S. A. Bobde

Supreme Court Orders Protection of Great Indian Bustard and Lesser Florican: M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2021) INSC 217 (19 April 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 135, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 166(2), Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 with Section 2(a), Environmental Law, Judges, Public Trust Doctrine, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Orders Protection of Great Indian Bustard and Lesser Florican Date of the Judgment: 19 April 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 217 Judges: S. A. Bobde (Chief Justice of India), A.S. Bopanna J., and V. Ramasubramanian J. Can India’s endangered bird species be saved from extinction? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question […]

Supreme Court Orders Protection of Great Indian Bustard and Lesser Florican: M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2021) INSC 217 (19 April 2021) Read Post »

Gokarna Temple Administration: Supreme Court Orders Interim Committee in Ramachandrapura Math vs. Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, B.N. Srikrishna, Judges, Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997, Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 with Section 1(4), Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 with Section 20-A, Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 with Section 23, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Intervenes in Gokarna Temple Dispute: Ramachandrapura Math vs. Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute over the administration and ownership of the Gokarna Mahabaleshwara Temple. CASE TYPE: Religious and Charitable Endowments Law Case Name: Ramachandrapura Math vs. Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru & Ors. Judgment Date: April 19, 2021 Introduction Date of the

Gokarna Temple Administration: Supreme Court Orders Interim Committee in Ramachandrapura Math vs. Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedures for Section 138 NI Act cases to expedite trials (16 April 2021)

/ A. S. Bopanna, B. R. Gavai, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 202, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 219, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 258, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 143, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 145, S. A. Bobde, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedures for Section 138 NI Act Cases to Expedite Trials LEGAL ISSUE: Streamlining procedures for trials under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to ensure expeditious disposal of cases. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: In Re: EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT 1881. Judgment Date: 16

Supreme Court clarifies procedures for Section 138 NI Act cases to expedite trials (16 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Arbitration Despite Previous Settlement Claim in Property Dispute

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(5), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order II Rule 2, Judges, Res Judicata, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Orders Arbitration Despite Previous Settlement Claim in Property Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute exists for arbitration when a previous court order noted a settlement between parties, but no formal settlement agreement was recorded. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: V. Sreenivasa Reddy vs. B.L. Rathnamma [Judgment Date]: April 08, 2021 Date of the

Supreme Court Orders Arbitration Despite Previous Settlement Claim in Property Dispute Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Stay Electoral Bond Scheme: Association for Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India (26 March 2021)

/ A. S. Bopanna, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 128, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 129, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 182, Constitutional Law, Electoral Bond Scheme, Judges, Representation of the People Act, 1951, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 29C, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 31, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Refuses to Stay Electoral Bond Scheme: Association for Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018 should be stayed. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Law Case Name: Association for Democratic Reforms & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 26 March 2021 Date

Supreme Court Refuses to Stay Electoral Bond Scheme: Association for Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India (26 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court extends limitation period due to COVID-19: In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 23(4), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 29A, Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 12A, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, S. A. Bobde, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court extends limitation period due to COVID-19: In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Extension of limitation period due to COVID-19 pandemic. CASE TYPE: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil). Case Name: In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation. Judgment Date: March 8, 2021 Date of the Judgment: March 8, 2021 Citation:

Supreme Court extends limitation period due to COVID-19: In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pre-deposit requirements under RDBA Act: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Ambuj A. Kasliwal (2021)

/ A. S. Bopanna, Judges, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 with Section 21, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court clarifies pre-deposit requirements under RDBA Act: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Ambuj A. Kasliwal (2021) Date of the Judgment: February 16, 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 78 Judges: S. A. Bobde, CJI, A. S. Bopanna, J, V. Ramasubramanian, J. The judgment was authored by Justice A.S. Bopanna. Can an appellate tribunal completely waive the mandatory

Supreme Court clarifies pre-deposit requirements under RDBA Act: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Ambuj A. Kasliwal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits registration of BS-IV vehicles for essential services: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (2020)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Air Pollution, BS-IV Emission Standards, Environmental Law, Essential Services, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian, Vehicle Registration

Supreme Court permits registration of BS-IV vehicles for essential services: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether BS-IV compliant vehicles used for essential services can be registered despite restrictions on such vehicles. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Public Interest Litigation. Case Name: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India Judgment Date: November 2, 2020

Supreme Court permits registration of BS-IV vehicles for essential services: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs CBI Probe and CRPF Security in Hathras Case: Satyama Dubey & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (27 October 2020)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, S. A. Bobde, Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 15, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Directs CBI Probe and CRPF Security in Hathras Case: Satyama Dubey & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (27 October 2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring fair investigation and witness protection in a case of alleged gang rape and murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Writ Petition Case Name: Satyama Dubey & Ors. vs. Union of

Supreme Court Directs CBI Probe and CRPF Security in Hathras Case: Satyama Dubey & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (27 October 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tamil Nadu’s Elephant Corridor Notification: Protecting Wildlife and Habitats (2020)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Constitutional Law with Article 48A, Fundamental Rights, Judges, S. A. Bobde, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna, Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 with Section 2

Supreme Court Upholds Elephant Corridor Notification in Tamil Nadu LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the validity of a State Government notification establishing an elephant corridor and directing the eviction of private landowners from the area. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Wildlife Protection Case Name: HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATION OF MUDUMALAI VERSUS IN DEFENCE OF ENVIRONMENT

Supreme Court Upholds Tamil Nadu’s Elephant Corridor Notification: Protecting Wildlife and Habitats (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Vacates Status Quo Order in Land Dispute: Hanumappa vs. State of Karnataka (2020)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Civil Procedure, Interim Orders, Judges, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, Land Law, S. A. Bobde, Special Leave Petition, Tenancy Disputes, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Vacates Status Quo Order in Land Dispute: Hanumappa vs. State of Karnataka (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a status quo order should continue in a land dispute where a tenant’s claim is contested and the land’s nature has changed. CASE TYPE: Land Dispute/Tenancy Case Name: Hanumappa (Since Deceased) by His Lrs. & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Vacates Status Quo Order in Land Dispute: Hanumappa vs. State of Karnataka (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause applicability in Balasore Alloys vs. Medima LLC (16 September 2020)

/ A. S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, International Commercial Arbitration, Judges, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause applicability in Balasore Alloys vs. Medima LLC LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct arbitration clause when multiple agreements exist between the same parties for the same transaction. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Balasore Alloys Limited vs. Medima LLC Judgment Date: 16 September 2020 Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2020

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause applicability in Balasore Alloys vs. Medima LLC (16 September 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top