S.A. Bobde

Supreme Court clarifies promotion eligibility for ad-hoc engineers: Siraj Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019)

/ B.R. Gavai, Judges, Promotion, Regularization, S.A. Bobde, Seniority, Service Law, Surya Kant, U.P. Development Authorities Centralized Services Rules, 1985, U.P. Development Authorities Centralized Services Rules, 1985 with Rule 24(3)

Supreme Court Clarifies Regularization and Promotion Rights for Ad-Hoc Employees: Siraj Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether prior ad-hoc service of an employee appointed through a selection process can be counted for promotion after regularization, even if the initial appointment lacked formal concurrence from the Public Service Commission. CASE TYPE: Service […]

Supreme Court clarifies promotion eligibility for ad-hoc engineers: Siraj Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants parity in land acquisition compensation despite delay: Ningappa Thotappa Angadi vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2019)

/ B.R. Gavai, Compensation Law, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Parity in Compensation, S.A. Bobde, Surya Kant

Supreme Court grants parity in land acquisition compensation despite delay: Ningappa Thotappa Angadi vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land owner who did not appeal a High Court order in a timely manner can receive the same compensation as other land owners who did appeal promptly in the same land acquisition

Supreme Court grants parity in land acquisition compensation despite delay: Ningappa Thotappa Angadi vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Regularization of Ad-hoc Employees: Rajnish Kumar Mishra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019)

/ Ad-hoc Appointments, B.R. Gavai, Judges, Regularization of Employees, S.A. Bobde, Service Law, Surya Kant, Uttar Pradesh Regularization of Ad-hoc Appointment Rules, 1979, Uttar Pradesh Regularization Rules, Uttar Pradesh Regularization Rules with cut-off date 31.12.2001

Supreme Court Orders Regularization of Ad-hoc Employees: Rajnish Kumar Mishra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether ad-hoc employees who have worked for more than 10 years are entitled to regularization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Rajnish Kumar Mishra & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Judgment Date: 13 December

Supreme Court Orders Regularization of Ad-hoc Employees: Rajnish Kumar Mishra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the Ayodhya Land Dispute: Title Granted to Deity, Land to Waqf Board (2019)

/ Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act 1993, Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 145, Constitutional Law, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991 with Section 5, Ranjan Gogoi, S. Abdul Nazeer, S.A. Bobde

Supreme Court Resolves Ayodhya Dispute: Title Granted to Deity, Land to Waqf Board (2019) Date of the Judgment: 09 November 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 1086 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, S.A. Bobde, Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer (Majority Bench) Can a dispute over a piece of land, steeped in centuries of history, be

Supreme Court settles the Ayodhya Land Dispute: Title Granted to Deity, Land to Waqf Board (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for bank employees on deputation: Narendra Kumar vs. Syndicate Bank (2019)

/ Deputation, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Pension Benefits, S.A. Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Rules, Syndicate Bank Employees’ Pension Regulations, 1995, Syndicate Bank Employees’ Pension Regulations, 1995 with Clause 22(2)

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for bank employees on deputation: Narendra Kumar vs. Syndicate Bank (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s past service can be forfeited due to a minor procedural lapse when joining a new post while on deputation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Narendra Kumar vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Syndicate Bank

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for bank employees on deputation: Narendra Kumar vs. Syndicate Bank (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles if Dharmada is part of Transaction Value in Central Excise Cases (9 April 2019)

/ Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 4, Deepak Gupta, Judges, S.A. Bobde, Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 with Section 2(h), Sale of Goods Act, 1930 with Section 4, Transaction Value, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies: Dharmada is Not Part of Transaction Value in Excise Duty Cases (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Dharmada, a voluntary charitable donation, is part of the transaction value for excise duty calculation. CASE TYPE: Central Excise Case Name: M/s D.J. Malpani vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik Judgment Date: 9 April 2019 Introduction Date

Supreme Court settles if Dharmada is part of Transaction Value in Central Excise Cases (9 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Multiplier Calculation for Bachelor’s Death in Motor Accident Claims (2019)

/ Compensation Law, Judges, Loss of Dependency, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 140, Multiplier Method, S.A. Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Clarifies Multiplier Calculation in Motor Accident Claims for Bachelor’s Death (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the correct multiplier for calculating compensation in motor accident death claims when the deceased is a bachelor. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation. Case Name: M/S. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Mandala Yadagari Goud & Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court settles Multiplier Calculation for Bachelor’s Death in Motor Accident Claims (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of blacklisting in tender processes: Caretel Infotech Ltd. vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 20 of Tender Document, Judges, S.A. Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Tender Process

Supreme Court Clarifies Blacklisting in Tender Processes: Caretel Infotech Ltd. vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a show cause notice for blacklisting amounts to initiation of blacklisting, disqualifying a bidder from a tender process. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process. Case Name: Caretel Infotech Ltd. vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of blacklisting in tender processes: Caretel Infotech Ltd. vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits three accused in a murder case due to lack of evidence: Peer Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 161, Deepak Gupta, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 148, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, S.A. Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court acquits three accused in a murder case due to lack of evidence: Peer Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused were present at the scene of the crime and participated in the murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Peer Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. [Judgment Date]: April

Supreme Court acquits three accused in a murder case due to lack of evidence: Peer Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unpaid Leave for Pension Eligibility in VRS Cases: Delhi Transport Corporation vs. Balwan Singh & Ors. (26 February 2019)

/ Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 21, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Pension Law, S.A. Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unpaid Leave for Pension Eligibility in VRS Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether periods of unauthorized absence, for which no salary is paid, can be excluded when calculating qualifying service for pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, specifically for employees who opted for the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS). CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unpaid Leave for Pension Eligibility in VRS Cases: Delhi Transport Corporation vs. Balwan Singh & Ors. (26 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case: Nand Kishore vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 354(3), Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 366, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376(2)(i), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Offences Against Human Body, R. Subhash Reddy, S.A. Bobde

Supreme Court Modifies Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case: Nand Kishore vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty was appropriately imposed in a case of child rape and murder based on circumstantial evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Nand Kishore vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Modifies Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case: Nand Kishore vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Penalty in Rape and Murder Case: Raju Jagdish Paswan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 354, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 366, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Offences Against Human Body, R. Subhash Reddy, Right to Life, S.A. Bobde

Supreme Court Commutes Death Penalty in Rape and Murder Case: Raju Jagdish Paswan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Date of the Judgment: January 17, 2019 Citation: Raju Jagdish Paswan v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appeal Nos. 88-89 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos.5422-5423 of 2013) Judges: S.A. Bobde, J., L. Nageswara Rao, J.,

Supreme Court Commutes Death Penalty in Rape and Murder Case: Raju Jagdish Paswan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top