Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court rules captive power users exempt from additional surcharge: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. JSW Steel Limited & Ors. (10 December 2021)

/ Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 2(15), Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 42, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 9, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Judgement on Additional Surcharge for Captive Power Users LEGAL ISSUE: Whether captive power consumers are liable to pay additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law Case Name: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. JSW Steel Limited & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 December 2021 Introduction […]

Supreme Court rules captive power users exempt from additional surcharge: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. JSW Steel Limited & Ors. (10 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Contempt Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Sudhir Kumar Singh vs. Jaishri (2021)

/ Contempt of Court, Contempt Petition, Divorce Law, Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Contempt Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Sudhir Kumar Singh vs. Jaishri (2021) Date of the Judgment: December 09, 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Sanjiv Khanna Can a contempt petition be withdrawn if the terms of an agreement are not met in a matrimonial dispute? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Contempt Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Sudhir Kumar Singh vs. Jaishri (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Dispute to Delhi: Pranjal Komal Patil vs. Komal Dhansingh Patil (2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 139A, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Dispute to Delhi: Pranjal Komal Patil vs. Komal Dhansingh Patil (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial proceedings. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Pranjal Komal Patil vs. Komal Dhansingh Patil [Judgment Date]: December 09, 2021 Date of the Judgment: December 09, 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Sanjiv Khanna Can a

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Dispute to Delhi: Pranjal Komal Patil vs. Komal Dhansingh Patil (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Bail Granted by High Court in MCOCA Case: State of Maharashtra vs. Pankaj Jagshi Gangar (2021) INSC 725

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 384, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 386, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 387, Judges, M. R. Shah, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 with Section 21(4), Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 with Section 23(1)(a), Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Quashes Bail in MCOCA Case: State of Maharashtra vs. Pankaj Jagshi Gangar (2021) INSC 725 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in granting bail to an accused under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) by way of interim relief while considering a writ petition challenging the vires of certain

Supreme Court Quashes Bail Granted by High Court in MCOCA Case: State of Maharashtra vs. Pankaj Jagshi Gangar (2021) INSC 725 Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Implementation of Resolution Plan in Amtek Auto Insolvency Case (01 December 2021)

/ Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 12, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 74(3), Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Orders Implementation of Resolution Plan in Amtek Auto Insolvency Case LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the implementation of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), specifically when a successful resolution applicant fails to adhere to the approved plan. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Committee of

Supreme Court Orders Implementation of Resolution Plan in Amtek Auto Insolvency Case (01 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Rape Case Based on Sole Testimony of Victim: Phool Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Rape Case Based on Sole Testimony of Victim: Phool Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Can a conviction for rape be upheld based solely on the testimony of the victim, even without corroborating medical evidence? CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Phool Singh vs. The State of

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Rape Case Based on Sole Testimony of Victim: Phool Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Convictions in Caste-Based Honor Killing Case: Hari & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (26 November 2021)

/ B.R. Gavai, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Offences Against Human Body, Sanjiv Khanna, Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(3)(10)

Supreme Court Upholds Convictions in Caste-Based Honor Killing Case: Hari & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Vicarious liability of members of an unlawful assembly in cases of caste-based violence and honor killings. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Caste Discrimination, Honor Killing Case Name: Hari & Anr. vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court Upholds Convictions in Caste-Based Honor Killing Case: Hari & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (26 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Arbitration Award in Saluja Construction vs. Northern Coalfields Dispute (25 November 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 20, Arbitration Law with Section 8, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Arbitration Award in Saluja Construction vs. Northern Coalfields Dispute (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator can expand the scope of arbitration to include disputes beyond the specific contract referenced in the arbitration agreement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Saluja Construction Company vs. Northern Coalfields Limited [Judgment Date]: 25 November 2021

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Arbitration Award in Saluja Construction vs. Northern Coalfields Dispute (25 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles applicability of Limitation Act to appeals under Section 30 of the Recovery of Debts Act: Avneesh Chandan Gadgil vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce (24 November 2021)

/ Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29(2), Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, M.R. Shah, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 with Section 30, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation Act Applicability in Debt Recovery Appeals Date of the Judgment: 24 November 2021 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Sanjiv Khanna, J. Citation: Avneesh Chandan Gadgil & Anr. vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 6898 of 2021, decided on 24 November 2021 Can the delay in filing an

Supreme Court settles applicability of Limitation Act to appeals under Section 30 of the Recovery of Debts Act: Avneesh Chandan Gadgil vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce (24 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court on Urban Land Ceiling Act: Possession Key to Repeal Benefit

/ Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 with Section 10(3), Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 with Section 10(5), Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 with Section 20(1), Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 with Section 3, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 with Section 4

Supreme Court on Urban Land Ceiling Act: Possession Key to Repeal Benefit LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the repeal of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, automatically restores land to owners if compensation was not paid, even if possession was taken by the government. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Acquisition and Urban Land Ceiling

Supreme Court on Urban Land Ceiling Act: Possession Key to Repeal Benefit Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Anil Kumar Soti vs. State of U.P. (23 November 2021)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M. R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Anil Kumar Soti vs. State of U.P. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Anil Kumar Soti & Ors. vs. State of U.P. through Collector Bijnore (U.P.). Judgment Date: 23 November 2021 Introduction

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Anil Kumar Soti vs. State of U.P. (23 November 2021) Read Post »

Arbitration Process: Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Award in M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (18 November 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 19, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Judges, M.R. Shah, Natural Justice, Sanjiv Khanna, Violation of Natural Justice

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Contract Dispute: M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral award should be set aside for violating principles of natural justice and not providing sufficient opportunity to present a case. CASE TYPE: Arbitration. Case Name: M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union

Arbitration Process: Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Award in M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (18 November 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top