Supreme Court clarifies interest on delayed GST refunds: Union of India vs. Willowood Chemicals & Saraf Natural Stone (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct rate of interest applicable on delayed Goods and Services Tax (GST) refunds. CASE TYPE: Tax Law (Goods and Services Tax) Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. M/s. Willowood Chemicals […]
Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case: Mohd. Firoz vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt in a case of child rape and murder, and whether the death penalty
Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Refund with Interest for Delayed Apartment Possession LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a consumer is entitled to a refund with interest for delayed possession of an apartment despite a delay compensation clause in the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection Case Name: Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sushma Ashok Shiroor Judgment
Supreme Court Rules on Land Acquisition and Compensation: Sukh Dutt Ratra vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State can evade its responsibility to compensate landowners for land acquired without due process, citing delay and laches. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Constitutional Law. Case Name: Sukh Dutt Ratra & Anr. vs. State of
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Dowry Death Case: Sarepalli Sreenivas vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: April 06, 2022 The Supreme Court of India, in this case, addressed a critical issue of dowry death and the culpability of the husband and his family members. Can a death be classified as dowry
Supreme Court Clarifies Assessment of Amalgamated Companies: PCIT vs. Mahagun Realtors (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an assessment order in the name of an amalgamating company is valid after the company has ceased to exist due to amalgamation. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) – 2 vs. M/s. Mahagun
Supreme Court quashes LARSGESS Scheme benefits: Union of India vs. Bhagwan Deen (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether benefits can be claimed under the LARSGESS Scheme after its termination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Bhagwan Deen & Anr. Judgment Date: April 05, 2022 Date of the Judgment: April 05, 2022
Supreme Court quashes LARSGESS Scheme benefits: Union of India vs. Bhagwan Deen (2022) Read Post »
Supreme Court Grants Parity in Regularization Benefits: Milan Rana vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2022) Date of the Judgment: April 05, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 289 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J., Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can an employee be denied benefits that were previously granted to a similarly situated employee?
Supreme Court Grants Bail in GST Offence Case: Mohit Bathla vs. Central Goods and Service Tax (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Grant of bail in cases involving offences under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mohit Bathla vs. Central Goods and Service Tax, Division Panipat, CGST Commissionerate, Panchkula [Judgment Date]:
Supreme Court Upholds Reassessment Notice: M.R. Shah Logistics Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a reassessment notice under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be issued based on tangible material indicating income has escaped assessment, even if the assessee claims the income was declared under the Income Declaration Scheme (IDS) by another entity.
Supreme Court Upholds Reassessment Notice: M.R. Shah Logistics Case (2022) Read Post »
Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe and Anticipatory Bail in Multiple FIRs: Sanchit Alagh vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether to transfer investigation to CBI and grant anticipatory bail in multiple FIRs with similar allegations. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sanchit Alagh & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: March 28,
Supreme Court Clarifies Moratorium’s Impact on Section 138 NI Act Cases: Narinder Garg vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 March 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ. Can a corporate debtor facing insolvency proceedings be prosecuted under Section 138 of the
