Sanjay Kumar

Supreme Court Clarifies Fee Regulation for Minority Institutions in Madhya Pradesh: Icon Education Society vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) INSC 256

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 30(1), Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Fee Regulation, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha Adhiniyam, 2007, Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha Adhiniyam, 2007 with Section 4, Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha Adhiniyam, 2007 with Section 9, Minority Institutions, Sanjay Kumar

Supreme Court Clarifies Fee Regulation for Minority Institutions in Madhya Pradesh LEGAL ISSUE: Whether minority educational institutions in Madhya Pradesh are required to have their fees fixed by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee (AFRC). CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Icon Education Society vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Judgment Date: 17 March […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Fee Regulation for Minority Institutions in Madhya Pradesh: Icon Education Society vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) INSC 256 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies fee regulation for minority institutions in Madhya Pradesh: Icon Education Society vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) INSC 237 (17 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 30(1), Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Education Law with Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007, Fee Regulation, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Sanjay Kumar

Supreme Court Clarifies Fee Regulation for Minority Institutions in Madhya Pradesh LEGAL ISSUE: Whether minority educational institutions in Madhya Pradesh are required to have their fee structures regulated by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Icon Education Society vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Judgment Date: 17 March

Supreme Court clarifies fee regulation for minority institutions in Madhya Pradesh: Icon Education Society vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) INSC 237 (17 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases for Consolidated Trial: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (21 February 2023)

/ Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 406, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 142, Sanjay Kumar, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases for Consolidated Trial LEGAL ISSUE: Whether cases related to cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be transferred to a different court for a consolidated trial, despite the jurisdictional provisions of Section 142 of the same Act. CASE TYPE: Criminal, Negotiable Instruments Act Case

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases for Consolidated Trial: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (21 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (21 February 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 406, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 142, Sanjay Kumar, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can transfer cheque dishonor cases under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 despite the specific jurisdiction outlined in Section 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. CASE TYPE: Criminal, Negotiable Instruments Act Case Name:

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (21 February 2023) Read Post »

Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Supreme Court clarifies position in Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023)

/ Administrative Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Examination and Evaluation, Judges, Judicial Review, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Sanjay Kumar, University Regulations, Writ of Mandamus

Supreme Court on Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 116 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Can a High Court order re-evaluation of answer sheets when the university’s statutes do

Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Supreme Court clarifies position in Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023)

/ Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Judges, Judicial Review of Academic Matters, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Sanjay Kumar, University Regulations

Supreme Court Limits Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can direct re-evaluation of answer sheets when the university’s statute does not provide for it. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Dr. B R Ambedkar University, Agra vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta &

Supreme Court Limits Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top