T.S. Thakur

Supreme Court Directs Concurrent Sentences in Cheque Dishonor Cases: V.K. Bansal vs. State of Haryana (2013) INSC 488 (5 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 5 July 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 488 Judges: T.S. Thakur, J., Gyan Sudha Misra, J. Can sentences for multiple cheque dishonor cases run concurrently? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent judgment. The court considered whether sentences awarded to the appellant in cases under Section 138 of […]

Supreme Court Directs Concurrent Sentences in Cheque Dishonor Cases: V.K. Bansal vs. State of Haryana (2013) INSC 488 (5 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Landowners Another Chance to Prove Higher Compensation: Ramanlal Deochand Shah vs. State of Maharashtra (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 5, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 499 Judges: T.S. Thakur, J. and Gyan Sudha Misra, J. Can a landowner get another chance to prove their claim for higher compensation if they failed to present evidence in the first instance? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning

Supreme Court Allows Landowners Another Chance to Prove Higher Compensation: Ramanlal Deochand Shah vs. State of Maharashtra (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies charge framing under Section 302 and 304B IPC in dowry death cases: Jasvinder Saini & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 477 (2 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 2 July 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 477 Judges: T.S. Thakur, J., Ranjana Prakash Desai, J. Can a trial court automatically add a murder charge (Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code) in every dowry death case (Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code)? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court clarifies charge framing under Section 302 and 304B IPC in dowry death cases: Jasvinder Saini & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 477 (2 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Addition of Unexplained Cash Credits as Income: Vijay Kumar Talwar vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2010)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) order was based on sufficient evidence regarding unexplained cash credits, and if the High Court erred in dismissing the appeal for lack of a substantial question of law. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Vijay Kumar Talwar vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Addition of Unexplained Cash Credits as Income: Vijay Kumar Talwar vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2010) Read Post »

Scroll to Top