Sandeep Mehta

Supreme Court quashes appointments made under flawed 2010 advertisement: Amrit Yadav vs. State of Jharkhand (2025) INSC 176 (February 10, 2025)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Public Employment, Sandeep Mehta, Service Law

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 10, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 176 Judges: Pankaj Mithal, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Was the recruitment process for Class IV employees in Palamu, Jharkhand, fair and transparent? The Supreme Court of India recently examined this question in a case involving appointments made based on an advertisement from 2010. The […]

Supreme Court quashes appointments made under flawed 2010 advertisement: Amrit Yadav vs. State of Jharkhand (2025) INSC 176 (February 10, 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Chargesheet for Offences under Sections 269, 270, and 504 IPC in Workplace Dispute: B.V. Ram Kumar vs. State of Telangana (2025)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code with Section 269, Indian Penal Code with Section 270, Indian Penal Code with Section 504, Judges, Sandeep Mehta, Sanjiv Khanna

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 10, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 194 Judges: Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Sandeep Mehta Can a superior’s reprimand in the workplace amount to criminal intimidation? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of B.V. Ram Kumar vs. State of Telangana, where an appeal was filed against

Supreme Court Quashes Chargesheet for Offences under Sections 269, 270, and 504 IPC in Workplace Dispute: B.V. Ram Kumar vs. State of Telangana (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles arbitration involving stockbroker, husband, and wife, clarifying jurisdiction and liability: AC Chokshi Share Broker vs. Jatin Pratap Desai (2025) INSC 174 (10 February 2025)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Bombay Stock Exchange Bye-Laws, 1957, Bombay Stock Exchange Bye-Laws, 1957 with Bye-law 248(a), Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sandeep Mehta

Date of the Judgment: 10 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 174 Judges: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. When a stockbroker initiates arbitration to recover losses from a client’s account, can the client’s spouse be held jointly liable for the debt? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving

Supreme Court settles arbitration involving stockbroker, husband, and wife, clarifying jurisdiction and liability: AC Chokshi Share Broker vs. Jatin Pratap Desai (2025) INSC 174 (10 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bribery Case: Airport Authority of India vs. Pradip Kumar Banerjee (2025)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Sandeep Mehta

Date of the Judgment: February 04, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 149 Judges: J.K. Maheshwari, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can an employee’s dismissal be upheld even after acquittal in a criminal case? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case involving an employee of the Airport Authority of India (AAI) who was

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bribery Case: Airport Authority of India vs. Pradip Kumar Banerjee (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies stamp duty refund timelines in property cancellation: Harshit Harish Jain & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2025) INSC 104

/ Judges, Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 with Section 48(1), Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 47, Sandeep Mehta, Sanjay Karol, Stamp Duty Refund, Vikram Nath

Date of the Judgment: January 24, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 104 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sanjay Karol, J., and Sandeep Mehta, J. When does the right to claim a stamp duty refund arise when a property deal is cancelled? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, focusing on whether the date of execution

Supreme Court clarifies stamp duty refund timelines in property cancellation: Harshit Harish Jain & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2025) INSC 104 Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Bombay High Court Order on Land Encroachment: Vimal Babu Dhumadiya vs. State of Maharashtra (2025)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Sandeep Mehta, Sanjay Karol, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Bombay High Court Order on Land Encroachment: Vimal Babu Dhumadiya vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can declare a High Court judgment illegal under Article 32 of the Constitution, and what remedies are available to parties not heard in the original proceedings. CASE TYPE: Constitutional

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Bombay High Court Order on Land Encroachment: Vimal Babu Dhumadiya vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, B.R. Gavai, Bela M. Trivedi, Compassionate Appointment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 18(3), Labour Law with Section 2(p), M.R. Shah, Pankaj Mithal, R. Banumathi, Sandeep Mehta, Service Law, T.S. Thakur

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi When a person dies while in service, can their dependent automatically get a job? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top