Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder and Robbery Case: Dakkata Balaram Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused in a case of double murder and robbery. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Dakkata Balaram Reddy […]
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case: Dakkata Balaram Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the circumstantial evidence presented was sufficient to uphold the conviction of the accused for murder, robbery, and house trespass. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Dakkata Balaram Reddy & Anr. vs. State of Andhra Pradesh &
Supreme Court on Compound Interest in Real Estate Disputes: Suneja Towers vs. Anita Merchant (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether consumer courts can award compound interest on refunds in real estate disputes. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case Name: M/S Suneja Towers Private Limited & Anr. vs. Anita Merchant Judgment Date: 18 April 2023 Introduction Date of the
Supreme Court quashes debarment and penalty on transformer supplier: Isolators and Isolators vs. Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Vitran Company (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a supplier can be debarred and penalized for non-supply of goods when the purchasing company deferred the delivery. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Public Procurement Case Name: Isolators and Isolators Through Its Proprietor Mrs.
Supreme Court Quashes Debarment and Penalty for Transformer Supplier: Isolators and Isolators vs. Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a supplier can be debarred and penalized without proper notice and consideration of circumstances. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Public Procurement. Case Name: Isolators and Isolators Through Its Proprietor Mrs. Sandhya Mishra vs.
Supreme Court Quashes Discretionary Allotment of Land: Improvement Trust, Ropar vs. Shashi Bala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land allotment made under a discretionary quota can be upheld if the discretionary quota itself is deemed unconstitutional. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Allotment Case Name: Improvement Trust, Ropar vs. Shashi Bala & Anr. Judgment Date:
Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Lease Violation: Yuvraj vs. Janardan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s assignment of business within a leased premise constitutes a breach of lease conditions, warranting eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Tenancy Dispute Case Name: Yuvraj @ Munna Pralhad
Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Lease Violation: Yuvraj vs. Janardan (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court Clarifies Fee Regulation for Minority Institutions in Madhya Pradesh LEGAL ISSUE: Whether minority educational institutions in Madhya Pradesh are required to have their fee structures regulated by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Icon Education Society vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Judgment Date: 17 March
Supreme Court Clarifies Fee Regulation for Minority Institutions in Madhya Pradesh LEGAL ISSUE: Whether minority educational institutions in Madhya Pradesh are required to have their fees fixed by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee (AFRC). CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Icon Education Society vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Judgment Date: 17 March
Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can transfer cheque dishonor cases under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 despite the specific jurisdiction outlined in Section 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. CASE TYPE: Criminal, Negotiable Instruments Act Case Name:
Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases for Consolidated Trial LEGAL ISSUE: Whether cases related to cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be transferred to a different court for a consolidated trial, despite the jurisdictional provisions of Section 142 of the same Act. CASE TYPE: Criminal, Negotiable Instruments Act Case
Supreme Court Limits Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can direct re-evaluation of answer sheets when the university’s statute does not provide for it. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Dr. B R Ambedkar University, Agra vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta &
