Surya Kant

Supreme Court Reconstitutes Committee of Administrators for All India Football Federation: All India Football Federation vs. Rahul Mehra & Ors (2022) INSC 507 (18 May 2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Model Guidelines, National Sports Code, National Sports Code with Governance, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Reconstitutes Committee of Administrators for All India Football Federation Date of the Judgment: 18 May 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 507 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Surya Kant, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ. Can a court intervene to ensure the proper governance of a national sports federation? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this […]

Supreme Court Reconstitutes Committee of Administrators for All India Football Federation: All India Football Federation vs. Rahul Mehra & Ors (2022) INSC 507 (18 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG 2022 Schedule: Dr. R. Dinesh Kumar Reddy & Ors. vs. Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) & Ors. (13 May 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Education Law, Education Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Medical Entrance Exams, NEET-PG, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG 2022 Schedule: Dr. R. Dinesh Kumar Reddy & Ors. vs. Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the NEET-PG 2022 examination schedule should be postponed due to ongoing NEET-PG 2021 counselling. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Writ Petition Case Name: Dr. R. Dinesh Kumar Reddy & Ors. vs. Medical

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG 2022 Schedule: Dr. R. Dinesh Kumar Reddy & Ors. vs. Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) & Ors. (13 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Compensation for Endosulfan Victims: Baiju K G & Ors vs. Dr V P Joy (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Orders Compensation for Endosulfan Victims: Baiju K G & Ors vs. Dr V P Joy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Failure to implement court-ordered compensation and healthcare for victims of environmental damage. CASE TYPE: Contempt Petition arising from a Public Interest Litigation. Case Name: Baiju K G & Ors vs. Dr V P Joy. [Judgment

Supreme Court Orders Compensation for Endosulfan Victims: Baiju K G & Ors vs. Dr V P Joy (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds NEET Super Specialty Cutoff, Orders Mop-Up Round: NIMS University vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Education Law, Gazette Notification No. MCI-19(I)/2018-Med./100818, Judges, Medical Admissions, Medical Council of India, Post-Graduate Medical Education Regulations 2000, Super Specialty Courses, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds NEET Super Specialty Cutoff, Orders Mop-Up Round LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should direct the lowering of the cut-off percentile for admission to Super Specialty courses and direct the Medical Counselling Committee to conduct a mop-up round to fill vacant seats. CASE TYPE: Education Law, specifically relating to medical admissions. Case

Supreme Court Upholds NEET Super Specialty Cutoff, Orders Mop-Up Round: NIMS University vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Group of Companies Doctrine: Supreme Court refers to Larger Bench in Arbitration Case (6 May 2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 8, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Group of Companies Doctrine: Supreme Court refers to Larger Bench (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Group of Companies Doctrine in Arbitration Law CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Cox and Kings Limited vs. SAP India Private Limited & Another [Judgment Date]: 6 May 2022 Can a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement be bound by it

Group of Companies Doctrine: Supreme Court refers to Larger Bench in Arbitration Case (6 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses Further NEET PG Percentile Reduction for 2021-22 Admissions: Neppali Sai Vikash & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors (2 May 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Education Law, Judges, Medical Admissions, Post-Graduate Medical Education Regulations 2000, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Refuses Further NEET PG Percentile Reduction for 2021-22 Admissions LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should direct a further reduction in the percentile for NEET PG admissions for the academic year 2021-22. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Medical Admissions. Case Name: Neppali Sai Vikash & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Refuses Further NEET PG Percentile Reduction for 2021-22 Admissions: Neppali Sai Vikash & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors (2 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Resolves Long-Standing Dispute on Absorption of Temporary LIC Workers (27 April 2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 18, Judges, Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956, Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 with Section 48, Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 with Section 49, Surya Kant, Unfair Labour Practices, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Resolves Long-Standing Dispute on Absorption of Temporary LIC Workers (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Absorption of temporary, badli, and part-time workers. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Ranbir Singh vs. SK Roy, Chairman, Life Insurance Corp. of India & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 27 April 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 April 2022 The Supreme

Supreme Court Resolves Long-Standing Dispute on Absorption of Temporary LIC Workers (27 April 2022) Read Post »

Group of Companies Doctrine: Supreme Court clarifies its application in Arbitration: Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (27 April 2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 7, Arbitration Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Group of Companies Doctrine, Judges, Surya Kant, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court clarifies Group of Companies Doctrine in Arbitration: ONGC vs. Discovery Enterprises (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Group of Companies Doctrine in arbitration proceedings to bind non-signatory parties. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. M/s Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 27 April 2022

Group of Companies Doctrine: Supreme Court clarifies its application in Arbitration: Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (27 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the definition of ‘Financial Establishment’ under MPID Act: State of Maharashtra vs. 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. (2022) INSC 465 (22 April 2022)

/ Bela M Trivedi, Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 396, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Financial Establishment, Judges, Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 with Section 2(c), Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 with Section 2(d), Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds MPID Act: NSEL Deemed Financial Establishment LEGAL ISSUE: Whether National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) is a ‘financial establishment’ under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 (MPID Act). CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Financial Law Case Name: The State of Maharashtra vs. 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court settles the definition of ‘Financial Establishment’ under MPID Act: State of Maharashtra vs. 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. (2022) INSC 465 (22 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case: Jagjeet Singh & Ors vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 2(wa), Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case: Jagjeet Singh & Ors vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a victim has the right to be heard at the stage of adjudication of a bail application of an accused and whether the High Court overlooked relevant considerations while granting bail.

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case: Jagjeet Singh & Ors vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 18 of the Limitation Act to IBC proceedings: State Bank of India vs. Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited (2022) INSC 189

/ Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 7, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 137, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 18, Surya Kant

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 18 of the Limitation Act to IBC proceedings: State Bank of India vs. Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited (2022) INSC 189 Date of the Judgment: April 18, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 189 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J. and Surya Kant, J. Can a one-time settlement (OTS) offer or

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 18 of the Limitation Act to IBC proceedings: State Bank of India vs. Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited (2022) INSC 189 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG Internship Deadline: Shikhar vs. National Board of Examination (2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Cut-off Date, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Education Law, Internship, Judges, NEET-PG, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG Internship Deadline: Shikhar vs. National Board of Examination (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the cut-off date for completion of internship for NEET-PG 2022 can be extended further beyond 31st July 2022. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Writ Petition Case Name: Shikhar & Anr. vs. National Board of Examination & Ors. Judgment Date: 05

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG Internship Deadline: Shikhar vs. National Board of Examination (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top