Rohinton F. Nariman

Supreme Court Upholds Strict Tender Compliance in Vidarbha Irrigation Case (23 January 2019)

January 23, 2019 / Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 2.22, Contract Law with Clause 2.35, Judges, Navin Sinha, Rohinton F. Nariman, Tender Conditions

Supreme Court Upholds Strict Tender Compliance in Vidarbha Irrigation Case (23 January 2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a deviation from the stipulated period of a bank guarantee in a tender document can be condoned. CASE TYPE: Government Contract Law. Case Name: Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation vs. M/S Anoj Kumar Garwala. [Judgment Date]: 23 January 2019 Date […]

Supreme Court Upholds Strict Tender Compliance in Vidarbha Irrigation Case (23 January 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the interplay between Winding-Up Petitions and IBC Proceedings: Forech India Ltd. vs. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd. (22 January 2019)

January 22, 2019 / Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 433, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 434, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 238, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 7, Judges, Navin Sinha, Rohinton F. Nariman, Winding-up

Supreme Court Clarifies the interplay between Winding-Up Petitions and IBC Proceedings: Forech India Ltd. vs. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: The interplay between winding-up petitions filed under the Companies Act and insolvency proceedings initiated under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Forech India Ltd. vs.

Supreme Court clarifies the interplay between Winding-Up Petitions and IBC Proceedings: Forech India Ltd. vs. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd. (22 January 2019) Read Post »