Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Refuses Clarification on Reassessment Notices: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (12 May 2023)

/ Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 148, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 150(2), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 153A, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Refuses Clarification on Reassessment Notices: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 12 May 2023 The Supreme Court of India, in this case, declined to entertain a miscellaneous application filed by the Revenue seeking clarification on the waiver of limitation for reassessment notices under Section […]

Supreme Court Refuses Clarification on Reassessment Notices: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (12 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses Clarification on Income Tax Reassessment: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (2023)

/ Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 148, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 150(2), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 153A, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Refuses Clarification on Income Tax Reassessment: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should clarify the applicability of Section 150(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding the waiver of limitation for reassessment notices under Section 148, especially in cases related to assessments

Supreme Court Refuses Clarification on Income Tax Reassessment: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Arbitration in Complex Multi-Party Dispute: Gujarat Composite Ltd. vs. A Infrastructure Ltd. (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 8, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Arbitration in Complex Multi-Party Dispute: Gujarat Composite Ltd. vs. A Infrastructure Ltd. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute involving multiple parties and agreements, some of which lack arbitration clauses, can be referred to arbitration based on a clause in one of the agreements. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Gujarat

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Arbitration in Complex Multi-Party Dispute: Gujarat Composite Ltd. vs. A Infrastructure Ltd. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Arbitrability of Disputes Involving Multiple Agreements: Gujarat Composite Ltd. vs. A Infrastructure Ltd. (2023)

/ Arbitrability of Disputes, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 8, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Arbitrability of Disputes Involving Multiple Agreements: Gujarat Composite Ltd. vs. A Infrastructure Ltd. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether disputes arising from a primary agreement containing an arbitration clause can be referred to arbitration when subsequent agreements, lacking such a clause and involving additional parties, are inextricably linked to the dispute. CASE TYPE: Arbitration

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Arbitrability of Disputes Involving Multiple Agreements: Gujarat Composite Ltd. vs. A Infrastructure Ltd. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits State Residency Quota in B.Ed Admissions: Veena Vadini Teachers Training Institute vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (28 April 2023)

/ Admission Policy, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Reservation Policy, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Limits State Residency Quota in B.Ed Admissions: Veena Vadini Teachers Training Institute vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a state government can reserve seats for residents in B.Ed courses and, if so, what is the permissible extent of such reservation. CASE TYPE: Education Law. Case Name: Veena Vadini Teachers Training

Supreme Court Limits State Residency Quota in B.Ed Admissions: Veena Vadini Teachers Training Institute vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Divorce Citing Cruelty from Irretrievable Breakdown: Rakesh Raman vs. Kavita (26 April 2023)

/ Cruelty, Divorce, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13(1)(ia), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 406, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, J. B. Pardiwala, Judges, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Grants Divorce Citing Cruelty from Irretrievable Breakdown: Rakesh Raman vs. Kavita (26 April 2023) Date of the Judgment: 26 April 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 2012 of 2013 Judges: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J., J. B. Pardiwala, J. (authored by Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Can a marriage be dissolved if it has irretrievably broken down, even

Supreme Court Grants Divorce Citing Cruelty from Irretrievable Breakdown: Rakesh Raman vs. Kavita (26 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Divorce Citing Cruelty in Irretrievably Broken Marriage: Rakesh Raman vs. Kavita (2023)

/ Cruelty, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code with Section 406, Indian Penal Code with Section 498A, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Grants Divorce Citing Cruelty in Irretrievably Broken Marriage: Rakesh Raman vs. Kavita (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a marriage can be dissolved on the grounds of cruelty when the relationship has irretrievably broken down, marked by long separation and multiple litigations. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law Case Name: Shri Rakesh Raman vs. Smt. Kavita [Judgment

Supreme Court Grants Divorce Citing Cruelty in Irretrievably Broken Marriage: Rakesh Raman vs. Kavita (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies scope of assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act in search cases (24 April 2023)

/ Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 132, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 147, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 153A, Judges, M.R. Shah, Reassessment, Search and Seizure, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Tax Assessment

Supreme Court Clarifies Assessment Scope Under Section 153A of Income Tax Act Date of the Judgment: 24 April 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 379 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Can tax authorities reassess income for previous years based on materials found during a search, even if those years’ assessments were already completed? The

Supreme Court clarifies scope of assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act in search cases (24 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Assessment Scope Under Section 153A of Income Tax Act: Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. vs. PCIT (24 April 2023)

/ Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 132, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 147, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 153A, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Clarifies Assessment Scope Under Section 153A of Income Tax Act: Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. vs. PCIT (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically whether the Assessing Officer’s (AO) jurisdiction is limited to incriminating material found during a search. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law, Search

Supreme Court Clarifies Assessment Scope Under Section 153A of Income Tax Act: Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. vs. PCIT (24 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant’s Obligation to Pay Rent After Landlord’s Notice: Man Singh vs. Shamim Ahmad (2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Eviction, Judges, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act, 1972 with Section 20, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act, 1972 with Section 30

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant’s Obligation to Pay Rent After Landlord’s Notice: Man Singh vs. Shamim Ahmad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant can continue to deposit rent in court after the landlord has issued a notice demanding rent. CASE TYPE: Rent and Eviction. Case Name: Man Singh vs. Shamim Ahmad (Dead) Thr. Lrs. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant’s Obligation to Pay Rent After Landlord’s Notice: Man Singh vs. Shamim Ahmad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Tenant’s Failure to Pay Rent to Landlord After Notice: Man Singh vs. Shamim Ahmad (2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Eviction of Tenant, Judges, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 20(2)(a), Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 30

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Tenant’s Failure to Pay Rent to Landlord After Notice: Man Singh vs. Shamim Ahmad (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 5, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 3232 Judges: Aniruddha Bose, J. and Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Can a tenant, who was previously depositing rent in court due to the landlord’s refusal to

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Tenant’s Failure to Pay Rent to Landlord After Notice: Man Singh vs. Shamim Ahmad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Balu Sudam Khalde vs. State of Maharashtra (29 March 2023)

/ Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 6, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 8, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 300, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Balu Sudam Khalde vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in upholding the conviction of the appellants for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and whether the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 of the IPC.

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Balu Sudam Khalde vs. State of Maharashtra (29 March 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top