private Limited vs.

Supreme Court allows use of ‘Malabar’ with ‘Baroma’ for Biryani Rice: Parakh Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. vs. Baroma Agro Product (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top