S.A. Bobde

Supreme Court clarifies incorporation of arbitration clause by reference to standard terms: Inox Wind Ltd. vs. Thermocables Ltd. (2018)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 7(5), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, S.A. Bobde

Supreme Court Clarifies Incorporation of Arbitration Clauses in Contracts: Inox Wind Ltd. vs. Thermocables Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a general reference to standard terms and conditions in a contract is sufficient to incorporate an arbitration clause. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/S. INOX WIND LTD. vs M/S THERMOCABLES LTD. Judgment Date: 05 January […]

Supreme Court clarifies incorporation of arbitration clause by reference to standard terms: Inox Wind Ltd. vs. Thermocables Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Imposing Major Penalties in Bank Service Rules: State Bank of India vs. B.R. Saini (2017)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 311(2), Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Principles of Natural Justice, Rule 68(3), State Bank of India Officers Service Rules, S.A. Bobde, Service Law, State Bank of India Officers Service Rules

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a second show-cause notice is required before imposing a major penalty on a bank employee after the disciplinary authority has already provided the inquiry report and an opportunity to respond. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State Bank of India & Ors. vs. B.R. Saini Judgment Date: 15 December 2017 Date of

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Imposing Major Penalties in Bank Service Rules: State Bank of India vs. B.R. Saini (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies OBC reservation for central posts in Uttarakhand: Khilendra Singh & Ors. vs. Union of India (28 November 2017)

/ Appointment to Government Posts, Central Government Services, Constitutional Law, Equality before law, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993, Other Backward Classes (OBC), Reservation in Government Jobs, Reservation Law, S.A. Bobde, Service Law, Social Justice

Date of the Judgment: 28 November 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 19862 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 14201 of 2011) and Civil Appeal Nos. 19859-19860 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil ) Nos. 18584-85 of 2012) Judges: S.A. Bobde, J. and L. Nageswara Rao, J. Can a

Supreme Court clarifies OBC reservation for central posts in Uttarakhand: Khilendra Singh & Ors. vs. Union of India (28 November 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right: Sakharam Ganesh Pujari vs. Husen Aba Bahadur (2017)

/ Agricultural Land, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948 with Chapter IIIAA, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948 with Section 32F, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948 with Section 32P, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Landlord Rights, Landlord-Tenant Law, S.A. Bobde, Tenant Rights

Can a tenant’s right to purchase land be extended indefinitely, even after the statutory period has expired? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948. This judgment clarifies the timelines for tenants to exercise their purchase rights, especially when a landlord has served in

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right: Sakharam Ganesh Pujari vs. Husen Aba Bahadur (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Ankur Kapoor vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2017)

/ Compensation for Permanent Disability, Judges, Loss of Future Earnings, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Motor Accident Claims, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, S.A. Bobde

Can a court enhance compensation awarded by a lower court in a motor accident claim? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, focusing on the adequacy of compensation for a young man with a permanent disability. This case highlights the principles used to calculate compensation in motor accident claims, specifically

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Ankur Kapoor vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Medical Lab Technicians: Sukhwinder Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. (2017)

/ Eligibility Criteria, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Punjab Health and Family Welfare Technical (Group-C) Service Rules, 2007, Punjab Health and Family Welfare Technical (Group-C) Service Rules, 2007 with Appendix B, Recruitment Rules, S.A. Bobde, Service Law

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates who possess a matriculation certificate and a diploma in Medical Laboratory Technology are eligible for appointment as Medical Laboratory Technicians, despite rules requiring a Senior Secondary certificate. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Sukhwinder Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. Judgment Date: 04 September 2017 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Medical Lab Technicians: Sukhwinder Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes MCI’s directive on NRI quota in Manipal University: Manipal University vs. Union of India (2017)

/ Deemed University, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Medical Council Act, Medical Council Act with Section 10-A, Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997, S.A. Bobde, University Grants Commission Act

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Medical Council of India (MCI) has the authority to regulate the admission of Non-Resident Indian (NRI) students in medical colleges. CASE TYPE: Education Law; Regulatory Law Case Name: Manipal University & Anr. vs. Union of India & Anr. Judgment Date: July 3, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: July 3, 2017

Supreme Court quashes MCI’s directive on NRI quota in Manipal University: Manipal University vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Eligibility in Teacher Recruitment: Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (29 July 2013)

/ B.S. Chauhan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Provisional Appointment, Recruitment Rules, S.A. Bobde, Service Law, Service Law with Eligibility Criteria

Date of the Judgment: 29 July 2013 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 6116 of 2013 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. and S.A. Bobde, J. Can a candidate be appointed to a government job if they did not possess the required educational qualification on the last date for submitting applications? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Eligibility in Teacher Recruitment: Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (29 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles procedure for Disciplinary Authority disagreement with Enquiry Officer in service law cases: S.P. Malhotra vs. Punjab National Bank (2013) INSC 451 (4 July 2013)

/ B.S. Chauhan, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Natural Justice, S.A. Bobde, Service Law, Service Law with Punjab National Bank Officers/Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations 1977

Date of the Judgment: 4 July 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 451 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan and S.A. Bobde, JJ. Can a disciplinary authority impose punishment by disagreeing with the findings of the Enquiry Officer without giving the delinquent employee a chance to respond? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a service

Supreme Court settles procedure for Disciplinary Authority disagreement with Enquiry Officer in service law cases: S.P. Malhotra vs. Punjab National Bank (2013) INSC 451 (4 July 2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top