S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court settles the status of sub-lessees under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960: Hardev Singh vs. Prescribed Authority, Kashipur (2022) INSC 27 (10 January 2022)

/ Government Grants Act, 1895, Government Grants Act, 1895 with Section 2, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Abdul Nazeer, Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 3(9), Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 5

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ceiling Act: Sub-lessees Not Independent Tenure Holders LEGAL ISSUE: Whether sub-lessees of government land acquire independent tenure holder status under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. CASE TYPE: Land Ceiling Law Case Name: Hardev Singh vs. Prescribed Authority, Kashipur & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 10 January 2022 […]

Supreme Court settles the status of sub-lessees under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960: Hardev Singh vs. Prescribed Authority, Kashipur (2022) INSC 27 (10 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ceiling Act: Sub-Lessee Not Independent Tenure Holder in Uttar Pradesh (10 January 2022)

/ Government Grants Act, 1895, Government Grants Act, 1895 with Section 2, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Abdul Nazeer, Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 3(17), Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 3(9), Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 5

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ceiling Act: Sub-Lessee Not Independent Tenure Holder LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sub-lessee of land under a government grant acquires the status of an independent tenure holder under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. CASE TYPE: Land Ceiling Law Case Name: Hardev Singh vs. Prescribed Authority, Kashipur

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ceiling Act: Sub-Lessee Not Independent Tenure Holder in Uttar Pradesh (10 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Rasmita Biswal & Ors. vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2021)

/ Appellate Tribunal, Judges, Krishna Murari, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 173, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Rasmita Biswal & Ors. vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation in motor accident claims, including future prospects and conventional heads. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Rasmita Biswal & Ors. vs. Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. and Anr. [Judgment

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Rasmita Biswal & Ors. vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismissing Claims of Concealment: Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors. (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Mysore (Personal & Miscellaneous) Inam Abolition Act, 1954, Mysore (Personal & Miscellaneous) Inam Abolition Act, 1954 with Section 5, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismissing Claims of Concealment: Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the writ petition on grounds of suppression of material facts and whether the land acquisition by Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) was valid. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismissing Claims of Concealment: Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Dismissal of Second Appeals: Hasmat Ali vs. Amina Bibi (2021)

/ Appellate Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLII, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Dismissal in Limine, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Abdul Nazeer, Second Appeal

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Dismissal of Second Appeals: Hasmat Ali vs. Amina Bibi (2021) Date of the Judgment: November 29, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 790 Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can a High Court dismiss a second appeal without providing any reasons? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Dismissal of Second Appeals: Hasmat Ali vs. Amina Bibi (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Haryana’s Stand on Art & Craft Diploma Equivalency: Devender Bhaskar vs. State of Haryana (24 November 2021)

/ Distance Education, Equivalence of Educational Qualifications, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Abdul Nazeer, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Haryana’s Stand on Art & Craft Diploma Equivalency: Devender Bhaskar vs. State of Haryana (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a diploma in Art and Craft obtained through distance education from Kurukshetra University is equivalent to a diploma awarded by the Haryana Industrial Training Department for the purpose of appointment as an Arts and

Supreme Court Upholds Haryana’s Stand on Art & Craft Diploma Equivalency: Devender Bhaskar vs. State of Haryana (24 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes criminal charges in property dispute: Mitesh Kumar J. Sha vs. State of Karnataka (26 October 2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 406, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges, Krishna Murari, Offences Relating to Property, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Charges in Property Dispute: Mitesh Kumar J. Sha vs. State of Karnataka (2021) Date of the Judgment: 26 October 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 751 Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can a civil dispute over a property sale be escalated into a criminal case? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court quashes criminal charges in property dispute: Mitesh Kumar J. Sha vs. State of Karnataka (26 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court expands definition of ‘legal representative’ in motor accident claims: N. Jayasree vs. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd. (25 October 2021)

/ Compensation Law, Future Prospects, Judges, Krishna Murari, Legal Representative, Loss of Dependency, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 168, S. Abdul Nazeer, Split Multiplier

Supreme Court expands definition of ‘legal representative’ in motor accident claims: N. Jayasree vs. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd. (25 October 2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a mother-in-law can be considered a ‘legal representative’ for the purpose of claiming compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Also, whether a split multiplier should be applied when

Supreme Court expands definition of ‘legal representative’ in motor accident claims: N. Jayasree vs. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd. (25 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Abetment of Suicide Charges Against Teacher: Geo V Arghese vs. State of Rajasthan (2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 107, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 306, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Quashes Abetment of Suicide Charges Against Teacher: Geo V Arghese vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a teacher’s act of reprimanding a student for indiscipline can be considered abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Geo V Arghese vs. The State

Supreme Court Quashes Abetment of Suicide Charges Against Teacher: Geo V Arghese vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Pendente Lite Interest in Arbitration: Garg Builders vs. BHEL (2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 31(7)(a), Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 28, Interest Act, 1978, Interest Act, 1978 with Section 3, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.A. Khan, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Pendente Lite Interest in Arbitration: Garg Builders vs. BHEL (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator can award pendente lite interest when the contract between the parties explicitly bars it. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Garg Builders vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited [Judgment Date]: October 4, 2021 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Pendente Lite Interest in Arbitration: Garg Builders vs. BHEL (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Gumansinh vs. State (2021)

/ Evidence Act, 1872, Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 113A, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 306, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Krishna Murari, Offences Against Marriage, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Gumansinh vs. State (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused can be convicted for abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 when the death of the married woman occurs within seven years of marriage and there is evidence of

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Gumansinh vs. State (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021)

/ Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR), Civil Appeals, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer, Supreme Court Judgments, Telecom Law, Telecom Regulatory

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether clerical or arithmetical errors in the calculation of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues can be rectified despite a previous Supreme Court order prohibiting reassessment. CASE TYPE: Telecom Regulatory/Civil Case Name: Union

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top