S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case

/ A.K. Sikri, Constitutional Law, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 5A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Property, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether landowners are entitled to compensation when their land was acquired without proper procedure and construction was carried out on it. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Lt. Col. J.B. Kuchhal (Dead) Through Lrs. And Ors. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of review petitions after dismissal of special leave petitions in civil cases: Khoday Distilleries Ltd. vs. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd. (01 March 2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 47 Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 96, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Judges, M.R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Clarifies Maintainability of Review Petitions After Dismissal of Special Leave Petitions: Khoday Distilleries Ltd. vs. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition is maintainable before the High Court after the Supreme Court has dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) against the same judgment. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of review petitions after dismissal of special leave petitions in civil cases: Khoday Distilleries Ltd. vs. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd. (01 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies deduction under Section 80HH of Income Tax Act: Vijay Industries vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 4, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 80AB, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 80HH, Judges, M. R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction Under Section 80HH of Income Tax Act: Vijay Industries vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding deductions for industrial undertakings in backward areas. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Case Name: M/S. VIJAY INDUSTRIES VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court clarifies deduction under Section 80HH of Income Tax Act: Vijay Industries vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Strikes Down Gujarat’s Ban on Inter-State Sand Movement: State of Gujarat vs. Jayeshbhai Kanjibhai Kalathiya (2019) INSC 174 (01 March 2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 301, Freedom of Trade and Commerce, Judges, M.R. Shah, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 with Section 15, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 with Section 23C, Mining and Mineral Law, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Strikes Down Gujarat’s Ban on Inter-State Sand Movement LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a State Government can prohibit the movement of legally excavated minor minerals, specifically sand, beyond its borders. CASE TYPE: Mining and Mineral Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: State of Gujarat and Others vs. Jayeshbhai Kanjibhai Kalathiya [Judgment Date]: 01 March 2019 Date

Supreme Court Strikes Down Gujarat’s Ban on Inter-State Sand Movement: State of Gujarat vs. Jayeshbhai Kanjibhai Kalathiya (2019) INSC 174 (01 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Disposal of Goods on Public Premises: Board of Trustees vs. APL India (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Eviction Law, Judges, Lien, Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 with Section 59, Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 with Section 61, Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 with Section 6, S. Abdul Nazeer, Unauthorised Occupation

Supreme Court Clarifies Disposal of Goods on Public Premises: Board of Trustees vs. APL India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 6 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, regarding the disposal of goods found on public premises. CASE TYPE: Public Premises Law, Eviction Law Case Name: Board of Trustees for the

Supreme Court Clarifies Disposal of Goods on Public Premises: Board of Trustees vs. APL India (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders CBI Review of SIT Report in Double Murder Case: Smt. Sunita Devi vs. Union of India (20 February 2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 394, Investigation, Judges, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Orders CBI Review of SIT Report in Double Murder Case Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2019 Citation: Not Available Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can a court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) report be further scrutinized? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving the

Supreme Court Orders CBI Review of SIT Report in Double Murder Case: Smt. Sunita Devi vs. Union of India (20 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Child Kidnapping and Murder Case: Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar vs. State of Maharashtra (20 February 2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 364, Judges, M. R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Child Kidnapping and Murder Case Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2019 Citation: Not Available in the source. Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J., and M. R. Shah, J. Can a death sentence be commuted to life imprisonment based on the convict’s reformation in

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Child Kidnapping and Murder Case: Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar vs. State of Maharashtra (20 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows 100% Tax Exemption Post Substantial Expansion Under Section 80-IC: Aarham Softronics Case (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 80-IC, Industrial Undertakings, Judges, M. R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer, Tax Exemptions

Supreme Court Allows 100% Tax Exemption Post Substantial Expansion Under Section 80-IC: Aarham Softronics Case (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an assessee who initially availed 100% tax exemption under Section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for setting up a new industry can claim the same 100% exemption again after carrying out a substantial expansion

Supreme Court Allows 100% Tax Exemption Post Substantial Expansion Under Section 80-IC: Aarham Softronics Case (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Timely Appointment of Information Commissioners for Effective RTI Implementation

/ A.K. Sikri, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(a), Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Right to Information Act, 2005, Right to Information Act, 2005 with Section 12, Right to Information Act, 2005 with Section 15, Right to Information Act, 2005 with Section 3, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Directs Timely Appointment of Information Commissioners for Effective RTI Implementation LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring the effective implementation of the Right to Information Act, 2005 through timely appointments to the Central and State Information Commissions. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the Right to Information. Case Name: Anjali Bhardwaj and Others vs. Union of

Supreme Court Directs Timely Appointment of Information Commissioners for Effective RTI Implementation Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies benefits for daily wage workers in Gujarat Forest Department: State of Gujarat vs. PWD and Forest Employees Union (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Daily Wage Workers, Government Resolution dated October 17, 1988, Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 2009, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, S. Abdul Nazeer, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies benefits for daily wage workers in Gujarat Forest Department (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation and implementation of a Government Resolution regarding benefits for daily wage workers. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Gujarat vs. PWD and Forest Employees Union Judgment Date: 15 February 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 15 February

Supreme Court clarifies benefits for daily wage workers in Gujarat Forest Department: State of Gujarat vs. PWD and Forest Employees Union (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Interest in Arbitration: Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. vs. THDC (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 31(7)(a), Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 50, Contract Law with Clause 51, Contractual Interpretation, Judges, M. R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Interest in Arbitration: Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. vs. THDC (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator can award interest when the contract between parties explicitly prohibits it. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. vs. Tehri Hydro Development Corporation India Ltd. Judgment Date: 07 February 2019 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Interest in Arbitration: Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. vs. THDC (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court commutes death penalty in POCSO case: Vijay Raikwar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376(2)(f), Judges, M.R. Shah, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 with Section 6, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court commutes death penalty in POCSO case: Vijay Raikwar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty imposed on the accused for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was justified in the facts and circumstances of the case. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court commutes death penalty in POCSO case: Vijay Raikwar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top