Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Rights, Emphasizing Due Process in Land Ceiling Cases: Bajranga vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Rights: Bajranga vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) Date of the Judgment: January 19, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 19 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a landowner be deprived of their land without proper adherence to legal procedures? This question was at the heart of […]

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Rights, Emphasizing Due Process in Land Ceiling Cases: Bajranga vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Rights, Rejects Disputed Sale Agreement: Venigalla Koteswaramma vs. Malempati Suryamba (2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Rights, Rejects Disputed Sale Agreement: Venigalla Koteswaramma vs. Malempati Suryamba (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a sale agreement and its impact on partition of property. CASE TYPE: Civil (Partition) Case Name: Venigalla Koteswaramma vs. Malempati Suryamba & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 19 January 2021 Date of the Judgment: 19 January 2021 Citation:

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Rights, Rejects Disputed Sale Agreement: Venigalla Koteswaramma vs. Malempati Suryamba (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Probation Despite Minimum Sentence: Lakhvir Singh vs. State of Punjab (2021)

Supreme Court Allows Probation Despite Minimum Sentence: Lakhvir Singh vs. State of Punjab (2021) Date of the Judgment: January 19, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 14 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can young offenders, who have committed a serious crime, be given the benefit of probation, even if the law prescribes a minimum

Supreme Court Allows Probation Despite Minimum Sentence: Lakhvir Singh vs. State of Punjab (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs fresh hearing for alleged fraud in commodity exchange case (27 November 2020)

Supreme Court directs fresh hearing for alleged fraud in commodity exchange case (27 November 2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the principles of natural justice were violated in proceedings against a commodity exchange and its related parties for alleged fraud. CASE TYPE: Commodities and Securities Law Case Name: Indian Commodity Exchange Limited vs. Neptune Overseas Limited &

Supreme Court directs fresh hearing for alleged fraud in commodity exchange case (27 November 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Matrimonial Homicide Case: Jayantilal Verma vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Matrimonial Homicide Case: Jayantilal Verma vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether circumstantial evidence and the lack of explanation from the accused under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, are sufficient to uphold a conviction for murder in a domestic setting. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Jayantilal

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Matrimonial Homicide Case: Jayantilal Verma vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to weak evidence: Chunthuram vs. State of Chhattisgarh (29 October 2020)

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to weak evidence: Chunthuram vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2020) Date of the Judgment: 29 October 2020 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Krishna Murari, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a conviction for murder be sustained when the evidence is weak and circumstantial? The

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to weak evidence: Chunthuram vs. State of Chhattisgarh (29 October 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order Due to Delayed Reasons: Balaji Baliram Mupade vs. State of Maharashtra (29 October 2020)

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order Due to Delayed Reasons: Balaji Baliram Mupade vs. State of Maharashtra (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court order can be set aside if the reasons for the order are provided after an unreasonable delay. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. Case Name: Balaji Baliram Mupade & Anr. vs. The State

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order Due to Delayed Reasons: Balaji Baliram Mupade vs. State of Maharashtra (29 October 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses Lease Extension for Obstructed Mining Periods, Orders Refund: Dharmendra Kumar Singh vs. State of UP (28 October 2020)

Supreme Court Refuses Lease Extension for Obstructed Mining Periods, Orders Refund: Dharmendra Kumar Singh vs. State of UP (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mining leases should be extended for the period during which operations were halted due to court orders, or if a refund of lease amounts is sufficient. CASE TYPE: Mining Law, Environmental Law Case

Supreme Court Refuses Lease Extension for Obstructed Mining Periods, Orders Refund: Dharmendra Kumar Singh vs. State of UP (28 October 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Delayed Appeal, Imposes Costs: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal (2020)

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Delayed Appeal, Imposes Costs: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Condonation of delay in filing a Special Leave Petition by a government entity. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. vs. Bherulal Judgment Date: 15 October 2020 Date of the

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Delayed Appeal, Imposes Costs: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles limitation for pre-emption rights under Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act: Raghunath vs. Radha Mohan (2020)

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for pre-emption rights under Rajasthan Act: Raghunath vs. Radha Mohan (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the limitation period for exercising the right of pre-emption under the Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966, commences from the first sale after the Act came into force or from each subsequent sale. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property

Supreme Court settles limitation for pre-emption rights under Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act: Raghunath vs. Radha Mohan (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles M.Ed. Degree as eligible qualification for Assistant Professor in Education: Anand Yadav & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2020) INSC 581 (12 October 2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies M.Ed. Degree Eligibility for Assistant Professor in Education Date of the Judgment: 12 October 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 581 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Aniruddha Bose, J., and Krishna Murari, J. Can a Master of Education (M.Ed.) degree be considered equivalent to a Master of Arts (M.A.) in Education for the purpose

Supreme Court settles M.Ed. Degree as eligible qualification for Assistant Professor in Education: Anand Yadav & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2020) INSC 581 (12 October 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony: Amar Singh vs. State (2020) INSC 469

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony: Amar Singh vs. State (2020) INSC 469 LEGAL ISSUE: Reliability of a single eyewitness testimony in a criminal trial. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Amar Singh vs. The State (NCT of Delhi) Judgment Date: 12 October 2020 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony: Amar Singh vs. State (2020) INSC 469 Read Post »

Scroll to Top