S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Right to Purchase Under Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act: Musunuri Satyanarayana vs. Dr. Tirumala Indi Ra Devi & Ors. (27 October 2021)

/ Andhra Pradesh Tenancy (Andhra Area) Act, 1956, Andhra Pradesh Tenancy (Andhra Area) Act, 1956 with Section 14, Andhra Pradesh Tenancy (Andhra Area) Act, 1956 with Section 15, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Surrender of Tenancy, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Right to Purchase Under Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s right to purchase leased land under the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy (Andhra Area) Act can be denied based on a disputed claim of tenancy surrender. CASE TYPE: Tenancy Law Case Name: Musunuri Satyanarayana vs. Dr. Tirumala Indi Ra Devi […]

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Right to Purchase Under Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act: Musunuri Satyanarayana vs. Dr. Tirumala Indi Ra Devi & Ors. (27 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021)

/ Civil Law, Judges, Land Ownership Dispute, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code with Section 158(3)(1), Review Jurisdiction, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can exercise review jurisdiction to re-examine issues already decided on merits. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Ownership Dispute Case Name: Harwansh Kaur & Anr. vs. Special Area Development Authority (Counter Magnet), Gwalior & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 22 October

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Goutam Joardar vs. State of West Bengal (2021)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 27(3), Bela M. Trivedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Goutam Joardar vs. State of West Bengal (2021) Date of the Judgment: October 7, 2021 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Bela M. Trivedi Can a delay in recording witness statements be fatal to a prosecution’s case? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Goutam Joardar vs. State of West Bengal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “illicitly removed” under Kerala Forest Act: Bharath Booshan Aggarwal vs. State of Kerala (2021)

/ Burden of Proof, Criminal Law, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Kerala Forest Act, 1961, Kerala Forest Act, 1961 with Section 2(f), Kerala Forest Act, 1961 with Section 27(1)(d), Kerala Forest Act, 1961 with Section 69, Mens Rea, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court clarifies “illicitly removed” under Kerala Forest Act: Bharath Booshan Aggarwal vs. State of Kerala (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution must prove that the accused had knowledge of the illicit origin of forest produce for conviction under Section 27(1)(d) of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Bharath Booshan

Supreme Court clarifies “illicitly removed” under Kerala Forest Act: Bharath Booshan Aggarwal vs. State of Kerala (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Criminal Probe in Housing Scam: Shaikh Ansar Ahmad vs. State of Maharashtra (2021)

/ Criminal Law, Criminal Law with FIR, Criminal Procedure, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Misuse of PIL, Public Interest Litigation, Public Interest Litigation with Public Interest, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Criminal Probe in Housing Scam: Shaikh Ansar Ahmad vs. State of Maharashtra (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court’s order directing authorities to take steps based on inquiry reports, which led to the initiation of criminal proceedings, was justified, and whether the appellants, who were not parties to the original public interest

Supreme Court Upholds Criminal Probe in Housing Scam: Shaikh Ansar Ahmad vs. State of Maharashtra (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case for Convenience of Wife: Aarati Kumari vs. Sanjeev Kumar Singh (2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases

Date of the Judgment: October 04, 2021 Judges: Justice S. Ravindra Bhat Can a divorce case be transferred to a different court for the convenience of one of the parties? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a transfer petition filed by a wife seeking the transfer of her divorce case to

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case for Convenience of Wife: Aarati Kumari vs. Sanjeev Kumar Singh (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Shakun Srivastava vs. Prem Prakash Srivastava (2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 125, Family Law, Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 with Section 9, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Matrimonial Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Shakun Srivastava vs. Prem Prakash Srivastava (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial proceedings from one state to another. CASE TYPE: Family Law. Case Name: Shakun Srivastava vs. Prem Prakash Srivastava. [Judgment Date]: 04 October 2021 Date of the Judgment: 04 October 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: S. Ravindra Bhat, J.

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Shakun Srivastava vs. Prem Prakash Srivastava (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Mediation: Deepa Mohan Naik vs. Chandra Bhusan Pal (2021)

/ Alternative Dispute Resolution, Family Dispute Resolution, Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Dispute, Mediation, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Mediation: Deepa Mohan Naik vs. Chandra Bhusan Pal (2021) Date of the Judgment: October 4, 2021 Citation: Not Available in the provided document. Judges: Justice S. Ravindra Bhat Can a matrimonial dispute be transferred to a different state to facilitate mediation? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Mediation: Deepa Mohan Naik vs. Chandra Bhusan Pal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case from Delhi to Udaipur: Bagdi Bai vs. Laxman (2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case: Bagdi Bai vs. Laxman (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a divorce petition can be transferred from one state to another based on the convenience of the parties. CASE TYPE: Family Law Case Name: Bagdi Bai @ Bindu vs. Laxman Judgment Date: 04 October 2021 Date of the Judgment: 04 October 2021

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case from Delhi to Udaipur: Bagdi Bai vs. Laxman (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Online Mediation in Matrimonial Dispute: Parul Jaiswal vs. Avinash Jaiswal (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Family Courts Act, Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Dispute, Online Mediation, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Directs Online Mediation in Matrimonial Dispute: Parul Jaiswal vs. Avinash Jaiswal (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a divorce petition can be transferred to another court and whether online mediation can be ordered in matrimonial disputes. CASE TYPE: Family Law Case Name: Parul Jaiswal vs. Avinash Jaiswal & Anr. [Judgment Date]: October 4, 2021 Date

Supreme Court Directs Online Mediation in Matrimonial Dispute: Parul Jaiswal vs. Avinash Jaiswal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition and Special Leave Petition in Matrimonial Dispute (04 October 2021)

/ Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, S. Ravindra Bhat, Settlement, Special Leave Petition, Transfer Petition, Withdrawal of Cases

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition and Special Leave Petition in Matrimonial Dispute Date of the Judgment: 04 October 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can parties resolve their disputes and withdraw proceedings in the Supreme Court? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a recent case where the parties had settled their

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition and Special Leave Petition in Matrimonial Dispute (04 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Husband to Pay Wife’s Travel Expenses in Divorce Case: Ruchika Swain vs. Sandeep Kumar Mallick (2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Dispute, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Directs Husband to Pay Wife’s Travel Expenses in Divorce Case: Ruchika Swain vs. Sandeep Kumar Mallick (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of divorce petition and payment of travel expenses. CASE TYPE: Family Law – Transfer Petition Case Name: Ruchika Swain vs. Sandeep Kumar Mallick [Judgment Date]: October 4, 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Directs Husband to Pay Wife’s Travel Expenses in Divorce Case: Ruchika Swain vs. Sandeep Kumar Mallick (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top