Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Declares Stringent Bail Conditions Under PMLA Unconstitutional: Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India (23 November 2017)

Can bail be denied based on the nature of a related offense, rather than the primary offense itself? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India. This case challenged the constitutional validity of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, which imposed […]

Supreme Court Declares Stringent Bail Conditions Under PMLA Unconstitutional: Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India (23 November 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Entry Tax set-off for Oil Companies in Bihar: Indian Oil Corporation vs. State of Bihar (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether oil companies are eligible for a set-off of Value Added Tax (VAT) against Entry Tax paid on petroleum products when the VAT is levied at the point of sale by other oil marketing companies (OMCs). CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs. State of Bihar & Anr. Judgment

Supreme Court clarifies Entry Tax set-off for Oil Companies in Bihar: Indian Oil Corporation vs. State of Bihar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Service Tax Liability in Lease Agreements: Union of India vs. Bengal Shrachi Housing (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the party liable for service tax under a lease agreement. CASE TYPE: Service Tax/Lease Agreement Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Bengal Shrachi Housing Development Limited & Anr. Judgment Date: 7 November 2017 Date of the Judgment: 7 November 2017 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., Sanjay

Supreme Court Clarifies Service Tax Liability in Lease Agreements: Union of India vs. Bengal Shrachi Housing (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Permanent Establishment (PE) norms in India-US DTAA: Assistant Director of Income Tax vs. E-Funds IT Solution Inc. (24 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a foreign company has a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, making it liable for taxation in India under the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). CASE TYPE: International Taxation Case Name: Assistant Director of Income Tax-I, New Delhi vs. M/s E-Funds IT Solution Inc. Judgment Date: 24 October 2017 Date of the

Supreme Court clarifies Permanent Establishment (PE) norms in India-US DTAA: Assistant Director of Income Tax vs. E-Funds IT Solution Inc. (24 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies District Mineral Foundation contributions in mining law: Federation of Indian Mineral Industries vs. Union of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the establishment and funding of District Mineral Foundations (DMFs) under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and whether contributions to these funds could be applied retrospectively. CASE TYPE: This case falls under the ambit of mining and mineral law, specifically concerning the financial obligations

Supreme Court clarifies District Mineral Foundation contributions in mining law: Federation of Indian Mineral Industries vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies coal cost calculation in Power Purchase Agreement: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) concerning the calculation of energy charges, specifically regarding the cost of coal. CASE TYPE: Contractual Dispute/Electricity Law. Case Name: Nabha Power Limited (NPL) vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) & Anr. Judgment Date: 05 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 05 October 2017 Citation: 2017

Supreme Court clarifies coal cost calculation in Power Purchase Agreement: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insurance Claim Dispute: Anu Texchem Products vs. New India Assurance (2017)

Can a court reconsider its own judgment? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question when M/s Anu Texchem Products (P) Ltd sought a review of a previous order. This case involves a dispute over an insurance claim. The Supreme Court, composed of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, ultimately dismissed the

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insurance Claim Dispute: Anu Texchem Products vs. New India Assurance (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Tax Implications of Unregistered Joint Development Agreements: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Balbir Singh Maini (2017) INSC 859 (04 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an unregistered Joint Development Agreement (JDA) constitutes a “transfer” under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, making it liable for capital gains tax. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Balbir Singh Maini [Judgment Date]: 04 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 04 October

Supreme Court Clarifies Tax Implications of Unregistered Joint Development Agreements: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Balbir Singh Maini (2017) INSC 859 (04 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows simultaneous SARFAESI and arbitration proceedings in loan recovery: M.D. Frozen Foods Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs Hero Fincorp Ltd. (21 September 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether arbitration and SARFAESI proceedings can occur simultaneously and if the SARFAESI Act applies to debts existing before the Act’s application to a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC). CASE TYPE: Loan Recovery/Banking Law Case Name: M.D. Frozen Foods Exports Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Hero Fincorp Ltd. Judgment Date: 21 September 2017 Can a

Supreme Court allows simultaneous SARFAESI and arbitration proceedings in loan recovery: M.D. Frozen Foods Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs Hero Fincorp Ltd. (21 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Dispute” Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for Operational Debts: Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited (2017)

Can a mere allegation of breach of contract constitute a “dispute” to halt insolvency proceedings? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case concerning operational debts under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. This judgment clarifies what constitutes a valid dispute that can prevent the initiation of insolvency proceedings by operational

Supreme Court Clarifies “Dispute” Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for Operational Debts: Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited (2017) Read Post »

Tax Exemption on Tobacco Products: Supreme Court Refers Conflict to Larger Bench in Shanti Fragrances vs. Union of India (21 September 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a specific entry in a tax rate schedule can override a general exemption for the same goods. CASE TYPE: Tax Law – Sales Tax Case Name: M/S Shanti Fragrances vs. Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date: 21 September 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21 September 2017 Citation: Not available in

Tax Exemption on Tobacco Products: Supreme Court Refers Conflict to Larger Bench in Shanti Fragrances vs. Union of India (21 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies maritime claims and vessel ownership in Chrisomar Corporation vs. MJR Steels (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of ownership of a vessel for enforcing maritime claims and the effect of settlement agreements on original contracts. CASE TYPE: Admiralty Law Case Name: Chrisomar Corporation vs. MJR Steels Private Limited & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 14 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 14 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 776 Judges: R.F. Nariman,

Supreme Court clarifies maritime claims and vessel ownership in Chrisomar Corporation vs. MJR Steels (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top