Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Allows Purse Seine Fishing Beyond Tamil Nadu’s Territorial Waters: Fisherman Care Association vs. Union of India (24 January 2023)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Entry 57 of List I, Fisheries Law, Judges, Marine Products Export Development Authority Act, 1972, Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Tamil Nadu Marine Fishing Regulation Rules, 2020

Supreme Court Allows Purse Seine Fishing Beyond Tamil Nadu’s Territorial Waters: Fisherman Care Association vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State of Tamil Nadu can restrict Purse Seine Fishing beyond its territorial waters. CASE TYPE: Fisheries Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: Fisherman Care, Registered Association vs. The Government of India, Department of […]

Supreme Court Allows Purse Seine Fishing Beyond Tamil Nadu’s Territorial Waters: Fisherman Care Association vs. Union of India (24 January 2023) Read Post »

Purse Seine Fishing Permitted Beyond Territorial Waters: Supreme Court’s Interim Order in Fisherman Care Association vs. Union of India (24 January 2023)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Entry 57 of List I, Constitutional Law with Seventh Schedule, Judges, Marine Products Export Development Authority Act, 1972, Marine Products Export Development Authority Act, 1972 with Section 11, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court allows Purse Seine Fishing beyond Tamil Nadu’s territorial waters: Fisherman Care Association vs. Union of India (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24 January 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 82 Judges: A.S. Bopanna, J. and Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Can a State government restrict fishing activities beyond its territorial waters? The Supreme Court of India recently

Purse Seine Fishing Permitted Beyond Territorial Waters: Supreme Court’s Interim Order in Fisherman Care Association vs. Union of India (24 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Dowry Harassment Case: Rajaram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ Admissibility of Evidence, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 32, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Offences Against Women, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Dowry Harassment Case: Rajaram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility and evidentiary value of dying declarations in dowry harassment cases. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Dowry Harassment Case Name: Rajaram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [Judgment Date]: 16 December 2022 Date of the Judgment: 16 December 2022 Citation:

Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Dowry Harassment Case: Rajaram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies interest calculation on decreed amounts: Nepa Limited vs. Manoj Kumar Agrawal (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI, Rule 1, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation on Decreed Amounts: Nepa Limited vs. Manoj Kumar Agrawal (2022) Date of the Judgment: 08 December 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, J. and Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Can interest be claimed on a decreed amount when a portion of it has already been paid and withdrawn by

Supreme Court clarifies interest calculation on decreed amounts: Nepa Limited vs. Manoj Kumar Agrawal (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Convicts Gurbachan Singh for Murder Under Section 302 with Section 34, IPC in Land Dispute Case (2022)

/ Common Intention, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Joint Liability, Judges, Murder, Sanjiv Khanna, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Convicts Gurbachan Singh for Murder Under Section 302 with Section 34, IPC in Land Dispute Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in altering the conviction of Gurbachan Singh from Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 to Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code,

Supreme Court Convicts Gurbachan Singh for Murder Under Section 302 with Section 34, IPC in Land Dispute Case (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi HC Order on Additional Evidence in Murder Case: Lakhan Singh vs. Amarjeet Singh (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 311, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 330, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 391, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 84, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi HC Order on Additional Evidence in Murder Case: Lakhan Singh vs. Amarjeet Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can allow additional evidence in a criminal appeal on grounds already considered by the Trial Court and affirmed by the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: Lakhan Singh

Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi HC Order on Additional Evidence in Murder Case: Lakhan Singh vs. Amarjeet Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail in Cheating Case: Sunita Devi vs. State of Haryana (2 December 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Anticipatory Bail, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Judges, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail in Cheating Case: Sunita Devi vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted in a case of alleged cheating when the accused have joined the investigation. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sunita Devi & Anr. vs. The State of Haryana Judgment Date: 2 December 2022

Supreme Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail in Cheating Case: Sunita Devi vs. State of Haryana (2 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Bond Forfeiture Amount in Security for Peace Case: Istkar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) INSC 1005 (11 November 2022)

/ Bond Forfeiture, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 107, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 446, Criminal Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Preventive Detention, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Reduces Bond Forfeiture Amount in Security for Peace Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the forfeiture of a bond for keeping the peace under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) can be for an excessive amount, and whether the court has the power to reduce the penalty. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case

Supreme Court Reduces Bond Forfeiture Amount in Security for Peace Case: Istkar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) INSC 1005 (11 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bail Granted by Trial Court in Dowry Death Case: Bhuri Bai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Dinesh Maheshwari, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 3, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 4, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Upholds Bail: Bhuri Bai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in cancelling the bail granted by the Trial Court. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal (Dowry Death). Case Name: Bhuri Bai vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh. [Judgment Date]: 11 November 2022. Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Bail Granted by Trial Court in Dowry Death Case: Bhuri Bai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Fee Regulation: Narayana Medical College vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2022)

/ Education Law, Education Law with Rule 4 of Andhra Pradesh Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee Rules, 2006, Fee Regulation, Judges, M.R. Shah, Private Institutions, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Upholds Fee Regulation: Narayana Medical College vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State Government can unilaterally enhance tuition fees for private medical colleges without the recommendation of the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee (AFRC). CASE TYPE: Education Law, Fee Regulation Case Name: Narayana Medical College vs. The State of

Supreme Court Upholds Fee Regulation: Narayana Medical College vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses PILs Against Jharkhand Chief Minister for Lack of Merit and Procedural Violations (07 November 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 192, Judges, PIL Procedure, PIL Rules, Public Interest Litigation, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses PILs Against Jharkhand Chief Minister for Lack of Merit and Procedural Violations Date of the Judgment: 07 November 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 546 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, S. Ravindra Bhat, J., Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Can a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) be entertained if the petitioner has not disclosed all relevant facts

Supreme Court Dismisses PILs Against Jharkhand Chief Minister for Lack of Merit and Procedural Violations (07 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds TDS on LTC for Foreign Travel: State Bank of India vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2022)

/ Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 10(5), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 192(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 201, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds TDS on LTC for Foreign Travel: State Bank of India vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Leave Travel Concession (LTC) availed by employees, involving a foreign leg in the travel itinerary, is exempt from tax under Section 10(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and whether the employer

Supreme Court Upholds TDS on LTC for Foreign Travel: State Bank of India vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top