S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions on Aadhaar Act as Money Bill: Beghar Foundation vs. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) (2021) INSC 12

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 110, Constitutional Law with Article 122, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, Money Bill, Parliamentary Procedure, S. Abdul Nazeer, Speaker's Decision

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions on Aadhaar Act as Money Bill Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 12 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer, B.R. Gavai, and Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (dissenting). This was a 4:1 majority decision, with Justice Khanwilkar writing the majority opinion and Justice Chandrachud dissenting. […]

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions on Aadhaar Act as Money Bill: Beghar Foundation vs. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) (2021) INSC 12 Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation: Kirti & Anr. vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (2021)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 168, N.V. Ramana, Offences Affecting Life, S. Abdul Nazeer, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation: Kirti & Anr. vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation in motor accident claims, particularly concerning notional income for homemakers and the application of future prospects. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Kirti & Anr. vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Judgment Date: 05

Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation: Kirti & Anr. vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting Order: UMC Technologies vs. Food Corporation of India (2020)

/ Administrative Law, B.R. Gavai, Blacklisting, Blacklisting, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 42.1, Judges, Principles of Natural Justice, S. Abdul Nazeer, Show Cause Notice

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting Order: UMC Technologies vs. Food Corporation of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a blacklisting order is valid if the show cause notice does not explicitly mention the intention to blacklist. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Administrative Law Case Name: UMC Technologies Private Limited vs. Food Corporation of India and Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting Order: UMC Technologies vs. Food Corporation of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tamil Nadu’s Elephant Corridor Notification: Protecting Wildlife and Habitats (2020)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Constitutional Law with Article 48A, Fundamental Rights, Judges, S. A. Bobde, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna, Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 with Section 2

Supreme Court Upholds Elephant Corridor Notification in Tamil Nadu LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the validity of a State Government notification establishing an elephant corridor and directing the eviction of private landowners from the area. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Wildlife Protection Case Name: HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATION OF MUDUMALAI VERSUS IN DEFENCE OF ENVIRONMENT

Supreme Court Upholds Tamil Nadu’s Elephant Corridor Notification: Protecting Wildlife and Habitats (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Additional Documents in Civil Suit: Sugandhi vs. P. Rajkumar (2020)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 13 Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 8 Rule 1A, Judges, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Allows Additional Documents in Civil Suit: Sugandhi vs. P. Rajkumar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can allow the production of additional documents by a defendant at a later stage of a civil suit, after the written statement has been filed and the plaintiff’s evidence is concluded. CASE TYPE: Civil Procedure Case Name:

Supreme Court Allows Additional Documents in Civil Suit: Sugandhi vs. P. Rajkumar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules on juvenility of accused in a 1981 murder case: Satya Deo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Juvenile in Conflict with Law, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 with Section 2(l), Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 with Section 20, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court rules on juvenility of accused in a 1981 murder case: Satya Deo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) Date of the Judgment: October 7, 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 777 Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J. Can an individual, convicted of a crime committed as a minor under the Juvenile Justice Act,

Supreme Court rules on juvenility of accused in a 1981 murder case: Satya Deo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Award in Dispute Over Restaurant License Agreements: Arun Kumar Kamal Kumar vs. Selected Marble Home (2020)

/ Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Law, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Damages in Arbitration, Judges, License Agreements, N.V. Ramana, Property Law, Property Law with Section 108, S. Abdul Nazeer, Surya Kant, Transfer of Property Act

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Award in Dispute Over Restaurant License Agreements: Arun Kumar Kamal Kumar vs. Selected Marble Home (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator was justified in awarding damages for use and occupation of premises based on commission, when the agreement did not explicitly provide for such damages. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/S

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Award in Dispute Over Restaurant License Agreements: Arun Kumar Kamal Kumar vs. Selected Marble Home (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Enforcing Foreign Awards in Arbitration Cases: Government of India vs. Vedanta Limited (2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 47, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Contract Law with Article 15.5, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 137, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Production Sharing Contract, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Enforcing Foreign Awards: Government of India vs. Vedanta Limited (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Limitation period for enforcing foreign arbitral awards in India. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Government of India vs. Vedanta Limited [Judgment Date]: 16 September 2020 Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 728 Judges:

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Enforcing Foreign Awards in Arbitration Cases: Government of India vs. Vedanta Limited (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Officer for Corruption: Pravin Kumar vs. Union of India (2020)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Disciplinary Proceedings, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Public Tranquillity, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, S. Abdul Nazeer, Service Law, Service Law with Article 311, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Officer for Corruption: Pravin Kumar vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of Judicial Review in Service Matters and Disciplinary Proceedings CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Pravin Kumar vs. Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date: 10 September 2020 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Officer for Corruption: Pravin Kumar vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Robbery Conviction: Mohd. Anwar vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (19 August 2020)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 394, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 84, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Property, S. Abdul Nazeer, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Robbery Conviction: Mohd. Anwar vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) Date of the Judgment: 19 August 2020 Citation: Mohd. Anwar v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi), Criminal Appeal No. 1551 of 2010 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J., Surya Kant, J. Can a conviction for robbery be upheld when the

Supreme Court Upholds Robbery Conviction: Mohd. Anwar vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (19 August 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows appeal despite 45-day delay in motor accident claim: Brahampal @ Sammay and Anr vs. National Insurance Company (2020)

/ Beneficial Legislation, Judges, Motor Accident Claims, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 173, N. V. Ramana, S. Abdul Nazeer, Surya Kant

Supreme Court allows appeal despite 45-day delay in motor accident claim: Brahampal @ Sammay and Anr vs. National Insurance Company (2020) Date of the Judgment: 07 August 2020 Citation: Brahampal @ Sammay and Anr vs. National Insurance Company (2020) INSC 498 Judges: N. V. Ramana, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J., and Surya Kant, J. Can

Supreme Court allows appeal despite 45-day delay in motor accident claim: Brahampal @ Sammay and Anr vs. National Insurance Company (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Forced Marriage: Mohammed Yousuff @ Moula & Anr. vs. The State of Karnataka (2020) INSC 488 (22 July 2020)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 343, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 366, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Forced Marriage Date of the Judgment: 22 July 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 488 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J., Surya Kant, J. Can a person be convicted for kidnapping even if the victim was forced into marriage and not just kidnapped? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Forced Marriage: Mohammed Yousuff @ Moula & Anr. vs. The State of Karnataka (2020) INSC 488 (22 July 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top