S.H. Kapadia

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Excise Refund Interest Claim: Union of India vs. Sterlite Industries (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 03, 2008 Judges: S.H. Kapadia, J. and B. Sudershan Reddy, J. When a company is entitled to a refund of excise duty, is it also entitled to interest on that refund? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving Sterlite Industries. The court set aside a […]

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Excise Refund Interest Claim: Union of India vs. Sterlite Industries (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles deduction calculation under Section 80HHC for export businesses: M/s. Mysodet (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 03, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5475 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7323 of 2007) Judges: Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justice B. Sudershan Reddy How should deductions be calculated for export businesses under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act when a company has both export and

Supreme Court settles deduction calculation under Section 80HHC for export businesses: M/s. Mysodet (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court mandates compulsory marriage registration across India: Seema vs. Ashwani Kumar (2006)

Date of the Judgment: 14th February 2006 Citation: Transfer Petition (civil) 291 of 2005 Judges: Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice S.H. Kapadia In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India addressed the pressing issue of unregistered marriages and their impact on women and children. The Court recognized that the absence of official marriage records

Supreme Court mandates compulsory marriage registration across India: Seema vs. Ashwani Kumar (2006) Read Post »

Title: Supreme Court affirms title by adverse possession in property dispute: Tej Narain vs. Shanti Swaroop Bohre (2004)

Date of the Judgment: 28/09/2004 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Ashok Bhan and S.H. Kapadia Can continuous possession of a property for over 12 years grant ownership, even without legal title? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Tej Narain vs.

Title: Supreme Court affirms title by adverse possession in property dispute: Tej Narain vs. Shanti Swaroop Bohre (2004) Read Post »

Scroll to Top