Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court overturns High Court conviction based on extra-judicial confession: Nikhil Chandra Mondal vs. State of West Bengal (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Evidence Act, 1872, Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Extra-judicial Confessions, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court overturns High Court conviction based on extra-judicial confession: Nikhil Chandra Mondal vs. State of West Bengal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction can be solely based on extra-judicial confession without corroborating evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: Nikhil Chandra Mondal vs. State of West Bengal Judgment Date: March 3, 2023 Date of […]

Supreme Court overturns High Court conviction based on extra-judicial confession: Nikhil Chandra Mondal vs. State of West Bengal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land and Building Department vs. Manish Sethi (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land and Building Department vs. Manish Sethi (2023) Date of the Judgment: February 17, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 124 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J., and Sanjay Karol, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the compensation

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land and Building Department vs. Manish Sethi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property development dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Civil Procedure, Development Agreements, Judges, M. R. Shah, Property Law, Sanjay Karol, Special Leave Petitions

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property development dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Leave Petition can be withdrawn due to subsequent developments in a property development dispute. CASE TYPE: Property Development/Civil Case Name: S.M. Pasha & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Judgment Date: 17

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property development dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Civil Procedure, Development Agreement, Judges, M. R. Shah, Property Dispute, Property Law, Sanjay Karol, Special Leave Petition, Withdrawal of Petition

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Leave Petition can be withdrawn unconditionally due to subsequent developments in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Property Law. Case Name: S.M. Pasha & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Judgment Date]: February 17,

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishan Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishan Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishan Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh & Ors. (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Dhannu (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Sanjay Karol, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Dhannu (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is not taken or compensation is not paid, and whether a person who is

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Dhannu (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Dhannu (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Dhannu (2023) Date of the Judgment: February 17, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 942 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) No. 3116 of 2023) (@ Diary No. 28432 of 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J., Sanjay Karol, J. Can

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Dhannu (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Delhi Development Authority vs. MGS (India) Private Limited (2023) INSC 123

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court Settles Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Delhi Development Authority vs. MGS (India) Private Limited (2023) INSC 123 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the right to challenge the lapsing of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land

Supreme Court settles Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Delhi Development Authority vs. MGS (India) Private Limited (2023) INSC 123 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Jagan Singh (2023) – Land Acquisition Act

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Sanjay Karol

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Jagan Singh (2023) – Land Acquisition Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid after possession is taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 17 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 17 February

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Jagan Singh (2023) – Land Acquisition Act Read Post »

Scroll to Top