Sandeep Mehta

Supreme Court Transfers Custodial Death Case to CBI, Emphasizes Witness Protection: Hansura Bai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 15, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 711 Judges: Vikram Nath J., Sandeep Mehta J. When a person dies in police custody, who should investigate the matter to ensure justice? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Hansura Bai & Anr. vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh […]

Supreme Court Transfers Custodial Death Case to CBI, Emphasizes Witness Protection: Hansura Bai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in rape and murder case due to flawed investigation: Ramkirat Munilal Goud vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) INSC 702 (May 07, 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 07, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 702 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sanjay Karol, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. In a shocking turn of events, the Supreme Court of India has overturned the conviction of an accused in a rape and murder case, citing a “shabby and perfunctory investigation.” The case, Ramkirat

Supreme Court overturns conviction in rape and murder case due to flawed investigation: Ramkirat Munilal Goud vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) INSC 702 (May 07, 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in cheque bounce case, invoking Article 142: Rajendra Anant Varik vs. Govind B. Prabhugaonkar (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 06, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 633 Judges: Vikram Nath, J. and Sandeep Mehta, J. Can the Supreme Court use its powers to provide complete justice when an accused has already paid the cheque amount in a case involving Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? The Supreme Court addressed

Supreme Court acquits accused in cheque bounce case, invoking Article 142: Rajendra Anant Varik vs. Govind B. Prabhugaonkar (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Shakuntla Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 25, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 581 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sanjay Karol, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. When does the relentless torment for dowry cross the line into abetment of suicide? The Supreme Court of India recently examined this question in Shakuntla Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, a case

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Shakuntla Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2025)

Date of the Judgment: April 15, 2025 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a High Court decision be overturned if it misinterprets evidence and disregards findings of lower courts? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving a property dispute. The court found that the High Court had

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Delay and Lack of Inducement: G.V. Adhimoolam & Ors. vs. The Inspector of Police & Anr. (2025)

Date of the Judgment: April 04, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 681 Judges: Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta Can a criminal case be pursued based on a stale claim of cheating where the initial investment was suggested by a close relative, and there’s a significant delay in reporting the alleged fraud? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Delay and Lack of Inducement: G.V. Adhimoolam & Ors. vs. The Inspector of Police & Anr. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies sentencing under IPC and POCSO Act in father-daughter rape case: Gyanendra Singh vs. State of U.P. (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 07, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 335 Judges: Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta Can a person be sentenced under both the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for the same crime? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court clarifies sentencing under IPC and POCSO Act in father-daughter rape case: Gyanendra Singh vs. State of U.P. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rape Conviction Based on Sole Testimony of Victim: Lok Mal @ Loku vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025) INSC 344 (March 7, 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 344 Judges: Sandeep Mehta, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. In a significant judgment concerning sexual offenses, the Supreme Court of India addressed whether a conviction for rape can be sustained based solely on the testimony of the victim. The case of Lok Mal @

Supreme Court Upholds Rape Conviction Based on Sole Testimony of Victim: Lok Mal @ Loku vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025) INSC 344 (March 7, 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of In-Laws in Dowry Death Case: Shabeen Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 307)

Date of the Judgment: March 03, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 307 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can the High Court grant bail in a dowry death case based on superficial parameters? The Supreme Court, in Shabeen Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, addressed this critical question. The court overturned the Allahabad High Court’s

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of In-Laws in Dowry Death Case: Shabeen Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 307) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in forgery case due to lack of primary evidence: C. Kamalakkannan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 03, 2025 Judges: Vikram Nath, J. and Sandeep Mehta, J. In a case highlighting the critical importance of evidence in criminal trials, the Supreme Court of India addressed the question of whether a conviction can be sustained when primary evidence is lacking. The case revolved around allegations of forgery

Supreme Court acquits accused in forgery case due to lack of primary evidence: C. Kamalakkannan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procurement policy for MSMEs: Lifecare Innovations vs. Union of India (25 February 2025)

Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 269 Judges: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can the government’s procurement policy for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) be enforced, and what are the obligations of government bodies in promoting these enterprises? The Supreme Court of India addressed these critical questions in

Supreme Court clarifies procurement policy for MSMEs: Lifecare Innovations vs. Union of India (25 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Quashes Extradition Order: Vishal Shah vs. Monali Shah Gupta (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 20, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 254 Judges: Pankaj Mithal, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a marriage be dissolved if it has irretrievably broken down, even if one party opposes it? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Vishal Shah vs. Monali Shah Gupta,

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Quashes Extradition Order: Vishal Shah vs. Monali Shah Gupta (2025) Read Post »

Scroll to Top